Conflicts:
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Upstream renamed some helper functions that were used in a part of the
settings page which glitch-soc slightly changed the layout of.
Ported the change.
Conflicts:
- `CHANGELOG.md`:
Upstream added newlines.
Conflicts are because the CHANGELOG was independently merged from 3.4.6 on
last security update.
Took upstream's version.
- `app/helpers/context_helper.rb`:
Conflicts because of extra vocabulary in glitch-soc. The conflicts were
actually handled in last security merge.
Kept our version.
Fixes#1649
This requires setting `HCAPTCHA_SECRET_KEY` and `HCAPTCHA_SITE_KEY`, then
enabling the admin setting at
`/admin/settings/edit#form_admin_settings_captcha_enabled`
Subsequently, a hCaptcha widget will be displayed on `/about` and
`/auth/sign_up` unless:
- the user is already signed-up already
- the user has used an invite link
- the user has already solved the captcha (and registration failed for another
reason)
The Content-Security-Policy headers are altered automatically to allow the
third-party hCaptcha scripts on `/about` and `/auth/sign_up` following the same
rules as above.
* Add admin option to remove canonical email blocks from a deleted account
* Add tootctl canonical_email_blocks to inspect and remove canonical email blocks
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/pending_accounts/index.html.haml`:
Removed upstream, while it had glitch-soc-specific changes to accomodate
for glitch-soc's theming system.
Removed the file.
Additional changes:
- `app/views/admin/accounts/index.html.haml':
Accomodate for glitch-soc's theming system.
Conflicts:
- `.env.production.sample`:
Copied upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/identity_proofs_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's extra “enable_keybase” setting.
Upstream removed keybase support altogether, so did the same.
- `app/controllers/well_known/keybase_proof_config_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's extra “enable_keybase” setting.
Upstream removed keybase support altogether, so did the same.
- `lib/mastodon/statuses_cli.rb`:
Minor conflict due to an optimization that wasn't shared between
the two versions. Copied upstream's version.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/tags/index.html.haml`:
Removed upstream while it had changes in glitch-soc to accomodate for the
theming system.
Additional changes to accomodate for the theming system:
- `app/views/admin/trends/links/preview_card_providers/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/trends/links/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/trends/tags/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/tags/show.html.haml`
* Add trending links
* Add overriding specific links trendability
* Add link type to preview cards and only trend articles
Change trends review notifications from being sent every 5 minutes to being sent every 2 hours
Change threshold from 5 unique accounts to 15 unique accounts
* Fix tests
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/admin/dashboard_controller.rb`:
Upstream completely redesigned the admin dashboard.
glitch-soc tracked extra features, but that list is
gone.
Followed upstram.
- `app/views/admin/dashboard/index.html.haml`
Upstream completely redesigned the admin dashboard.
glitch-soc tracked extra features, but that list is
gone.
Followed upstram.
Conflicts:
- `app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb`:
Upstream changed the fields returned by /api/v1/instance by adding a
`configuration` field holding a lot of useful information making our
`max_toot_chars` and `poll_limits` fields obsolete.
Keeping those around for now for compatibility.
- `app/validators/status_length_validator.rb`:
No real conflict, just URL_PLACEHOLDER_CHARS introduced too close to
MAX_CHARS which is defined differently in glitch-soc.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/helpers/accounts_helper.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/accounts/_header.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/directories/index.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Small markup change in glitch-soc, on a line that has been modified by
upstream. Ported upstream changes.
If a status with a hashtag becomes very popular, it stands to
reason that the hashtag should have a chance at trending
Fix no stats being recorded for hashtags that are not allowed
to trend, and stop ignoring bots
Remove references to hashtags in profile directory from the code
and the admin UI
* Fix issues with POSIX::Spawn, Terrapin and Ruby 3.0
Also improve the Terrapin monkey-patch for the stderr/stdout issue.
* Fix keyword argument handling throughout the codebase
* Monkey-patch Paperclip to fix keyword arguments handling in validators
* Change validation_extensions to please CodeClimate
* Bump microformats from 4.2.1 to 4.3.1
* Allow Ruby 3.0
* Add Ruby 3.0 test target to CircleCI
* Add test for admin dashboard warnings
* Fix admin dashboard warnings on Ruby 3.0
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated copyright year, we don't mention it so kept our version.
- `app/controllers/admin/dashboard_controller.rb`:
Not really a conflict, upstream change (removing the spam checker) too close
to glitch-soc changes. Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Same.
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
Same.
- `app/views/admin/settings/edit.html.haml`:
Same.
- `config/settings.yml`:
Same.
- `config/environments/production.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a default HTTP header, but we have
extra headers in glitch-soc.
Added the header.
As far as I understand, the brakeman warning was a false-positive as
`content_tag` properly escapes untrusted HTML. Furthermore, the interpolated
string values are built from the “username” part of accounts, which is
restricted to a small subset of ASCII that precludes any XML entity or HTML
code.
This proposed change should be functionally equivalent to the current code,
however it is slightly more robust, it's more idiomatic, and Brakeman will
stop complaining about it.
Claire