Conflicts:
- `app/lib/activitypub/activity/create.rb`:
Upstream refactored how `Create` activities are handled and how values are
extracted from `Create`d objects. This conflicted with how glitch-soc
supported the `directMessage` flag to explicitly distinguish between
limited and direct messages.
Ported glitch-soc's changes to latest upstream changes.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Upstream largely refactored that file and changed some of the logic.
This conflicted with glitch-soc's handling of the direct timeline and
the options to allow replies and boosts in public feeds.
Ported those glitch-soc changes on top of latest upstream changes.
- `app/services/process_mentions_service.rb`:
Upstream refactored to move mention-related ActivityPub deliveries to
`ActivityPub::DeliveryWorker`, while glitch-soc contained an extra check
to not send local-only toots to remote mentioned users.
Took upstream's version, as the check is not needed anymore, since it is
performed at the `ActivityPub::DeliveryWorker` call site already.
- `app/workers/feed_insert_worker.rb`:
Upstream added support for `update` toot events, while glitch-soc had
support for an extra timeline support, `direct`.
Ported upstream changes and extended them to the `direct` timeline.
Additional changes:
- `app/lib/activitypub/parser/status_parser.rb`:
Added code to handle the `directMessage` flag and take it into account
to compute visibility.
- `app/lib/feed_manager.rb`:
Extended upstream's support of `update` toot events to glitch-soc's
`direct` timeline.
* Add support for editing for published statuses
* Fix references to stripped-out code
* Various fixes and improvements
* Further fixes and improvements
* Fix updates being potentially sent to unauthorized recipients
* Various fixes and improvements
* Fix wrong words in test
* Fix notifying accounts that were tagged but were not in the audience
* Fix mistake
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb`:
Upstream introduced support for private pinned toots, but glitch-soc's query
was a bit different as it filtered out local-only toots.
Used upstream's query, while adding local-only filtering back.
- `app/controllers/activitypub/collections_controller.rb`:
Same thing with regards to local-only posts.
- `app/validators/status_pin_validator.rb`:
Not a real conflict, but the line below was different in glitch-soc due to
the configurable pinned toots limit.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/tags/index.html.haml`:
Removed upstream while it had changes in glitch-soc to accomodate for the
theming system.
Additional changes to accomodate for the theming system:
- `app/views/admin/trends/links/preview_card_providers/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/trends/links/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/trends/tags/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/tags/show.html.haml`
* Add trending links
* Add overriding specific links trendability
* Add link type to preview cards and only trend articles
Change trends review notifications from being sent every 5 minutes to being sent every 2 hours
Change threshold from 5 unique accounts to 15 unique accounts
* Fix tests
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, upstream-updated dependency (redis) textually too
close to glitch-soc-only dependecy.
Updated redis gem like upstream did.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Small markup change in glitch-soc, on a line that has been modified by
upstream. Ported upstream changes.
If a status with a hashtag becomes very popular, it stands to
reason that the hashtag should have a chance at trending
Fix no stats being recorded for hashtags that are not allowed
to trend, and stop ignoring bots
Remove references to hashtags in profile directory from the code
and the admin UI
* Add tests
* Ensure deleted statuses are marked as such
* Save some redis memory by not storing URIs in delete_upon_arrival values
* Avoid possible race condition when processing incoming Deletes
* Avoid potential duplicate Delete forwards
* Lower lock durations to reduce issues in case of hard crash of the Rails process
* Check for `lock.aquired?` and improve comment
* Refactor RedisLock usage in app/lib/activitypub
* Fix using incorrect or non-existent sender for relaying Deletes
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated copyright year, we don't mention it so kept our version.
- `app/controllers/admin/dashboard_controller.rb`:
Not really a conflict, upstream change (removing the spam checker) too close
to glitch-soc changes. Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Same.
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
Same.
- `app/views/admin/settings/edit.html.haml`:
Same.
- `config/settings.yml`:
Same.
- `config/environments/production.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a default HTTP header, but we have
extra headers in glitch-soc.
Added the header.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/styles/mastodon/modal.scss`:
For some reason we changed the file loading path in glitch-soc,
but now upstream has completely changed how the logo is loaded.
Applied upstream changes.
* Fix URI of repeat follow requests not being recorded
In case we receive a “repeat” or “duplicate” follow request, we automatically
fast-forward the accept with the latest received Activity `id`, but we don't
record it.
In general, a “repeat” or “duplicate” follow request may happen if for some
reason (e.g. inconsistent handling of Block or Undo Accept activities, an
instance being brought back up from the dead, etc.) the local instance thought
the remote actor were following them while the remote actor thought otherwise.
In those cases, the remote instance does not know about the older Follow
activity `id`, so keeping that record serves no purpose, but knowing the most
recent one is useful if the remote implementation at some point refers to it
by `id` without inlining it.
* Add tests
Unlike locally-issued blocks, they weren't clearing follow
relationships in both directions, follow requests or notifications.
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
Conflicts:
- `app/models/public_feed.rb`:
Upstream refactored a bit, glitch-soc had specific code for local-only
statuses.
Updated glitch-soc's specific code accordingly.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream removed RTL classes. Did the same.
- `config/settings.yml`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
Conflicts:
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md`:
Upstream added the `bug` label to bug reports.
Did the same.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Upstream put DMs back into timelines, glitch-soc was already doing it.
Ignored upstream changes.
When failing to fetch the target account, the ProcessingWorker fails
as expected, but since it hasn't cleared the `move_in_progress` flag,
the next attempt at processing skips the `Move` activity altogether.
This commit changes it to clear the flag when encountering any
unexpected error on fetching the target account. This is likely to
occur because, of, e.g., a timeout, when many instances query the
same actor at the same time.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, upstream updated dependencies that were too close to
glitch-soc-only ones in the file.
- `app/controllers/oauth/authorized_applications_controller.rb`:
Upstream changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/base_controller.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/sessions_controller.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc not preventing moved accounts from logging
in.
Ported upstream changes while keeping the ability for moved accounts to log
in.
- `app/policies/status_policy.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/rest/account_serializer.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's ability to hide followers count.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/process_mentions_service.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `package.json`:
Not a real conflict, upstream updated dependencies that were too close to
glitch-soc-only ones in the file.
* Add bell button
Fix#4890
* Remove duplicate type from post-deployment migration
* Fix legacy class type mappings
* Improve query performance with better index
* Fix validation
* Remove redundant index from notifications
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb`:
Upstream change too close to a glitch-soc change related to
instance-local toots. Merged upstream changes.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's handling of Direct Messages,
merged upstream changes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Not really a conflict, caused by glitch-soc-only dependencies
being textually too close to updated upstream dependencies.
Merged upstream changes.
* Fix not handling Undo on some activity types when they aren't inlined
When receiving an Undo for a non-inlined activity, try looking it up in
database using the URI. The queries are ad-hoc because we don't have a global
index of object URIs, and not all activity types are stored in database with
an index on their URI.
Announces are just statuses, and have an index on URIs, so this check can
be done efficiently.
Accepts cannot be handled at all because we don't record their URI at any
point.
Follows don't have an index on URI, but they have an index on the issuing
account, which should make such queries largely manageable.
Likes don't have an index on URI, they have an index on the issuing account,
but the number of favs per account may be very high, so I decided not to
handle that.
Blocks don't have an index on URI, but they have an index on the issuing
account, which should make such queries largely manageable.
In all cases, if an Undo could not be handled properly, we call `delete_later!`
because that does not require us to know more than the URI of the undone
property.
* Add tests
* Make newer blocks overwrite older ones
Allows re-synchronizing block info by re-blocking and un-blocking again
when the original Undo Block has been lost.
Claire