Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/settings/preferences_controller.rb`:
Conflicts due to us having more user settings and upstream dropping
`hide_network` (to replace it with an account attribute, properly migrated).
Dropped `hide_network` like upstream.
- `app/lib/user_settings_decorator.rb`:
Conflicts due to us having more user settings and upstream dropping
`hide_network` (to replace it with an account attribute, properly migrated).
Dropped `hide_network` like upstream.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Conflict because of slight change in how glitch-soc handles the scope to
filter out local-only posts for anonymous viewers.
Took upstream's changes and re-applied glitch-soc's change.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Conflicts due to us having more user settings and upstream dropping
`hide_network` (to replace it with an account attribute, properly migrated).
Dropped `hide_network` like upstream.
- `app/views/directories/index.html.haml`:
Conflict because upstream redesigned that page while glitch-soc had a minor
change to support hiding the number of followers.
Ported glitch-soc's change on top of upstream's redesign.
Additional changes:
- `app/models/account_statuses_filter.rb`:
See change to `app/models/status.rb`.
Fixes#1649
This requires setting `HCAPTCHA_SECRET_KEY` and `HCAPTCHA_SITE_KEY`, then
enabling the admin setting at
`/admin/settings/edit#form_admin_settings_captcha_enabled`
Subsequently, a hCaptcha widget will be displayed on `/about` and
`/auth/sign_up` unless:
- the user is already signed-up already
- the user has used an invite link
- the user has already solved the captcha (and registration failed for another
reason)
The Content-Security-Policy headers are altered automatically to allow the
third-party hCaptcha scripts on `/about` and `/auth/sign_up` following the same
rules as above.
Conflicts:
- `.env.production.sample`:
Copied upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/identity_proofs_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's extra “enable_keybase” setting.
Upstream removed keybase support altogether, so did the same.
- `app/controllers/well_known/keybase_proof_config_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's extra “enable_keybase” setting.
Upstream removed keybase support altogether, so did the same.
- `lib/mastodon/statuses_cli.rb`:
Minor conflict due to an optimization that wasn't shared between
the two versions. Copied upstream's version.
In order to work around https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/16895,
add a warning to .env.production.sample, and change the mastodon:setup rake
task to:
- output a warning if a variable will be interpreted differently by dotenv
and docker-compose
- ensure the printed config is compatible with docker-compose
Conflicts:
- `.env.production.sample`:
Upstream changed it completely.
Changed ours to merge upstream's new structure, but
keeping most of the information.
.env.production.sample has been nuked upstream, but we decided to keep it,
so change it to reflect latest changes in environment variable names.
(The link still refers to “whitelist_mode” because the documentation hasn't
been updated yet)
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, just a glitch-soc-only dependency too close to a
dependency that got updated upstream. Updated as well.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Not a real conflict, just a change too close to glitch-soc-changed code
for optionally showing boosts in public timelines.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Upstream a new, static CSS file, conflict due to glitch-soc's theming
system, include the file regardless of the theme.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream dropped 'unsafe-inline' from the 'style-src' directive, but
both files are very different. Removed 'unsafe-inline' as well.
Conflicts:
- package.json
Not really a conflict, caused by an additional dependency in glitch-soc.
- yarn.lock
Not really a conflict, caused by an additional dependency in glitch-soc.
Conflicts:
- app/models/media_attachment.rb
Upstream raised max image size from 8MB to 10MB while our limit is
configurable. Raised the default to 10MB.
Conflicts:
- app/models/media_attachment.rb
Upstream added audio attachment support
- app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb
Upstream added audio attachment support and how mimetypes are returned
- app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb
Upstream added a few fields
- config/application.rb
Upstream added a different paperclip transcoder
Added several vars that are already implemented to the .env.production.sample file.
-Max bio character limit
-Number of profile fields allowed
-Max display name character limit
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb
minor conflict because of glitch-soc's theming system
- app/controllers/stream_entries_controller.rb
minor conflict because of glitch-soc's theming system
Conflicts:
app/views/layouts/application.html.haml
Edited:
app/helpers/application_helper.rb
app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml
Conflict wasn't really one, just two changes too close to one another.
Edition was to adapt the class names for themes to class names for
skins and flavours.
Also edited app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml to strip the
duplicate admin pack inclusion thing.
Conflicts:
app/models/status.rb
db/migrate/20180528141303_fix_accounts_unique_index.rb
db/schema.rb
Resolved by taking upstream changes (no real conflicts, just glitch-soc
specific code too close to actual changes).
Conflicts:
README.md
app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb
app/lib/feed_manager.rb
config/navigation.rb
spec/lib/feed_manager_spec.rb
Conflicts were resolved by taking both versions for each change.
This means the two filter systems (glitch-soc's keyword mutes and tootsuite's
custom filters) are in place, which will be changed in a follow-up commit.
If Mastodon accesses to the hidden service via transparent proxy, it's needed to avoid checking whether it's a private address, since `.onion` is resolved to a private address.
I was previously using the `HIDDEN_SERVICE_VIA_TRANSPARENT_PROXY` to provide that function. However, I realized that using `HIDDEN_SERVICE_VIA_TRANSPARENT_PROXY` is redundant, since this specification is always used with `ALLOW_ACCESS_TO_HIDDEN_SERVICE`. Therefore, I decided to integrate the setting of `HIDDEN_SERVICE_VIA_TRANSPARENT_PROXY` into` ALLOW_ACCESS_TO_HIDDEN_SERVICE`.
Claire