From bbae926d713c103e9abc6d1271698d91726748d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ariadne Conill Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 01:55:04 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] add missing link --- content/blog/pkgconf-and-cve-2023-24056.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/content/blog/pkgconf-and-cve-2023-24056.md b/content/blog/pkgconf-and-cve-2023-24056.md index 523dae6..6aba9d1 100644 --- a/content/blog/pkgconf-and-cve-2023-24056.md +++ b/content/blog/pkgconf-and-cve-2023-24056.md @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ maintenance of pkgconf's Windows support have different goals. This has led to significant fragmentation of pkgconf on the Windows side, with different tools bundling it supporting specific aspects of the pkg-config format in different ways. + [ucblog]: https://nullprogram.com/blog/2023/01/18/ + I have a number of social and technical observations about u-config. Some good, some not so good. To start off with the social aspects: I don't particularly appreciate the level of aggression directed toward pkgconf. While that alone would