ariadne
/
smol
2
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix minor inconsistency 

git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.gnu.org/nano/trunk/nano@1726 35c25a1d-7b9e-4130-9fde-d3aeb78583b8
master
David Lawrence Ramsey 2004-05-01 04:13:06 +00:00
parent 0381c2199d
commit a849ab12ea
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
src/winio.c
View File

@ -46,14 +46,14 @@ static int statblank = 0; /* Number of keystrokes left after
* VT220, and VT320.
* - NANO_XOFF_KEY is Ctrl-S, which is XOFF under ASCII, ANSI, VT100,
* VT220, and VT320.
* - NANO_CONTROL_8 is Ctrl-? (Ctrl-8), which is Delete under ASCII,
* - NANO_CONTROL_8 is Ctrl-8 (Ctrl-?), which is Delete under ASCII,
* ANSI, VT100, and VT220, and which is Backspace under VT320.
*
* Note: VT220s and VT320s also generate Esc [ 3 ~ for Delete. By
* default, xterm assumes it's running on a VT320 and generates Ctrl-?
* (Ctrl-8) for Backspace and Esc [ 3 ~ for Delete. This causes
* default, xterm assumes it's running on a VT320 and generates Ctrl-8
* (Ctrl-?) for Backspace and Esc [ 3 ~ for Delete. This causes
* problems for VT100-derived terminals such as the FreeBSD console,
* which expect Ctrl-H for Backspace and Ctrl-? (Ctrl-8) for Delete, and
* which expect Ctrl-H for Backspace and Ctrl-8 (Ctrl-?) for Delete, and
* on which the VT320 sequences are translated by the keypad to KEY_DC
* and [nothing]. We work around this conflict via the REBIND_DELETE
* flag: if it's not set, we assume VT320 compatibility, and if it is,