It can be activated with --linenumbers on the command line or with
'set linenumbers' in a nanorc file, and it can be toggled with M-#.
Signed-off-by: Faissal Bensefia <faissaloo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
Add the keycodes and routines to allow the user to forego setting the
mark explicitly (with M-A / ^6) and instead quickly select a few words
or lines by holding down Shift together with the movement keys.
(Some combinations with Shift are swallowed by some terminal emulators.
To work around some of those, the combinations Shift+Alt+Left/Right work
as Shift+Home/End and Shift+Alt+Up/Down work as Shift+PageUp/PageDown.)
And hard-bind the keys Ctrl+Up and Ctrl+Down to these functions.
Unlike the paragraph-jumping code, these new functions disregard
any indentation, treating only blank lines as separators. They
also do an automatic smart home when that option is set.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48291.
This allows the user to specify which other characters, besides the
default alphanumeric ones, should be considered as part of a word, so
that word operations like Ctrl+Left and Ctrl+Right will pass them by.
Using this option overrides the option --wordbounds.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47283.
When the user changes her mind after having pressed Esc, she cannot
unpress Esc, so do that for her by ignoring the escape code when
the subsequent keycode is outside of the normal printable range.
This restores the behavior from before nano-2.3.5 -- except that
Ctrl+Alt+key continues to report an unbound key.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48459.
When we get a ^J as verbatim input, it is not possible to include it
into the file buffer or the prompt answer, because this would mean
adding an encoded null to the buffer or answer, and that is not what
the user intended. One option would have been to simply ignore a ^J
in verbatim input. But the choice has been made to act the same way
as when the ^J (0x0A) is found in the file data: start a new line.
That is the same response as to the Enter key, yes -- but the code
for the Enter key is ^M (0x0D), not ^J. So, to be more precise,
rename the relevant variable from 'got_enter' to 'got_newline'.
Keystrokes are single integers (aided by the flags meta_key and
func_key) but in the input stream they can be encoded as escape
sequences (a series of bytes). Characters are values in byte
range, but in UTF-8 one character can consist of multiple bytes.
Also rename two variables, because the secondary input buffer
that they refer to contains only characters (mostly just one),
never any shortcuts; and there are too many "kbinput" already.
Don't make it the responsibility of the executed functions to restore
the list of shortcuts of the edit window. Just detect whether another
menu was displayed, and if so, redisplay the main menu.
To add a character, one does not need to allocate twice its size.
And the amount to be moved does not depend on the size of the new
character; it just needs to include the terminating zero.
(This fixes in do_output() the same logical mistakes that were fixed
in do_statusbar_output() last February, in acf19bd and 7c0e433.)
Specifying an operating directory should either lead to a successfull
confinement, or nano should fail to start.
(Also: save the terminal settings as soon as possible, so that an early
die() will not restore uninitialized values.)
This fixes the first part of https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47798 properly.
Benno Schulenberg