Unlike a regular paragraph, marked text may have different quotes and
more than two types of indentation. Handle this by replacing deviant
quotes with the quote of the first line, and deviant indentation with
the indentation of the second line.
This is modelled after Pico's behavior. However, Pico won't do anything
if you do a full-justify while the mark is on. But this is unnecessarily
limiting, so, when the mark is on, nano will handle a full-justify and a
plain justify the same.
This currently does not handle the lead (quoting + indentation) in
justified selections, does not put mid-line justified selections onto
separate lines, and does not strip whitespace after the lead in justified
selections, the latter two of which Pico does. These behaviors are
forthcoming.
concat_paragraph() concatenates a paragraph into a single line, and
rewrap_paragraph() rewraps that line into multiple lines again.
These two will be needed when the justifying of marked text is added.
Instead of passing 'quote_len' to these functions, calculate it directly
in them.
This will be needed when the justifying of marked text is added. When
unmarked text is justified, it is a single paragraph and by definition
has a uniform quoting part. But marked text may be a jumble of lines
that have different quoting parts.
When doing replacements or fixing misspelled words, and edit_refresh()
is called to highlight the relevant word, then the current menu can be
anything from MREPLACEWITH, MYESNO, MSPELL, or MMAIN. Make sure it is
always set to the latter just before calling edit_refresh(), so that
display_string() will use the full length and the word gets properly
highlighted.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55680.
Reported-by: David Lawrence Ramsey <pooka109@gmail.com>
Bug was introduced by the previous commit, 56181896.
The reduced file size should be stored not just when joining two lines
but also when simply a character in the middle of a line is deleted.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55352.
Bug existed since version 2.5.0, commit 66e21416.
Reuse the WAS_FINAL_LINE flag to signal a cut that added a magicline,
for both a marked cut and cut-to-eof.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55305.
The direct call was a leftover of the old unjustify mechanism.
Also, move two statements to the end of the do_justify() routine,
since that is their place in comparable routines.
Suggested-by: David Lawrence Ramsey <pooka109@gmail.com>
Not stepping beyond the last line of the paragraph means that the
length of the paragraph is always the difference in line numbers
(between first and last line of the paragraph) plus one.
When leaving the mark on while justifying and then undoing the
justification, things are likely to get messed up. My applying
David's patches only partially caused this breakage.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55074.
Only the first search for a paragraph needs to check whether we're
currently in the middle of a paragraph. When the 'while' loop for
a full justify is executed, all calls of find_paragraph() start
either on the first line of a paragraph or between two paragraphs.
To find a paragraph, what needs to be done is:
a) When not in a paragraph, move forward until we find one, if any.
b) When in a paragraph but not at its start, move back to its start.
c) Move forward to the end of the paragraph, if any.
When, in the 'while' loop for a full justify, 'filebot_inpar' becomes
TRUE, it means that EOF has been reached and find_paragraph() should
not be called again. To allow 'filebot_inpar' to convey this meaning,
it should not be set to TRUE elsewhere, so another boolean is needed
for setting the correct length of the final line of the cutbuffer.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55086.
David Lawrence Ramsey