I don't know what I was thinking three years ago with this convoluted
'from_x' and 'to_x'. When undoing an <Enter>, the cursor always needs
to be placed back at the 'head' point. And the data always needs to be
copied starting from 'tail_x' (skipping any whitespace that autoindent
might have added).
When redoing an <Enter>, there is no need to reallocate and copy the
data of the line, it is enough to just clip it at the original cursor
position. (This wastes some memory, but... how often does one redo
an <Enter>? So, conciseness of the code is preferable.)
And before the buffer size is adjusted, so that the add_undo()
doesn't need to correct the stored former size of the buffer.
This will allow the injection of multiple characters at once,
in the next commit.
The SPLIT_BEGIN item gets tucked underneath the ADD item on the top of
the undo stack. Thus: that SPLIT_BEGIN item should copy the 'wassize'
of the ADD item instead of storing the current buffer size.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57832.
Bug existed since the undo functionality was added, and existed
in this form since version 2.3.5, commit be10c2a4.
In theory this would allow injecting more than one character at a time
into the edit buffer. But the creation and updating of an undo item for
the addition or the deletion of a character are a bit strange. For all
other operations and add_undo() is called before the operation, and an
update_undo() afterward. But for an ADD, the add_undo() is called after
the operation, and for a DEL/BACK, the update_undo() is called before
the operation. There is some logic to that, but things would be easier
to understand if all operations were handled the same: an add_undo()
beforehand (when needed), and an update_undo() afterward.
When something is pasted or inserted onto the final, empty line of a
buffer, an automatic new magic line is created after it, when needed.
When this paste or insertion is undone, the added magic line should
also be removed again.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57808.
Bug existed since the undo capabilities were added,
since before version 2.3.0.
The few calls of the injection routines that had 'filtering' set to
TRUE have already filtered out ASCII control codes earlier on. And
in the case of injecting a completion, this completion only contains
word-forming characters -- and if the user somehow added a control
code to the word-forming characters, then nano should NOT filter it
out, so in fact that setting of 'filtering' to TRUE was mistaken.
Note that this filtering did not filter out 0x7F (DEL). But that is
fine: it should not occur in the input stream at that point anyway,
as it gets translated to either KEY_DC or KEY_BACKSPACE earlier in
the keyboard parsing routines.
Since the previous commit, nano exits from curses mode soon after
this message is printed, so that the user does not have any time
to read it or even see it.
When invoking the "internal" speller, leave curses mode while the three
programs in the pipe array are executing, to prevent 'hunspell' from
writing a long error message to the end of the status bar, making the
screen scroll, and thus messing it up. Now the error message gets
printed to the screen that nano was started up from, and will thus be
visible when the user exits from nano. (At least: it will be so on a
terminal emulator -- on a VT, nothing will be seen.)
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57728.
Bug existed since version 4.6, commit 4d77e0ad.
At that point, 'u->cutbuffer' will always be NULL, either from the
original creation of the INSERT undo item, or by having been freed
and set to NULL by do_redo().
Just like nano beeps when an unbound key is pressed at other prompts,
or in the help viewer, or in the file browser.
Signed-off-by: Brand Huntsman <alpha@qzx.com>
The suppression of auto-indentation, automatic hard-wrapping, and
tab-to-spaces conversion is now inherent in the way the reading-in
of a bracketed paste is handled by the previous commit: as a single
block of text.
Also, do not break overlong lines and do not convert tabs to spaces,
nor interpret a <Tab> as an indent command (when the mark is on).
In other words: accept an outside paste as literally as possible.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?40060.
Requested-by: Egmont Koblinger <egmont@gmail.com>
And fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57527.
Requested-by: Sébastien Desreux <seb@h-k.fr>
Requested-by: Hans Ecke <hecke@gxt.com>
Original-idea-by: Brand Huntsman <alpha@qzx.com>
When justifying a paragraph, always first squeeze() is called on
the text (which at that moment consists of a single long line),
which means that (in its wrappable part) this line contains only
single spaces as word separators (and maybe a double space after
a period). So there is no need to call the general is_blank()
function -- checking for a space is enough.
Rationale: nano should not wrap inside the quoting part of a line
because it would change the quoting level, which would misrepresent
things, nor should it wrap inside the indentation part because when
the user tries to indent something beyond the target wrapping width,
she/he does not intend to create a line containing only whitespace,
but effectively wants to push the text beyond the wrapping width.
This copies the behavior of the rewrap_paragraph() routine that is
used during justification, so that automatic hard-wrapping ends up
with the same result as justifying.
Also, always do automatic hard-wrapping when --breaklonglines is in
effect, also when --autoindent is active.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57425.
The bug was old -- it existed since at least version 2.0.6.
This furthermore avoids https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57422.
Reported-by: Sébastien Desreux <seb@h-k.fr>
That bug existed since version 4.4, commit 8fce33af.
That is: allow tabs and spaces to be mixed when comparing indentation.
When the mix of tabs and spaces pushes the text of a line to the same
column as on a consecutive line, then those two lines are considered
to have the same indentation and thus belong to the same paragraph.
This reverts the previous commit (594ef222), and improves upon how
nano has behaved since version 2.9.8.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57404 differently.
That is: two consecutive lines are considered to belong to separate
paragraphs when the smallest indentation of those two lines is not
character-by-character identical with the corresponding piece of
indentation of the other line.
In other words: if one line is indented with spaces, and a consecutive
line is indented by the same distance but with tabs, they are taken to
belong to different paragraphs: a justification will not merge them.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57404.
Bug existed since version 2.9.8, commit 432a7d77.
Also, 'hunspell' is sensitive to the 'LANG' environment variable,
so that spell checking will take place for the language that the
user is using, instead of always for English. (This is a behavior
change, and some people may not like it, expecting the spell check
to occur always for English, but... we'll see.)
This increases the chances that spell checking will work out of the box,
without any extra installing or configuration.
This addresses https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57296.
Benno Schulenberg