Bind the toggling of a bookmark to <Alt+Insert>, and the jumping to the
previous and next bookmark to <Alt+PageUp> and <Alt+PageDown>, so that
these functions are available by default.
Signed-off-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com>
With the 'bookmark' function, the user can place a bookmark on any
line in the buffer. Multiple lines can be bookmarked in this way.
With 'prevbookmark' and 'nextbookmark', the user can then easily
return to the bookmarked lines. The search for a bookmark wraps
around, as if start and end of buffer are connected.
[However, in this implementation, when a bookmarked line is deleted,
the bookmark is deleted too. This is undesirable. Also, when such
a deleted line is pasted elsewhere, the bookmark reappears with it,
and when pasted multiple times, the bookmark will be there as many
times. This is thoroughly undesirable. These behaviors will be
changed in a later commit.]
A bookmark is not yet visible in any way.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57577.
Requested-by: Ken Tyler <kent@werple.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@telfort.nl>
This has the pleasing effect of not changing the linestruct of the
succeeding line when a line is cut.
This addresses https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56226.
Instead of duplicating information, just refer to 'man nanorc'.
Also reshuffle a paragraph, and add a suggestion to just select
the syntax files that will actually get used.
It should give the same result as 'wc -w' as long as the content
of 'wordchars' does not affect the counting.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58123.
Bug existed since version 2.6.2, since the --wordchars option was
introduced in commit 6f12992c.
First the clause for the intro text and the normal lines, and then the
clause for the continuation lines (that are narrower and indented).
Also, avoid blanking the status bar when initializing the subwindows
anyway, and avoid an unneeded resfreshing call -- the bottombars()
function will take care of that.
Normally, when undoing an <Enter> that created automatic indentation,
the created whitespace should be skipped when rejoining the two lines.
In other words: take the data starting from tail_x in the second line.
But when the <Enter> occurred at the end of leading whitespace, then
that whitespace has disappeared from the original line and it should
be copied back in from the second line. That is: from x is zero.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58108.
Reported-by: Liu Hao <lh_mouse@126.com>
Bug existed since version 4.9, commit 1961c052.
Avoid having to decrement the count in order to offset the increment
at the end of the loop.
Also, declare a variable on a separate line, and rename it.
When using --nonewlines and the cursor has arrived at the end of the
final line, each press of M-6 would add another copy of that line to
the cutbuffer. That is clearly not the right behavior.
Also, give feedback when a press of M-6 does not actually copy anything.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58088.
The bug was old -- it existed since before version 2.2.0.
First cutting the text to be copied (before copying it back into the
buffer) had unwanted side effects: it moved the cursor, and changed
the linestructs of the current line and the line where the mark was.
[This takes thirty more lines, but the idea is to later get rid of
the partitioning routines entirely.]
This means that in most cases mark_is_before_cursor() is called twice:
once before get_region() is called, and once by get_region() itself.
This small duplication of effort is acceptable: the affected functions
are not time critical, and it makes the code shorter.
It is very unlikely that anyone uses those keystrokes: 1) no keyboard
has such keys; 2) the default bindings for these keys were removed a
year and a half ago, and no one complained; 3) for several years nano
did not recognize the modern xterm escape sequences for F13 to F16,
and no one ssh'ing from a new machine to an old machine complained.
The only people who might be affected by this removal are Konsole users:
a Konsole claims to be an xterm, but sends its own peculiar "Esc O 2 X"
sequences for F13 to F16. Using the data from terminfo, ncurses will
not recognize those sequences, and will pass them untranslated to nano.
When nano now stops recognizing them too... Well, let's see if there
are any Konsole users that use F13 to F16.
All those items that were marked as DONE are not actually TO-DO items.
Also, most of those things are mentioned in the IMPROVEMENTS file too.
So, add the few that were missing there, and condense/rewrap some.
Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita