Consecutive additions all happen on the same line. When automatic
hard-wrapping occurs, the ADD item is grouped together with an ENTER
item, and subsequent additions go into a new ADD item.
If the user really wants to match anything, ".*" should be used.
(This also stops nano looking at the rest of the line as soon as an
empty regular expression is encountered. This may seem like poorer
feedback than before, but... I think that multiple error messages
per line are more confusing than helpful.)
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57942.
Bug existed since before version 2.2.0.
A short allows for more than 32 thousand values, and the maximum number
of multiline regexes in any of the current syntaxes is... just four.
Reshuffle it to the beginning also because it is used the most often.
Either the marked region was cut (even when zero characters) or
the entire contents of the buffer were cut. In both cases this
is what needs to be piped to the command. That is: the contents
of the cutbuffer.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57931.
Bug existed since version 2.9.8, commit f304b9ae,
when piping text to an external command was introduced.
Allow the creation of an empty CUT undo item (because the result of a
filtering operation may be empty), but then don't crash when undoing
such an empty CUT.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57929.
Bug existed since version 2.9.8, when filtering was introduced.
Trying to do so would dereference a NULL pointer in copy_node().
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57915.
Bug existed since before version 2.2.0.
Also, remove two superfluous closings of file descriptors. The second
one has most likely already been closed by send_data(), by closing the
tube, and the first one will be closed by exiting from the process.
Also, avoid two superfluous assignments of a message, as they get
overwritten immediately by other ones, and later with the same.
Furthermore, remove two pointless placements of the cursor. Any
necessary placements are handled by the actual adding of data and
the breaking of lines in the ADD and ENTER items.
Especially when undoing an addition, reallocating the line data is a
waste of time, because most likely other text will be added instead.
(This also removes a coding error in the redo code for a deletion:
it allocated too many bytes for the new line data: twice the amount
of the deletion too much.)
I don't know what I was thinking three years ago with this convoluted
'from_x' and 'to_x'. When undoing an <Enter>, the cursor always needs
to be placed back at the 'head' point. And the data always needs to be
copied starting from 'tail_x' (skipping any whitespace that autoindent
might have added).
When redoing an <Enter>, there is no need to reallocate and copy the
data of the line, it is enough to just clip it at the original cursor
position. (This wastes some memory, but... how often does one redo
an <Enter>? So, conciseness of the code is preferable.)
Benno Schulenberg