Trimming trailing spaces is good, but we should not trim the space
(or tab or other blank) that the user just typed and that caused the
hard-wrapping to occur.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52948.
Reported-by: Andreas Schamanek <schamane@fam.tuwien.ac.at>
Each leading tab is converted to two tabs, and any leading four spaces
is converted to one tab. The intended tab size (for keeping most lines
within 80 columns) is now four.
If the marked region ends at the start of a line, do not include that
line in the indenting/undenting or commenting/uncommenting. This is
closer to what the eye would expect.
Unset the "Modified" marker only at the point where the file was last
saved -- if there is such a point, because it can be missing when the
undo stack was discarded.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52689.
Reported-by: Liu Hao <lh_mouse@126.com>
Original-idea-by: Brand Huntsman <alpha@qzx.com>
And also allow it when lines are only partially indented.
This makes it possible to equalize the indentations of (accidentally)
unevenly indented lines: by first fully unindenting a group of lines,
and then reindenting them to the desired amount.
Suggested-by: Liu Hao <lh_mouse@126.com>
When the WAS_FINAL_LINE flag is relevant (when NO_NEWLINES isn't set),
the only way for 'current' to be equal to 'filebot' is when 'current_x'
is zero.
When some or all edits have been undone, and the user starts to make
new edits, the old part of the undo stack is discarded, but this does
not mean that the undo stack doesn't go back to the very beginning.
This really fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52504.
This also means that no question needs to be asked when exiting.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52504.
Reported-by: Peter Passchier <peter@passchier.net>
The pointer not being NULL is enough indication that the mark is set.
Also, rename the pointer from 'mark_begin' to simply 'mark', since
the former is kind of pleonastic.
Because the highlighting hinders the display of affected lines,
and, more importantly, only the highlighted part would be written
if the file was modified and the user answers yes to the "Save?"
prompt.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52474.
In the tiny version, do_prompt() will now have an extra NULL
parameter, which will cost maybe twenty extra bytes of code.
That is acceptable when it saves thirty lines in the source.
Before writing a file out, nano should check that the file on disk
hasn't been modified since it was read -- not only for the normal
"Write Out" action (^O), but also for "Save File" (future ^S) and
for "Save and Exit" (^X when --tempfile is used).
When writing fails and --tempfile is in effect, don't go on to prompt
for a file name; instead let the user decide what she wants to do.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51040.
Signed-off-by: Viorel Bota <botaviorel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@telfort.nl>
Benno Schulenberg