When doing autoindentation, and the next line is not the start of
a new paragraph, then use the indentation of that line for the new
line, as it is more likely to have the desired indentation -- the
current line might be the start of the paragraph and thus could
have a deviant indentation.
Pico wraps at the last blank character before or on the target column;
if there is no such blank, then it will wrap at the first blank *after*
the target column -- when it can wrap, it will wrap. Nano should do
the same (and judging from the comments, it intended to do the same),
instead of turning the paragraph into a single unwrapped line.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53986.
First step to the next buffer, and then iterate until we either
find a match or are back at the buffer where we started.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53970.
Signed-off-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <address@hidden>
The two help lines will be redrawn in main() only when the current
menu is not MMAIN. So, set it to MLINTER as soon as the help lines
are cleared, just before preparing to invoke the linter.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53967.
Reported-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com>
When executing a command in the current buffer and piping this buffer
(or marked region) to that command, then the cutting of the existing
text and the insertion of the new text should be undone and redone
together, as to the user they appear as a single operation.
With-help-from: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com>
When executing a command, it is now possible to pipe the entire buffer
(or the marked region, if anything is marked) to the external command.
The output from the command replaces the buffer (or the marked region),
or goes to a new buffer.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?28993,
and fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53041.
Signed-off-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@telfort.nl>
When 'afterends' is set and Ctrl+Right or Shift+Ctrl+Right is pressed,
nano will stop at the ends of words instead of their beginnings.
Signed-off-by: Mark-Weston <markweston@cock.li>
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@telfort.nl>
Set the NO_NEWLINES flag to achieve this. And move the saving and
restoring of the global flags to the main speller routine, so the
flags aren't saved and restored for each internal spell fix.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53742.
Acked-by: David Lawrence Ramsey <pooka109@gmail.com>
Bug existed since commit 30fc197b (a month ago) which changed the
type of 'i' from int to size_t, causing the comparison to do the
wrong thing when 'threshold' is negative.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53722.
Reported-by: Devin Hussey <husseydevin@gmail.com>
The formatter or linter might have changed in the meantime -- when
the filename was changed to have a different extension, for example.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53716.
Indenting/unindenting always happens in a single contiguous block.
Lines that cannot or should not be indented or unindented do not
need to remembered separately as it follows from their content.
In the preceding commit, open_buffer() was changed so that it gets
told whether to load into a new buffer or not, so it is no longer
needed to convey this information through a flag.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53269.
Reported-by: Ashish Kunwar <dorkerdevil280@gmail.com>
The leak was mistakenly introduced by commit dc3618a1
-- probably as a leftover of testing things.
First the two that add something (ADD, ENTER), then the three that
delete something (BACK, DEL, JOIN), and then the one that changes
something (REPLACE). Then the SPLITs, CUT, PASTE, and INSERT, and
then the INDENTs and COMMENTs, when they exist.
For cuts, pastes, and inserts, the lines have already been renumbered;
for indents, comments, and replacements, the line numbers cannot have
changed. (And anyway, variable 'f' is not set for those cases.)
Only when lines get split (ENTER) or fused together (JOIN) do the later
lines need to be renumbered. This mirrors what is done for do_redo().
The 'f' variable is used only in the ADD, BACK, DEL, ENTER, JOIN, and
REPLACE undo/redo cases. So, avoid making a somewhat costly call when
it is entirely superfluous. Rearrange the undo types to make checking
for the above six types easier.
When using --smooth or 'set smooth', the screen should scroll the
minimum amount needed to get the cursor back into view. (The only
exceptions are search, undo, and redo -- when there the cursor goes
offscreen, the cursor line is centered.)
This change brings the behavior of pressing <Enter> on the bottom
row into line with, for example, pasting a single line. See also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nano-devel/2018-02/msg00027.html.
Trimming trailing spaces is good, but we should not trim the space
(or tab or other blank) that the user just typed and that caused the
hard-wrapping to occur.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52948.
Reported-by: Andreas Schamanek <schamane@fam.tuwien.ac.at>
Each leading tab is converted to two tabs, and any leading four spaces
is converted to one tab. The intended tab size (for keeping most lines
within 80 columns) is now four.
If the marked region ends at the start of a line, do not include that
line in the indenting/undenting or commenting/uncommenting. This is
closer to what the eye would expect.
Unset the "Modified" marker only at the point where the file was last
saved -- if there is such a point, because it can be missing when the
undo stack was discarded.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52689.
Reported-by: Liu Hao <lh_mouse@126.com>
Original-idea-by: Brand Huntsman <alpha@qzx.com>
And also allow it when lines are only partially indented.
This makes it possible to equalize the indentations of (accidentally)
unevenly indented lines: by first fully unindenting a group of lines,
and then reindenting them to the desired amount.
Suggested-by: Liu Hao <lh_mouse@126.com>
When the WAS_FINAL_LINE flag is relevant (when NO_NEWLINES isn't set),
the only way for 'current' to be equal to 'filebot' is when 'current_x'
is zero.
When some or all edits have been undone, and the user starts to make
new edits, the old part of the undo stack is discarded, but this does
not mean that the undo stack doesn't go back to the very beginning.
This really fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52504.
This also means that no question needs to be asked when exiting.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52504.
Reported-by: Peter Passchier <peter@passchier.net>
The pointer not being NULL is enough indication that the mark is set.
Also, rename the pointer from 'mark_begin' to simply 'mark', since
the former is kind of pleonastic.
Because the highlighting hinders the display of affected lines,
and, more importantly, only the highlighted part would be written
if the file was modified and the user answers yes to the "Save?"
prompt.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52474.
Benno Schulenberg