When coloring a line, look only at the multidata of the preceding
line, and based on that determine what to seek in the current line.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50292.
When painting a line, the multidata of the line /before/ it is valid
in most cases: it was determined just a moment ago. And it tells us
all we need to know: whether there is an unpaired start match before
the current line or not.
The only exception is when painting the first line of the screen:
the multidata of the line before it might be stale. So for the
first screen line we will always have to do some backtracking.
But that is left for later.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50121.
If we're somewhere deep into the file and do a spell check, and the
first misspelled word happens to be right there, onscreen already,
then this word does not need to be centered -- it /should/ not be
centered. We should scroll only when necessary.
After the changes to the search routine, it is no longer necessary to
take one step back before starting a replacement session.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50147.
Even when a match falls within the marked region, this does not mean
that it is a true match when already the whole file has been searched,
because then this is the second time we find this match.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50158.
The spell fixer does not provide a beginning line, so the search routine
should then not try to refer to any data of this line. Also, since the
changes to the search routine there is no need any more to retreat one
step before starting to search for a misspelled word.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50159.
That is: remove the special treatment of BOW anchors, and instead make
regexes match against the whole line instead of against an artificially
shortened one, because the latter method creates ghost matches: matches
at the starting point of the search that aren't really matches when seen
in the context of the whole line.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50030.
When the tail of a match falls outside of the marked region,
it is in fact not a match and should not be replaced.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50136.
When a replacement happens right at where the cursor sits, the position
of the cursor should not be adjusted, because the real cursor position
is between the current character and the preceding one: the place where
the cursor is shown is in fact right /after/ the insertion point.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50134,
and fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50135.
Just assign the 'CNONE' value upfront, instead of figuring out
at the end of the line whether anything has been assigned yet.
Also, the old logic would leave unmarked a line that contains a
start match without any terminating end match. Not serious, but
not right.
Don't blithely overshoot the end of a line when both start regex and
end regex match an empty string. Overshooting would let the matching
run on into uncharted country and thus ultimately cause a segfault.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50056.
Reported-by: Elia Geretto <elia.f.geretto@gmail.com>
During precalculation and in step_two, we begin looking for an end
match only after the full start match, not merely one byte beyond
its starting point. So do that too when searching backward for an
unpaired start match.
Also, index can never be zero here, because if the match was of length
zero, this piece of code will have been skipped by the preceding goto.
So we can always use REG_NOTBOL here.
(That goto is wrong, by the way: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50078,
but that will follow later.)
A search should start at the place of the cursor, not one step beyond,
so that the non-word boundary between the current character and the next
will be found. Starting one step beyond the current character, as was
done until now, would find the non-word boundary between the next and
the overnext character as the first one.
If the given line is out of range of editwinrows, we don't display it
at all, so we obviously don't display more than one line of it. Thus,
the return value in this case should be zero, not one.
Benno Schulenberg