Only for BACK and DEL was the first call to update_undo() -- all other
types of action would call add_undo() first, so for them the action in
update_undo() would never be different, but the line number might have
changed (like for ENTER and INSERT), so for them exceptions needed to
be made, which was wasteful.
This addresses https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54728.
When using the internal spell checker, the message gets overwritten
immediately by "Creating misspelled word list...", and when using
the external spell checker, nano immediately exits from curses mode
and thus the message disappears (when in a terminal emulator) or it
soon gets wiped by the spell checker (when on a Linux console), thus
creating a little flash on the bottom row, which we can do without.
In the past, SIGWINCHes were responded to immediately (which was madness),
but since commit 75d64e67 all a SIGWINCH does is set a flag so that, when
the time comes to update the screen, nano knows the dimensions may have
changed. The mentioned commit removed most blockings and unblockings of
SIGWINCH, but not this one.
That is, wait with deleting words until they start under cursor,
so the user can see which word is goin to be eaten, and join lines
only when the cursor already sits at the edge of a line.
If find_paragraph() detects that we're not in a paragraph, it moves
forward a paragraph and then backward to that paragraph's beginning.
Make it check whether we're in a paragraph before moving backward
(since there might not *be* any more paragraphs), to prevent going
forth-and-back and never reaching the end of the buffer.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54573.
And restore the cursor to this position when redoing the cut+insert.
Also remove two unneeded conditions.
This fully fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54466.
When piping the buffer (or the marked region) to an external command,
we should wait not only for the external command to terminate but also
for the data-sending process, so that it will release its resources.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54499.
With-help-from: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com>
When undoing/redoing an alternate spell check (of the entire file
or of a backwards marked region), put the cursor back where it was
when the spell check was invoked/finished.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54466.
Since the last version, the user can filter an entire buffer through
an external command. This external command can also be a formatting
program, so there is no longer any need for this specific and special
formatter command.
Print routines are not asynchronous-safe.
But... the only reason the call of kill() could return an error code
is when the relevant process has already terminated -- which is not
a problem, because that was the goal of calling kill().
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54409.
Reported-by: Daniel Kozovsky <dkozovsk@redhat.com>
The undo item for ENTER should record the file size *before* the amount
of auto-indentation whitespace is added to it.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54344.
Reported-by: Liu Hao <lh_mouse@126.com>
Instead of being entirely silent when ^] is hit after whitespace
or punctuation, report what is lacking -- similar to M-] saying
"Not a bracket" when the cursor is not sitting on a bracket.
This makes the ^] keystroke more discoverable.
Take our cue from undoing/redoing line joins: when they take place on
the magicline without --nonewlines, they produce undo/redo items that
don't do anything to the text, but still position the cursor properly.
Reshuffle a bit of code so that we can do the same for magicline cuts.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54032.
The variable 'last_action' is set at the end of these functions,
serving to prevent a fresh action from being merged with an older
action further down on the stack. Setting 'last_action' before
exiting from undo()/redo() makes no sense.
Also adjust a sideways related old Changelog item.
The macro stuff, however, is basically my code: I told him exactly
how to do it, and I changed most of the patch before applying it.
Also, put myself in second place, as I've just about overtaken David
in the duration of maintainership.
The paragraph-aware indenting is needed only when automatic long-line
wrapping is on (that is, when not using 'nowrap': when writing prose).
When writing code, the user most likely uses --nowrap, which will make
nano indent a new line always to the same amount as the preceding line
-- when --autoindent is in effect, of course.
Benno Schulenberg