Bind the toggling of a bookmark to <Alt+Insert>, and the jumping to the
previous and next bookmark to <Alt+PageUp> and <Alt+PageDown>, so that
these functions are available by default.
Signed-off-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com>
This means that in most cases mark_is_before_cursor() is called twice:
once before get_region() is called, and once by get_region() itself.
This small duplication of effort is acceptable: the affected functions
are not time critical, and it makes the code shorter.
It is very unlikely that anyone uses those keystrokes: 1) no keyboard
has such keys; 2) the default bindings for these keys were removed a
year and a half ago, and no one complained; 3) for several years nano
did not recognize the modern xterm escape sequences for F13 to F16,
and no one ssh'ing from a new machine to an old machine complained.
The only people who might be affected by this removal are Konsole users:
a Konsole claims to be an xterm, but sends its own peculiar "Esc O 2 X"
sequences for F13 to F16. Using the data from terminfo, ncurses will
not recognize those sequences, and will pass them untranslated to nano.
When nano now stops recognizing them too... Well, let's see if there
are any Konsole users that use F13 to F16.
Only for the last item at the end of each of the two help lines there
are sometimes a few extra columns available. Do not use these extra
columns also for the other help items, because apparently, when wmove()
lands in the second column of a double-width character, it does not
wipe out this character (replacing it with a space) but goes to the
next column instead, causing a misalignment of the text.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57994.
Bug existed since version 1.3.12, commit e806ab84.
The placeholder half-duplicates the character that is actually shown
at the beginning of the next row. When NOT softwrapping, showing a
"[" before the ">" kind of makes sense: to avoid having a gaping gap
there. But when softwrapping, all characters of the line will be on
the screen (except when going offscreen at the bottom), so there is
no need to show a placeholder for anything.
I imagine that when reading softwrapped Chinese or Japanese text,
things are easier to understand when no characters are shown that
are not actually in the text.
This avoids https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57993.
Bug existed since version 2.8.6, commit 8490f4ac.
When the user (unexpectedly) types a multibyte character after M-V,
put its first byte back into the keyboard buffer, so that the next
call of process_a_keystroke() will retrieve the byte sequence as a
whole, and will inject them as one character into the edit buffer.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57804.
Bug existed since version 2.6.3, commit 08c51cfd.
When the guiding stripe (when softwrapping) will be shown in
a later chunk, it shouldn't be shown in the current chunk.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57654.
Bug existed since --guidestripe was introduced, in version 4.0.
When having prepared a line for displaying on the screen, nano already
determind whether the line extends beyond the right edge or not. There
is no need to calculate again the full width of the current line later.
Just let display_string() make a note whether the piece of text that
it converted to displayable form still has more text coming after it,
and use this note when it's time to show the ">" continuation sign.
Using a static variable is ugly, but passing it along as a parameter
would be even uglier, because for all other calls of display_string()
the parameter would be just a useless burden.
(The diff is stupid. It should just remove 440 contiguous lines, and
add back 440 contiguous lines further down. Instead it tries to find
similarities between what is moved and what remains, and makes a mess.
You have to use --patience or --minimal to get the better diff.)
Any modifier keys that are needed to start the execution of a macro
(or of a string bind) should not affect the interpretation of the
keystrokes that are contained within the macro or the string.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57660.
Bug existed since macros were introduced, in version 2.9.0.
The Shift detection on a Linux console was meant to affect only the
dedicated cursor-movement keys, not <Shift+Meta+character>.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57598.
Indirectly-reported-by: Brand Huntsman <alpha@qzx.com>
As long as the user does not define any Sh-M-X bindings in their nanorc,
<Shift> and <CapsLock> will not have any effect on <Alt+letter> combos.
But as soon as any Sh-M-X combination is bound, <Shift+Alt+letter> will
be seen as different from the unshifted keystroke.
This kind of fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54659.
Requested-by: Peter Passchier <peter@passchier.net>
This is a workaround for the VT not being able to handle zero-width
characters properly, displaying them mistakenly as visible characters.
This avoids https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52954.
The problem has existed since forever, but has become noticeable
since the capability for line numbers was added in version 2.7.1.
Benno Schulenberg