Conflicts:
- app/controllers/admin/base_controller.rb
- app/controllers/filters_controller.rb
- app/controllers/invites_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/deletes_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/exports_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/follower_domains_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/migrations_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/notifications_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/preferences_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/two_factor_authentication/recovery_codes_controller.rb
- app/javascript/packs/public.js
- app/views/settings/profiles/show.html.haml
Conflicts were mostly due to the addition of body classes to the settings page,
this was caused by rejecting upstream changes for most of those files and
modifying Settings::BaseController instead.
Another cause of conflicts was the deletion of client-side checking of
display name / bio length, this was modified in app/javascript/core/settings.js
instead.
Conflicts:
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Took our version.
- CONTRIBUTING.md
Updated the embedded copy of upstream's version.
- README.md
Took our version.
- app/policies/status_policy.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
- app/views/layouts/embedded.html.haml
Added upstream's changes (dns-prefetch) and fixed
`%body.embed`
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Reverted some of upstream changes, as we have a
page dedicated for flavours and skins.
- config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb
Kept our version of the CSP.
- config/initializers/doorkeeper.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
* Add silent column to mentions
* Save silent mentions in ActivityPub Create handler and optimize it
Move networking calls out of the database transaction
* Add "limited" visibility level masked as "private" in the API
Unlike DMs, limited statuses are pushed into home feeds. The access
control rules between direct and limited statuses is almost the same,
except for counter and conversation logic
* Ensure silent column is non-null, add spec
* Ensure filters don't check silent mentions for blocks/mutes
As those are "this person is also allowed to see" rather than "this
person is involved", therefore does not warrant filtering
* Clean up code
* Use Status#active_mentions to limit returned mentions
* Fix code style issues
* Use Status#active_mentions in Notification
And remove stream_entry eager-loading from Notification
* Add conversations API
* Add web UI for conversations
* Add test for conversations API
* Add tests for ConversationAccount
* Improve web UI
* Rename ConversationAccount to AccountConversation
* Remove conversations on block and mute
* Change last_status_id to be a denormalization of status_ids
* Add optimistic locking
Conflicts:
db/migrate/20170716191202_add_hide_notifications_to_mute.rb
spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb
Took our version, upstream changes were only minor style linting.
Conflicts:
app/models/status.rb
db/migrate/20180528141303_fix_accounts_unique_index.rb
db/schema.rb
Resolved by taking upstream changes (no real conflicts, just glitch-soc
specific code too close to actual changes).
There were some concerns with the custom filter migration script dropping a table,
thus making it unsafe to run in a zero-downtime setting. Upstream introduced
a way to run migrations after deployment, so revisit the old migration script to
make use of this.
Conflicts:
app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb
app/javascript/mastodon/locales/pl.json
app/views/about/more.html.haml
Conflicts in `accounts_controller.rb` resolved by taking upstream's
version + our `use_pack`.
Conflicts in `pl.json` resolved by taking upstream's changes.
Conflicts in `aboute/more.html.haml` resolved by taking upstream's changes.
Conflicts:
Dockerfile
app/javascript/packs/common.js
config/webpack/loaders/sass.js
config/webpack/shared.js
db/schema.rb
package.json
yarn.lock
A lot of the conflicts come from updating webpack.
Even though upstream deleted app/javascript/packs/common.js, I kept
glitch-soc's version as it unifies JS/CSS packs behavior across flavours.
Ported glitch changes to webpack 4.x
Completely remove glitch-soc's Keyword Mutes, migrate
existing database records to CustomFilters.
Handling of client-side filters is still not implemented
in the glitch-soc front-end.
Conflicts:
README.md
app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb
app/lib/feed_manager.rb
config/navigation.rb
spec/lib/feed_manager_spec.rb
Conflicts were resolved by taking both versions for each change.
This means the two filter systems (glitch-soc's keyword mutes and tootsuite's
custom filters) are in place, which will be changed in a follow-up commit.
* Add keyword filtering
GET|POST /api/v1/filters
GET|PUT|DELETE /api/v1/filters/:id
- Irreversible filters can drop toots from home or notifications
- Other filters can hide toots through the client app
- Filters use a phrase valid in particular contexts, expiration
* Make sure expired filters don't get applied client-side
* Add missing API methods
* Remove "regex filter" from column settings
* Add tests
* Add test for FeedManager
* Add CustomFilter test
* Add UI for managing filters
* Add streaming API event to allow syncing filters
* Fix tests
Conflicts:
app/javascript/mastodon/initial_state.js
db/schema.rb
Upstream added a new field to initial_state.
Not too sure about what happened with db/schema.rb though…
Also add an apply_to_mentions attribute on Glitch::KeywordMute, which is
used to calculate scope. Next up: additions to the test suite to
demonstrate how scoping works.
Queries with the combination of account_id, id, and visibility can be
categorized in three types:
1. Querying for public and unlisted to enumerate statuses visible to
anyone.
2. Querying for public, unlisted, and private to enumerate statuses
visible to follower.
3. Querying for direct to enumerate own direct statuses.
1 and 2 is covered by the index with condition 'visibility IN (0, 1, 2)'.
It would bring better performance in case that there are many direct
statuses.
The index with condition 'visibility = 3' is just for 3. It would be much
faster to query direct statuses thanks to this query.
The total size of those two indexes are expected to be smaller than the
deleted one because they are partial and does not have to cover all the
table.
- POST /api/v1/push/subscription
- PUT /api/v1/push/subscription
- DELETE /api/v1/push/subscription
- New OAuth scope: "push" (required for the above methods)
Same URI passed between follow request and follow, since they are
the same thing in ActivityPub. Local URIs are generated during
creation using UUIDs and are passed to serializers.
Thibaut Girka