e.g., typing “blob_cat_p” used to search for “blob” and “cat”, but not
“blob_cat_p”, which means “blob_cat_patpat” is very unlikely to show up,
although it is likely what the user wanted to type in the first place.
Reminder: Suggestions were added in #7918 and are based on who you
interact with who you do not follow. E.g. if you boost someone a lot
from seeing other people's boosts of that person, it makes sense you
might be interested in following the original source; or if you reply
to someone a lot, maybe you'd want to follow them
Each suggestion can be dismissed
Conflicts:
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Took our version.
- CONTRIBUTING.md
Updated the embedded copy of upstream's version.
- README.md
Took our version.
- app/policies/status_policy.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
- app/views/layouts/embedded.html.haml
Added upstream's changes (dns-prefetch) and fixed
`%body.embed`
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Reverted some of upstream changes, as we have a
page dedicated for flavours and skins.
- config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb
Kept our version of the CSP.
- config/initializers/doorkeeper.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
Fixes#395
Instead of leaving the toot body blank, it replaces it with a single “.” in
order for the fold/unfold CW behavior to not look *too* weird on upstream
Mastodon. Note that this does not fix upstream's CW-dropping behavior, as
that is decided at the time the toot is posted, not received.
* Fix position of the domain label
* Fix position of the domain label for RTL
- Fix color mismatch of linear gradient which assigned to "::after" pseudo class
Indeed, when the “Always enable the Content Warning field” setting is enabled,
sending a content-less toot with a CW would move the CW to the toot's content
and leave the toot not marked as sensitive.
* Add silent column to mentions
* Save silent mentions in ActivityPub Create handler and optimize it
Move networking calls out of the database transaction
* Add "limited" visibility level masked as "private" in the API
Unlike DMs, limited statuses are pushed into home feeds. The access
control rules between direct and limited statuses is almost the same,
except for counter and conversation logic
* Ensure silent column is non-null, add spec
* Ensure filters don't check silent mentions for blocks/mutes
As those are "this person is also allowed to see" rather than "this
person is involved", therefore does not warrant filtering
* Clean up code
* Use Status#active_mentions to limit returned mentions
* Fix code style issues
* Use Status#active_mentions in Notification
And remove stream_entry eager-loading from Notification
Thibaut Girka