solver: report 'complete' solutions with errors

Allow to select packages that conflict in case we are looking for
errors. This allows 'add --force' to install (on boot) the set of
packages with minimum conflicts.
cute-signatures
Timo Teräs 2011-09-05 10:51:11 +03:00
parent 1fb1afc5c2
commit 0e24207c2e
5 changed files with 31 additions and 38 deletions

View File

@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#define APK_PKGSTF_BRANCH 2
#define APK_PKGSTF_ALT_BRANCH 4
#define APK_PKGSTF_INSTALLIF 8
#define APK_PKGSTF_DECIDED 16
struct apk_package_state {
struct apk_package *backtrack;
@ -219,17 +220,6 @@ static void foreach_dependency(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependenc
func(ss, &deps->item[i]);
}
static int inline can_consider_package(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_package_state *ps)
{
if (ps == NULL)
return FALSE;
if (ps->topology_hard > ss->topology_position)
return FALSE;
if (ps->conflicts)
return FALSE;
return TRUE;
}
static int get_pkg_expansion_flags(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_package *pkg)
{
struct apk_name *name = pkg->name;
@ -241,7 +231,10 @@ static int get_pkg_expansion_flags(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_packa
struct apk_package *pkg0 = name->pkgs->item[i];
struct apk_package_state *ps0 = pkg_to_ps(pkg0);
if (pkg0 == pkg || !can_consider_package(ss, ps0))
if (pkg0 == pkg || ps0 == NULL ||
ps0->topology_hard > ss->topology_position ||
(ps0->flags & APK_PKGSTF_DECIDED) ||
ps0->conflicts != 0)
continue;
if (apk_flags & APK_PREFER_AVAILABLE) {
@ -305,7 +298,9 @@ static int update_name_state(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
struct apk_package *pkg0 = name->pkgs->item[i];
struct apk_package_state *ps0 = pkg_to_ps(pkg0);
if (!can_consider_package(ss, ps0))
if (ps0 == NULL ||
ps0->topology_hard >= ss->topology_position ||
(ps0->flags & APK_PKGSTF_DECIDED))
continue;
if (ns->requirers == 0 && ns->install_ifs != 0 &&
@ -334,14 +329,15 @@ static int update_name_state(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
} else
ns->flags &= ~APK_NAMESTF_NO_OPTIONS;
if (options == 0 || (ns->requirers == 0 && ns->install_ifs == 0)) {
if ((options == 0 && skipped_options == 0) ||
(ns->requirers == 0 && ns->install_ifs == 0)) {
if (list_hashed(&ns->unsolved_list)) {
list_del(&ns->unsolved_list);
list_init(&ns->unsolved_list);
ns->chosen = NULL;
}
dbg_printf("%s: deleted from unsolved: %d requirers, %d install_ifs, %d options\n",
name->name, ns->requirers, ns->install_ifs, options);
dbg_printf("%s: deleted from unsolved: %d requirers, %d install_ifs, %d options, %d skipped\n",
name->name, ns->requirers, ns->install_ifs, options, skipped_options);
} else {
dbg_printf("%s: added to unsolved: %d requirers, %d install_ifs, %d options (next topology %d)\n",
name->name, ns->requirers, ns->install_ifs, options,
@ -351,7 +347,7 @@ static int update_name_state(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
ns->chosen = best_pkg;
}
return options;
return options + skipped_options;
}
static void trigger_install_if(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
@ -391,6 +387,7 @@ static void apply_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
if (ps->flags & APK_PKGSTF_INSTALL) {
ss->assigned_names++;
ss->cur_unsatisfiable += ps->conflicts;
ns->chosen = pkg;
ns->flags |= APK_NAMESTF_LOCKED;
@ -402,7 +399,6 @@ static void apply_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
foreach_dependency(ss, pkg->depends, apply_constraint);
foreach_rinstall_if_pkg(ss, pkg, trigger_install_if);
} else {
ps->conflicts++;
update_name_state(ss, pkg->name, ns, 0);
}
}
@ -416,7 +412,6 @@ static void undo_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
dbg_printf("undo_decision: " PKG_VER_FMT " %s\n", PKG_VER_PRINTF(pkg),
(ps->flags & APK_PKGSTF_INSTALL) ? "INSTALL" : "NO_INSTALL");
ss->cur_unsatisfiable = ps->cur_unsatisfiable;
if (ps->flags & APK_PKGSTF_INSTALLIF)
ss->topology_position = ps->topology_soft;
else
@ -430,10 +425,9 @@ static void undo_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
ns->flags &= ~APK_NAMESTF_LOCKED;
ns->chosen = NULL;
} else {
ps->conflicts--;
}
ss->cur_unsatisfiable = ps->cur_unsatisfiable;
update_name_state(ss, pkg->name, ns, 0);
}
@ -443,7 +437,7 @@ static void push_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_package *pkg,
struct apk_package_state *ps = pkg_to_ps(pkg);
ps->backtrack = ss->latest_decision;
ps->flags = flags;
ps->flags = flags | APK_PKGSTF_DECIDED;
ps->cur_unsatisfiable = ss->cur_unsatisfiable;
if (ps->topology_soft < ss->topology_position) {
@ -480,10 +474,10 @@ static int next_branch(struct apk_solver_state *ss)
undo_decision(ss, pkg, ps);
if (ps->flags & APK_PKGSTF_ALT_BRANCH) {
pkg = ps->backtrack;
ss->latest_decision = pkg;
dbg_printf("next_branch: undo decision at topology_position %d\n",
ss->topology_position);
ps->flags &= ~(APK_PKGSTF_ALT_BRANCH | APK_PKGSTF_DECIDED);
ss->latest_decision = ps->backtrack;
} else {
dbg_printf("next_branch: swapping BRANCH at topology_position %d\n",
ss->topology_position);
@ -512,7 +506,7 @@ static void apply_constraint(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependency
dbg_printf(PKG_VER_FMT " selected already for %s\n",
PKG_VER_PRINTF(ns->chosen), dep->name->name);
if (!apk_dep_is_satisfied(dep, ns->chosen))
ss->cur_unsatisfiable += 200;
ss->cur_unsatisfiable++;
return;
}
@ -615,9 +609,11 @@ static void record_solution(struct apk_solver_state *ss)
pkg = ss->latest_decision;
while (pkg != NULL) {
ps = pkg_to_ps(pkg);
if ((ps->flags & APK_PKGSTF_INSTALL) &&
(ps->conflicts == 0))
if (ps->flags & APK_PKGSTF_INSTALL) {
if (i >= ss->assigned_names)
abort();
ss->best_solution->item[i++] = pkg;
}
dbg_printf("record_solution: " PKG_VER_FMT ": %sINSTALL\n",
PKG_VER_PRINTF(pkg),
@ -656,9 +652,12 @@ int apk_solver_solve(struct apk_database *db, struct apk_dependency_array *world
foreach_dependency(ss, world, apply_constraint);
do {
if (ss->allow_errors || ss->cur_unsatisfiable < ss->best_unsatisfiable) {
if (ss->allow_errors ||
ss->cur_unsatisfiable < ss->best_unsatisfiable) {
r = expand_branch(ss);
if (r) {
dbg_printf("solution with %d unsatisfiable\n",
ss->cur_unsatisfiable);
if (ss->cur_unsatisfiable == 0) {
/* found solution - it is optimal because we permutate
* each preferred local option first, and permutations

View File

@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
3 unsatisfiable dependencies (solution with 3 names)
2 unsatisfiable dependencies (solution with 4 names)
world: d>1.5
b-1: d<2.0
c-1: d>1.0

View File

@ -1,5 +1,2 @@
4 unsatisfiable dependencies (solution with 3 names)
world: d<1.5
a-3: d>1.5
b-1: d<2.0
1 unsatisfiable dependencies (solution with 4 names)
c-1: d>1.0

View File

@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
1 unsatisfiable dependencies (solution with 3 names)
1 unsatisfiable dependencies (solution with 4 names)
world: !b
a-3: b

View File

@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
3 unsatisfiable dependencies (solution with 3 names)
2 unsatisfiable dependencies (solution with 4 names)
a-3: d>1.5
b-1: d<2.0
c-1: d>1.0