95 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
95 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
|
% Libreboot Git repositories now on Codeberg (RIP Notabug)
|
||
|
|
% Leah Rowe
|
||
|
|
% 8 April 2023
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
RIP Notabug
|
||
|
|
===========
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Git repositories provided by Libreboot are still available via Notabug, but
|
||
|
|
the Notabug site has been quite unreliable for some time now. I notice it
|
||
|
|
mostly in the evenings, when more people are likely using it. Essentially, the
|
||
|
|
service is overloaded all the time and this results in regular HTTP 500 errors,
|
||
|
|
preventing pull requests, git clone, issue reports and other things to go
|
||
|
|
offline at random times.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I kept Libreboot on Notabug for as long as possible, because I hoped that the
|
||
|
|
admin (single) would fix issues, but I can't keep waiting.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Libreboot was originally a member of the Peers Community, which hosts Notabug.
|
||
|
|
So I had an affinity for Notabug.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Libreboot repos now hosted by Codeberg
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I've decided to set up an account on Codeberg. You can find it here:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* <https://codeberg.org/libreboot>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
On this day, 8 April 2023, the following repositories are available via
|
||
|
|
Codeberg:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* Build system: <https://codeberg.org/libreboot/lbmk>
|
||
|
|
* Website (markdown files): <https://codeberg.org/libreboot/lbwww>
|
||
|
|
* Images (av.libreboot.org): <https://codeberg.org/libreboot/lbwww-img>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Codeberg has nicer features
|
||
|
|
---------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Codeberg runs on forgejo, itself a fork of Gitea, which *itself* is a fork
|
||
|
|
of Gogs. *Notabug* runs on an older, modified version of Gogs, which lacks a
|
||
|
|
lot of nicer features like issue search.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Codeberg's forgejo instance has issue search, and it has a nice CI built in,
|
||
|
|
namely *woodpecker*. All of this and more could be useful to Libreboot, and
|
||
|
|
is being looked into.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The interface is virtually identical to that of Notabug, since it's based
|
||
|
|
upon the same original codebase. Links on libreboot.org have been updated.
|
||
|
|
You can send issue reports and pull requests in much the same way as before,
|
||
|
|
but you will need to make a new account on codeberg.org if you don't already
|
||
|
|
have one.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notabug still available
|
||
|
|
-----------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The notabug repositories are *still* available, and I'll still push new code
|
||
|
|
to them. I push to several repositories, not just codeberg/notabug, but those
|
||
|
|
are the ones that I openly advertise.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notabug is *usually* available, but it is often overloaded in the evenings,
|
||
|
|
so it's no longer viable for production use, but it's still viable as a backup.
|
||
|
|
If codeberg is ever down, at least you'd be able to download from Notabug.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Why not self-host?
|
||
|
|
==================
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Forgejo, based on Gitea, is what runs on Codeberg. They host the project, on
|
||
|
|
behalf of the developers. Forgejo is working on federating the git forge, so
|
||
|
|
that mastodon-like features are available (pull requests, issues and such).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Until federated collaboration is possible in Git (via the web), it's simply
|
||
|
|
not viable for a small project like Libreboot to provide a self-hosted
|
||
|
|
instance, because it would mean that people have to make an account on the
|
||
|
|
site *just* for Libreboot. This seems unreasonable as a request. Lots of
|
||
|
|
people are on codeberg, and already have accounts.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Codeberg is run by a non-profit organisation that seems pretty solid, with
|
||
|
|
donations infrastructure too, so they'll probably always have the resources
|
||
|
|
to manage the service effectively.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When federation becomes available, I assume Codeberg's forgejo instance will
|
||
|
|
become part of that, so it just makes practical sense for Libreboot to
|
||
|
|
use Codeberg.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Why not sourcehut?
|
||
|
|
------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I considered sourcehut. I like the concept of it (mailing lists made easier,
|
||
|
|
email-based collaboration) but I don't think most people will want to use that.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Forgejo provides a web-based interface in a style that most people are used to.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Libreboot is *not* hosted on sourcehut, officially, in any capacity.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
That is all.
|