faq: fix up sentence about xhci fw
parent
418e003cc8
commit
11de95a8c6
|
@ -891,8 +891,9 @@ as well as a computer.
|
||||||
Based on this, it's safe to say that use of USB instead of SATA is
|
Based on this, it's safe to say that use of USB instead of SATA is
|
||||||
advisable if security is a concern. USB 2.0 has plenty of bandwidth for
|
advisable if security is a concern. USB 2.0 has plenty of bandwidth for
|
||||||
many HDDs (a few high-end ones can use more bandwidth than USB 2.0 is
|
many HDDs (a few high-end ones can use more bandwidth than USB 2.0 is
|
||||||
capable of), but for SSDs it might be problematic (unless you're using
|
capable of), but for SSDs it might be problematic. USB 3.0 will provide more
|
||||||
USB 3.0, which is not yet usable in freedom. See
|
reasonable performance, though note that depending on the system, you may have
|
||||||
|
to deal with binary blob XHCI firmware in your kernel (if that bothers you).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Use of USB is also not an absolute guarantee of safety, so do beware.
|
Use of USB is also not an absolute guarantee of safety, so do beware.
|
||||||
The attack surface becomes much smaller, but a malicious drive could
|
The attack surface becomes much smaller, but a malicious drive could
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue