new new hampshire bill
parent
8f7b3ee76f
commit
389f0a7084
|
@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
|||
usa-libre-part2.md
|
||||
fedfree.md
|
||||
libreboot20221214.md
|
||||
merge.md
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
|
|||
% New Hampshire once again on the cusp of enshrining Software Freedom into law
|
||||
% Leah Rowe
|
||||
% 12 February 2023
|
||||
|
||||
Introduction
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
This article makes use of the term *libre software*, which has the same meaning
|
||||
as more popular terms such as *open source software* or *free software*
|
||||
or *free and open source software*. More information can be found about
|
||||
it [here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source) - to the Libreboot
|
||||
project, this is important because it talks about your *freedom* to study,
|
||||
adapt, share and re-use software as you see fit, alongside the rest of
|
||||
humanity in a collective development effort, as opposed to the alternative
|
||||
where we would be restricted by companies like Microsoft or Apple, who only
|
||||
care about *controlling us* to make money.
|
||||
|
||||
You may recall last year's article: [New Hampshire (USA) may soon enshrine
|
||||
Software Freedom into law](usa-libre.md) - a proposed bill, if it passed,
|
||||
would have provided official legal protections in favour of libre software in
|
||||
the state of New Hampshire, in the United States. The bill didn't pass, largely
|
||||
because of a complaint that the bill was too all-encompassing, and so the idea
|
||||
then was that the bill should be split into a series of smaller bills that, in
|
||||
combination, achieve the same goals.
|
||||
|
||||
Since then, Eric Gallager (the representative behind the original bill) in
|
||||
New Hampshire has done exactly that, and a new hearing takes place very soon,
|
||||
on the *16th of February, 2023, at 1PM*.
|
||||
|
||||
I once again call to action, any person that lives in New Hampshire or the
|
||||
surrounding states in the USA. Your participation could help secure the rights
|
||||
of all libre software users and developers, well into the future. I myself do
|
||||
not live in the US, so I'm hoping that my American readers will listen well to
|
||||
what I have to say.
|
||||
|
||||
With your help, libre software could suddenly find itself in a much stronger
|
||||
position, with more users and more developers, encouraged by such positive
|
||||
changes.
|
||||
|
||||
When, who, what and where?
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Eric Gallager, the representative behind the previous bill, has continued his
|
||||
efforts and now has a new hearing for the following bill very soon:
|
||||
|
||||
* **16 February 2023, 1PM**: prohibiting, with limited exceptions, state
|
||||
agencies from requiring use of proprietary software in interactions with the
|
||||
public (house bill: HB 617-FN)
|
||||
|
||||
The text of the proposed bill can be read here: \
|
||||
<https://gencourt.state.nh.us/lsr_search/billText.aspx?id=188&type=4>
|
||||
|
||||
It is critical that as many people show up as possible, to express support for
|
||||
the bill, and to defend it against any opposition that may appear, on each day.
|
||||
|
||||
**Location of hearing: Legislative Office Building in Concord, New Hampshire:\
|
||||
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Hampshire_Legislative_Office_Building>**
|
||||
|
||||
The bill's hearing shall take place in room 306-308.
|
||||
|
||||
Who to contact
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
Eric Gallager is the representative in charge of the proposed bill, and you can
|
||||
contact him in the following ways:
|
||||
|
||||
Email address: \
|
||||
[Eric.Gallager@leg.state.nh.us](mailto:Eric.Gallager@leg.state.nh.us)
|
||||
|
||||
Mastodon page: \
|
||||
<https://social.treehouse.systems/@egallager>
|
||||
|
||||
Twitter page (use of Twitter is ill advised, due
|
||||
to its proprietary nature - use Mastodon or email if you can): \
|
||||
<https://twitter.com/cooljeanius>
|
||||
|
||||
Why should you support this bill?
|
||||
=================================
|
||||
|
||||
If this newly proposed bill is passed, it will provide the libre software
|
||||
movement a *foot in the door*, that could lead to greater reform at a later
|
||||
date, and strengthen the entire movement. This is because of the knock-on
|
||||
effect it would have: as more people benefit from it, more states (in the US)
|
||||
and countries outside of the US may follow, implementing similar laws.
|
||||
|
||||
Laws are often made that reduce our freedoms. If any law should be passed, it
|
||||
should be a law that strengthens or otherwise reaffirms civil liberties, which
|
||||
is what the proposed bill aims to do.
|
||||
|
||||
Libre software is about civil liberties, as it pertains to computer science,
|
||||
because of the *right to learn* and the *right to read*. Just as mathematics
|
||||
or physics should be free for anyone to study and make use of, so too should
|
||||
that be the case for computer science.
|
||||
|
||||
Any civil liberties that we have today are the result of *laws* that protect
|
||||
them, because the purpose of law is to provide punishment for violation; if
|
||||
no law exists, for or against something, then no punishment can take place.
|
||||
For example, most countries have a law that says you should not be robbed; if
|
||||
someone then robs you, then they get punished with jail time. The right to
|
||||
private property is an important right.
|
||||
|
||||
If no laws exist that protect libre software projects, then they are
|
||||
vulnerable.
|
||||
|
||||
Just as you should have the right to property, you must also have the right to
|
||||
pursue a happy, productive life - the right, in practise, to work on libre
|
||||
software should be part of that, if computer science is something you're
|
||||
interested in.
|
||||
|
||||
This right *also pertains to property*, specifically the property that is your
|
||||
computational devices; tablets, PCs (desktops, laptops), whatever you use.
|
||||
Libre software lets you truly *own* your computer, because it doesn't leave
|
||||
you beholden to a *licensor*. You have the right to study, adapt, share and
|
||||
re-use the software infinitely, and other people also have this right. With
|
||||
libre software, your computer is no longer a *product* for a specific purpose
|
||||
per se, but rather, a general purpose machine that can be reprogrammed
|
||||
for *any purpose as you see fit*. This is similar to your right to have your
|
||||
car modified, or repaired by anyone, including you, or perhaps your right to
|
||||
reorganise (even completely re-build) your house.
|
||||
|
||||
The proposed bill's hearing, on the 16th, regards the usage of proprietary
|
||||
software by state agencies. *State agencies* could include schools run by the
|
||||
state, but it could also include things like your local tax office. When you
|
||||
file taxes, it is often the case that it cannot be done without running some
|
||||
proprietary software, and many schools will insist that their students use
|
||||
Windows (or other proprietary OS) rather than, say, Linux or BSD. By mandating
|
||||
in law that people should be able to use *libre* software, it will create a
|
||||
level playing field, because the state would *have to* make accomodation for
|
||||
libre software; while initially a burden (time and money spent), it would be
|
||||
a huge social boon later on, because if states stop relying on proprietary
|
||||
software licenses, the money they currently spend on that can instead be spent
|
||||
elsewhere, or on paying programmers, providing *better software* to the public;
|
||||
the actual overall cost may be exactly the same as today, but with more
|
||||
benefits for everyone, not to mention greater freedoms for computer users.
|
||||
|
||||
To put it simply: the right to your (computational) property would be enhanced
|
||||
by this bill's passage, by forcing the state to support libre software, against
|
||||
the whims of proprietary software vendors. This, like anything that strengthens
|
||||
the libre software movement, would increase the likelihood that you can actually
|
||||
use libre software, on computers that you buy in the future, which means that
|
||||
your *right to your own property* is enhanced, because at the end of the day,
|
||||
that's exactly what *software freedom* is all about.
|
||||
|
||||
We can all agree about education. The idea that people should be able to learn
|
||||
and grow as people is natural, and we all want to better ourselves. Libre
|
||||
software is an important part of that, in the field of computer science.
|
||||
We can also agree about private property.
|
||||
|
||||
What about money? Is this not an important part too? Is it not true that, with
|
||||
private property, you can also have *private enterprise*?
|
||||
|
||||
Libre software is very *profitable*, to a far greater extent than proprietary
|
||||
software. When the free exchange of ideas and knowledge is permitted to flow,
|
||||
innovation is much more likely. We can talk all day about the right to education
|
||||
but money matters too. Many software developers *learn* on libre software,
|
||||
because that is the only way to get really good with computers. You can't become
|
||||
a competent programmer by using Windows or MacOS. Linux or BSD are your only
|
||||
real choice, because that's where all the interesting development happens.
|
||||
Today's most profitable industries are powered by libre software; without
|
||||
it, we would be living in a very different world today, locked down by the
|
||||
likes of Microsoft or Apple who see software as a *product*, a *means to an
|
||||
end*, rather than the end in itself, that end being knowledge and
|
||||
self-empowerment. Technology has given us many freedoms today, thanks to the
|
||||
tireless efforts of libre software developers everywhere.
|
||||
|
||||
For example: nearly every website you visit runs on some Linux or BSD system,
|
||||
probably running the Apache web server, or (much more common nowadays) nginx.
|
||||
Windows just doesn't scale as a *server* OS, it is completely inflexible, but
|
||||
linux and bsd systems can be tweaked to do whatever you want.
|
||||
|
||||
When I say *libre software is profitable*, I'm not referring to Microsoft
|
||||
or Apple's profits. No, I'm referring to *yours*. With libre software, *you*
|
||||
have the freedom to make real money; I'm just one of many examples of people
|
||||
who do just that. With *software freedom*, you can take existing technology
|
||||
and build something completely new that becomes the Next Best Thing; everyone
|
||||
else has this freedom aswell, and people share knowledge freely because of the
|
||||
culture that type of world inspires. It's the world we live in, now.
|
||||
|
||||
The people of New Hampshire will benefit greatly, if such freedoms are
|
||||
enshrined in law. It will be a huge success, and it will lead to more
|
||||
jurisdictions (both within and outside the US) to follow suit. It will lead to
|
||||
the *end* of monopoly powers like Microsoft or Apple, completely opening up
|
||||
the entire body of knowledge to everyone, because that will become the norm;
|
||||
hoarding knowledge will become *unprofitable*, because the new culture would
|
||||
simply not allow it, so companies like Microsoft and Apple, if they want to
|
||||
remain relevant, would have to start releasing more source code themselves,
|
||||
rather than keeping everything proprietary. The people of the world will stop
|
||||
seeing them as a gold standard; they are not, and have never been. Libre
|
||||
software has always been superior, in every way, to proprietary software,
|
||||
because it allows you to actually *own* the computer you bought, in practise
|
||||
and in spirit.
|
||||
|
||||
Proprietary software is like renting a house; you have a license to use it,
|
||||
but you don't have the freedom to really change anything, and the licensor
|
||||
(equivalent to a landlord) can pull the plug at any time. Libre software, on
|
||||
the other hand, is equivalent to owning a house. When you run all libre software
|
||||
on your computer, *you* control that computer. You can modify whatever you want,
|
||||
or pay whoever you want to do that for you, to maintain everything for you,
|
||||
and you can share your work with others, something which other people already
|
||||
do; it's the reason libre software is so successful, precisely that people
|
||||
share their knowledge.
|
||||
|
||||
The state is an important part of our lives, no matter which country or
|
||||
jurisdiction we live in. We interact with it constantly, for services that we
|
||||
all rely on, so it is important that we should be *able to* with the software
|
||||
of our choice. This is why it's so important that the state, in any
|
||||
jurisdiction, take steps to ensure that libre software users don't get left
|
||||
behind. If passed, this will will strongly reinforce the *right* of computer
|
||||
users everywhere, to their own computational property.
|
||||
|
||||
Please, please please if you can take time out of your day, then please show
|
||||
up to to defend this bill and make sure that it gets passed!
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue