From 44471f81a3091ca26c3d99ec7ff417b8f07e37a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leah Rowe Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:17:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] remove unnecessary statement the statement does not pertain to libreboot, and pertains to a very divisive topic that libreboot need not cover at all; it was only used as an analogy, to describe another point, but let's just remove it. people get it, anyway. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe --- site/news/10.md | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/site/news/10.md b/site/news/10.md index e358bd0..fc2c875 100644 --- a/site/news/10.md +++ b/site/news/10.md @@ -534,10 +534,7 @@ happen with GNU membership. There is *another* freedom that exists, namely the freedom to say no. I reclaimed this freedom, by removing Libreboot from GNU. I realised that if Libreboot stayed in GNU for too long, then I would start to -lose control over the project as it became more associated. It's like when a -country joins the EU, because it is initially seduced by promises of economic -prosperity, only to later realise that large swathes of domestic and foreign -policy are now under the control of foreign governments. I had been deciding +lose control over the project as it became more associated. I had been deciding already, early into Libreboot's membership, whether to reverse the decision and take Libreboot out of GNU, thereby making it an independent project again. You could try to assert control by doing good work, but eventually everything