remove redundant paragraph, and fix one more typo
parent
17215ef33c
commit
7160bb5f0f
|
@ -234,11 +234,6 @@ high CPU usage and I/O (RAM usage), without crashing (otherwise, it's very
|
|||
likely to encounter a kernel panic caused by a
|
||||
[Machine Check Exception](faq.html#machine-check-exceptions-on-some-montevina-penryn-cpu-laptops)).
|
||||
|
||||
Leah Rowe policy is to include microcode updates, *by default*, because they
|
||||
do not affect software freedom in practise, since the only other "choice" is
|
||||
*broken, buggy* microcode. This is not a choice, it is a prison, and a less
|
||||
comfortable prison is clearly inferior.
|
||||
|
||||
Not including these updates will result in an unstable/undefined state. Intel
|
||||
themselves define which bugs affect which CPUs, and they define workarounds, or
|
||||
provide fixes in microcode. Based on this, software such as the Linux kernel
|
||||
|
@ -297,7 +292,7 @@ policy of Libreboot, my own project. I am horrified by the technically
|
|||
incorrect monstrosity that I created, so I did osboot to make me feel better.
|
||||
It is far superior to Libreboot, in every way, because it still can (*and does*)
|
||||
support the same hardware, but it lacks dogma. The osboot project takes a more
|
||||
pragmatic approach to freedom, that is completely in line with my action views.
|
||||
pragmatic approach to freedom, that is completely in line with my actual views.
|
||||
*Libreboot is inferior*.
|
||||
|
||||
However, I will say:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue