From 77198f7f5dc5a972ef5181751db26d5c69773db7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leah Rowe Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 02:35:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] grammar Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe --- site/news/10.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/site/news/10.md b/site/news/10.md index da254d8..55cc695 100644 --- a/site/news/10.md +++ b/site/news/10.md @@ -1605,10 +1605,10 @@ In general, Libreboot's [Binary Blob Reduction Policy](policy.md) dictates that if Free Software *can* be used, it must be - as a result, many systems supported by Libreboot, boot entirely with free software. Libreboot is a free software project, whose primary goal is to increase software freedoms for users -by providing them with free boot firmware. And yet: GNU talk strongly +by providing them with free boot firmware. And yet: the GNU talk strongly suggests that Libreboot is a *proprietary software project*. -In GNU talk, they directly state that I, Leah Rowe, am "against 100% +In that same GNU talk, GNU directly states that I, Leah Rowe, am "against 100% free software" - also false. I want everyone to use Free Software exclusively, but the reality is that this is literally impossible, on any hardware. The reason is strongly described in Libreboot's [Freedom Status](../freedom-status.md)