From 7f1f5ccc64b767ede1a56362d67d353d7ed1a4b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leah Rowe Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:21:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] correction --- site/news/gnuboot.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/site/news/gnuboot.md b/site/news/gnuboot.md index 108e0ea..b9864c8 100644 --- a/site/news/gnuboot.md +++ b/site/news/gnuboot.md @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ Distribution Guidelines), talking favourably about FSF/GNU, and so on. I'm in a position to *do it* (thus scratching the itch), so why not? **I did this release for them: -** - it's designated *GNU +** - it's designated *GNU Boot 20230717*, and I encourage them to re-use this in their project, to get off the ground. This completely leapfrogs their current development; it's months ahead. *Months*. **It's 8 months ahead**, since their current revision @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ Happy hacking! UPDATE (21 July 2023) ===================== -This non-GeNUine Boot website, and the non-GeNUine release itself, +The non-GeNUine Boot website, and the non-GeNUine release itself, was originally *named* GNU Boot, but clearly marked as *unofficial*, with the hope that the GNU project would adapt and re-use it for their project. I did this, specifically to help them get up to date. They currently use Libreboot @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ Libreboot and even older coreboot. Anyway, I complied with their polite request and have renamed the project to non-GeNUine Boot. The release archive was re-compiled, under this new brand -name and this non-GeNUine website was re-written accordingly. +name and the website was re-written accordingly. Personally, I like the new name better.