From a84ab5fe7a095825ca0deba63adef17d4cfea432 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leah Rowe Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 02:03:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix errant references Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe --- site/news/10.md | 9 +++++---- site/template.de.include | 1 - site/template.include | 1 - site/template.it.include | 1 - site/template.uk.include | 1 - site/template.zh-cn.include | 1 - 6 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/site/news/10.md b/site/news/10.md index 3594b5b..0b03b84 100644 --- a/site/news/10.md +++ b/site/news/10.md @@ -1265,8 +1265,9 @@ available. Many of Libreboot's early years were turbulent, and I never expected then that the project would last 5 years, let alone 10. Anyway: I actually don't need to go into detail about GNU Boot, because I -already wrote about it in the [GNU Boot](gnuboot.md) article. I will summarise -it here, and perhaps share additional details: +already wrote about it on the [Canoeboot vs GNU +Boot](https://canoeboot.org/gnuboot.html) article. I will summarise it here, and +perhaps share additional details: Initial hostile fork -------------------- @@ -1337,8 +1338,8 @@ that they use it. It's a name that I myself came up with several years prior, when I was considering whether to work for GNU again *myself*, but as an actual fork of coreboot. The name just works. -They did rename, to GNU Boot. You can learn more about GNU Boot, by reading -the [GNU Boot article](gnuboot.md). +They did rename, to GNU Boot. You can learn more about GNU Boot on a technical +level, by reading the [GNU Boot vs Canoeboot page](https://canoeboot.org/gnuboot.html). The points raised in the GNU Boot article are *still valid* on today, 12 December 2023. GNU Boot 0.1 RC3 is imminent for release, on this day, and it diff --git a/site/template.de.include b/site/template.de.include index 8bd5027..223bd13 100644 --- a/site/template.de.include +++ b/site/template.de.include @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ $endif$