Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, just a glitch-soc-only dependency too close to a
dependency that got updated upstream. Updated as well.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Not a real conflict, just a change too close to glitch-soc-changed code
for optionally showing boosts in public timelines.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Upstream a new, static CSS file, conflict due to glitch-soc's theming
system, include the file regardless of the theme.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream dropped 'unsafe-inline' from the 'style-src' directive, but
both files are very different. Removed 'unsafe-inline' as well.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, just a glitch-soc-only dependency too close to a
dependency that got updated upstream. Updated as well.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Not a real conflict, just a change too close to glitch-soc-changed code
for optionally showing boosts in public timelines.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Upstream a new, static CSS file, conflict due to glitch-soc's theming
system, include the file regardless of the theme.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream dropped 'unsafe-inline' from the 'style-src' directive, but
both files are very different. Removed 'unsafe-inline' as well.
Conflicts:
- package.json
Not really a conflict, caused by an additional dependency in glitch-soc.
- yarn.lock
Not really a conflict, caused by an additional dependency in glitch-soc.
Conflicts:
- package.json
Not really a conflict, caused by an additional dependency in glitch-soc.
- yarn.lock
Not really a conflict, caused by an additional dependency in glitch-soc.
Conflicts:
- app/models/media_attachment.rb
Upstream raised max image size from 8MB to 10MB while our limit is
configurable. Raised the default to 10MB.
Conflicts:
- app/models/media_attachment.rb
Upstream raised max image size from 8MB to 10MB while our limit is
configurable. Raised the default to 10MB.
Conflicts:
- app/models/media_attachment.rb
Upstream added audio attachment support
- app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb
Upstream added audio attachment support and how mimetypes are returned
- app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb
Upstream added a few fields
- config/application.rb
Upstream added a different paperclip transcoder
Conflicts:
- app/models/media_attachment.rb
Upstream added audio attachment support
- app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb
Upstream added audio attachment support and how mimetypes are returned
- app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb
Upstream added a few fields
- config/application.rb
Upstream added a different paperclip transcoder
Added several vars that are already implemented to the .env.production.sample file.
-Max bio character limit
-Number of profile fields allowed
-Max display name character limit
Added several vars that are already implemented to the .env.production.sample file.
-Max bio character limit
-Number of profile fields allowed
-Max display name character limit
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb
minor conflict because of glitch-soc's theming system
- app/controllers/stream_entries_controller.rb
minor conflict because of glitch-soc's theming system
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb
minor conflict because of glitch-soc's theming system
- app/controllers/stream_entries_controller.rb
minor conflict because of glitch-soc's theming system
Conflicts:
app/views/layouts/application.html.haml
Edited:
app/helpers/application_helper.rb
app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml
Conflict wasn't really one, just two changes too close to one another.
Edition was to adapt the class names for themes to class names for
skins and flavours.
Also edited app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml to strip the
duplicate admin pack inclusion thing.
Conflicts:
app/views/layouts/application.html.haml
Edited:
app/helpers/application_helper.rb
app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml
Conflict wasn't really one, just two changes too close to one another.
Edition was to adapt the class names for themes to class names for
skins and flavours.
Also edited app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml to strip the
duplicate admin pack inclusion thing.
Conflicts:
app/models/status.rb
db/migrate/20180528141303_fix_accounts_unique_index.rb
db/schema.rb
Resolved by taking upstream changes (no real conflicts, just glitch-soc
specific code too close to actual changes).
Conflicts:
app/models/status.rb
db/migrate/20180528141303_fix_accounts_unique_index.rb
db/schema.rb
Resolved by taking upstream changes (no real conflicts, just glitch-soc
specific code too close to actual changes).
Conflicts:
README.md
app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb
app/lib/feed_manager.rb
config/navigation.rb
spec/lib/feed_manager_spec.rb
Conflicts were resolved by taking both versions for each change.
This means the two filter systems (glitch-soc's keyword mutes and tootsuite's
custom filters) are in place, which will be changed in a follow-up commit.
Conflicts:
README.md
app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb
app/lib/feed_manager.rb
config/navigation.rb
spec/lib/feed_manager_spec.rb
Conflicts were resolved by taking both versions for each change.
This means the two filter systems (glitch-soc's keyword mutes and tootsuite's
custom filters) are in place, which will be changed in a follow-up commit.
If Mastodon accesses to the hidden service via transparent proxy, it's needed to avoid checking whether it's a private address, since `.onion` is resolved to a private address.
I was previously using the `HIDDEN_SERVICE_VIA_TRANSPARENT_PROXY` to provide that function. However, I realized that using `HIDDEN_SERVICE_VIA_TRANSPARENT_PROXY` is redundant, since this specification is always used with `ALLOW_ACCESS_TO_HIDDEN_SERVICE`. Therefore, I decided to integrate the setting of `HIDDEN_SERVICE_VIA_TRANSPARENT_PROXY` into` ALLOW_ACCESS_TO_HIDDEN_SERVICE`.
If Mastodon accesses to the hidden service via transparent proxy, it's needed to avoid checking whether it's a private address, since `.onion` is resolved to a private address.
I was previously using the `HIDDEN_SERVICE_VIA_TRANSPARENT_PROXY` to provide that function. However, I realized that using `HIDDEN_SERVICE_VIA_TRANSPARENT_PROXY` is redundant, since this specification is always used with `ALLOW_ACCESS_TO_HIDDEN_SERVICE`. Therefore, I decided to integrate the setting of `HIDDEN_SERVICE_VIA_TRANSPARENT_PROXY` into` ALLOW_ACCESS_TO_HIDDEN_SERVICE`.
* Add support for HTTP client proxy
* Add access control for darknet
Supress error when access to darknet via transparent proxy
* Fix the codes pointed out
* Lint
* Fix an omission + lint
* any? -> include?
* Change detection method to regexp to avoid test fail
* Add support for HTTP client proxy
* Add access control for darknet
Supress error when access to darknet via transparent proxy
* Fix the codes pointed out
* Lint
* Fix an omission + lint
* any? -> include?
* Change detection method to regexp to avoid test fail
Thibaut Girka