Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/api/v1/statuses_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream adding a new parameter (with_rate_limit),
too close to glitch-soc's own additional parameter (content_type).
Added upstream's parameter.
- `app/services/post_status_service.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream adding a new parameter (rate_limit),
too close to glitch-soc's own additional parameter (content_type).
Added upstream's parameter.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Conflict due to us not exposing theme settings here (as we have
a different flavour/skin menu).
Took upstream change, while still not exposing theme settings.
- `config/webpack/shared.js`:
Coding style fixes for a part we have rewritten.
Discarded upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- app/services/remove_status_service.rb
Conflict because we still handle the direct timeline.
Took upstream changes, with that one extra function call.
- config/locales/ca.yml
Conflict because theme names were updated.
Decided to *keep* the theme names even if they are useless
to avoid future conflicts.
- config/locales/oc.yml
Decided to *keep* the theme names even if they are useless
to avoid future conflicts.
- config/locales/pl.yml
Decided to *keep* the theme names even if they are useless
to avoid future conflicts.
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/settings/follower_domains_controller.rb
Removed upstream. Did the same here. Maybe we should not have?
- config/locales/en.yml
Upstream removed the “Authorized followers” page and associated
translations. This is too close in the file to our glitch-soc-specific
“flavour” string. No actual conflict.
- config/locales/ja.yml
Same as above.
- config/locales/pl.yml
Same as above.
- config/navigation.rb
No real conflict. New route added too close to the glitch-soc-specific
“flavours” one.
- config/webpack/configuration.js
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
- config/webpack/loaders/babel.js
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
The contents of this file have been moved to package.json.
- config/webpack/shared.js
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
- config/webpacker.yml
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
- jest.config.js
The contents of this file have been moved to package.json.
- package.json
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
- yarn.lock
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
Webpacker (Ruby wrapper to webpack) uses RAILS_ENV-based environments while
the javascript configuration for webpack re-reads this configuration file using
the NODE_ENV environment variable. This means that when RAILS_ENV=test, running
“assets:precompile” compiled the production packs in “public/packs” while
webpacker expects them in “public/packs-test”. This causes Ruby to recompile
them on-the-fly, possibly leading to race conditions in parallel_tests.
This changes:
- Disables on-the-fly compilation in test environment
- Changes the javascript part to read the correct environment
Webpacker (Ruby wrapper to webpack) uses RAILS_ENV-based environments while
the javascript configuration for webpack re-reads this configuration file using
the NODE_ENV environment variable. This means that when RAILS_ENV=test, running
“assets:precompile” compiled the production packs in “public/packs” while
webpacker expects them in “public/packs-test”. This causes Ruby to recompile
them on-the-fly, possibly leading to race conditions in parallel_tests.
This changes:
- Disables on-the-fly compilation in test environment
- Changes the javascript part to read the correct environment
Conflicts:
app/views/layouts/application.html.haml
Edited:
app/helpers/application_helper.rb
app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml
Conflict wasn't really one, just two changes too close to one another.
Edition was to adapt the class names for themes to class names for
skins and flavours.
Also edited app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml to strip the
duplicate admin pack inclusion thing.
Conflicts:
Dockerfile
app/javascript/packs/common.js
config/webpack/loaders/sass.js
config/webpack/shared.js
db/schema.rb
package.json
yarn.lock
A lot of the conflicts come from updating webpack.
Even though upstream deleted app/javascript/packs/common.js, I kept
glitch-soc's version as it unifies JS/CSS packs behavior across flavours.
Ported glitch changes to webpack 4.x
Thibaut Girka