Deletions take a lot of resources to execute and cause a lot of
federation traffic, so it makes sense to decrease the number
someone can queue up through the API.
30 per 30 minutes
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/oauth/authorized_applications_controller.rb
Two changes too close to each other
- app/controllers/settings/sessions_controller.rb
- app/lib/user_settings_decorator.rb
Two changes too close to each other
- app/models/media_attachment.rb
New changes too close to glitch-soc only changes.
- app/models/user.rb
Two changes too close to each other.
- app/services/remove_status_service.rb
Kept direct timeline code which had been removed upstream.
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Two changes too close to each other.
- config/locales/en.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “flavour”
- config/locales/ja.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “flavour”
- config/locales/pl.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “flavour”
- config/locales/simple_form.en.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “skin”
- config/locales/simple_form.pl.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “skin”
- config/settings.yml
Reverted upstream's decision of enabling posting application by default.
Conflicts:
- .eslintrc.yml
Removed, as upstream removed it.
- app/controllers/admin/statuses_controller.rb
Minor code cleanup when porting one of our features.
- app/models/account.rb
Note length validation has changed upstream.
We now use upstream's validation (dropped legacy glitch-soc
account metadata stuff) but with configurable limit.
- app/services/post_status_service.rb
Upstream has added support for scheduled toots, refactoring
the code a bit. Adapted our changes to this refactoring.
- app/views/stream_entries/_detailed_status.html.haml
Not a real conflict, changes too close.
- app/views/stream_entries/_simple_status.html.haml
Not a real conflict, changes too close.
I also added "public" here, as I can't think of a good reason not to add it. Perhaps it has some marginal benefit in that ISPs (or other proxies) can cache it for all users. The assets are certainly publicly available and the same for all users.
* Add REST API for creating an account
The method is available to apps with a token obtained via the client
credentials grant. It creates a user and account records, as well as
an access token for the app that initiated the request. The user is
unconfirmed, and an e-mail is sent as usual.
The method returns the access token, which the app should save for
later. The REST API is not available to users with unconfirmed
accounts, so the app must be smart to wait for the user to click a
link in their e-mail inbox.
The method is rate-limited by IP to 5 requests per 30 minutes.
* Redirect users back to app from confirmation if they were created with an app
* Add tests
* Return 403 on the method if registrations are not open
* Require agreement param to be true in the API when creating an account
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/admin/base_controller.rb
- app/controllers/filters_controller.rb
- app/controllers/invites_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/deletes_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/exports_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/follower_domains_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/migrations_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/notifications_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/preferences_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/two_factor_authentication/recovery_codes_controller.rb
- app/javascript/packs/public.js
- app/views/settings/profiles/show.html.haml
Conflicts were mostly due to the addition of body classes to the settings page,
this was caused by rejecting upstream changes for most of those files and
modifying Settings::BaseController instead.
Another cause of conflicts was the deletion of client-side checking of
display name / bio length, this was modified in app/javascript/core/settings.js
instead.
Right now, this includes three endpoints: host-meta, webfinger, and change-password.
host-meta and webfinger are publicly available and do not use any authentication. Nothing bad can be done by accessing them in a user's browser.
change-password being CORS-enabled will only reveal the URL it redirects to (which is /auth/edit) but not anything about the actual /auth/edit page, because it does not have CORS enabled.
The documentation for hosting an instance on a different domain should also be updated to point out that Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * should be set at a minimum for the /.well-known/host-meta redirect to allow browser-based non-proxied instance discovery.
Conflicts:
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Took our version.
- CONTRIBUTING.md
Updated the embedded copy of upstream's version.
- README.md
Took our version.
- app/policies/status_policy.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
- app/views/layouts/embedded.html.haml
Added upstream's changes (dns-prefetch) and fixed
`%body.embed`
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Reverted some of upstream changes, as we have a
page dedicated for flavours and skins.
- config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb
Kept our version of the CSP.
- config/initializers/doorkeeper.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
Conflicts:
db/migrate/20170716191202_add_hide_notifications_to_mute.rb
spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb
Took our version, upstream changes were only minor style linting.
* Verify link ownership with rel="me"
* Add explanation about verification to UI
* Perform link verifications
* Add click-to-copy widget for verification HTML
* Redesign edit profile page
* Redesign forms
* Improve responsive design of settings pages
* Restore landing page sign-up form
* Fix typo
* Support <link> tags, add spec
* Fix links not being verified on first discovery and passive updates
CSFR-prevention is already implemented but adding this doesn't hurt.
A brief introduction to Same-Site cookies (and the difference between strict and
lax) can be found at
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2018/04/24/same-site-cookies-in-firefox-60/
TLDR: We use lax since we want the cookies to be sent when the user navigates
safely from an external site.
Thibaut Girka