Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Discarded upstream changes: we have our own README
- `app/controllers/follower_accounts_controller.rb`:
Port upstream's minor refactoring
* Added hadolint as Dockerfile linter in pipeline and resolved remaining hadolint issues in Dockerfile
* Use more specific version of hadolint Action
* Bumpt hadolint Action version to latest version to avoid deprecation notice
* Being _really_ specific now
Conflicts:
- `app/models/concerns/domain_materializable.rb`:
Fixed a code style issue upstream in a PR that got merged in glitch-soc
earlier.
Changed the code to match upstream's.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream changed how docker images were built, including how
they were cached.
I don't know much about it, so applied upstream's changes.
- `app/controllers/admin/domain_blocks_controller.rb`:
The feature, that was in glitch-soc, got backported upstream.
It also had a few fixes upstream, so those have been ported!
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Glitch-soc changes have been backported upstream. As a result,
some code from `app/javascript/core/admin.js` got added upstream.
Kept our version since our shared Javascript already has that feature.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream added something to distinguish unusable and unusable-because-moved
accounts, while glitch-soc considers moved accounts usable.
Took upstream's code for `functional_or_moved?` and made `functional?`
call it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream cleaned up code style a bit, on a line that we had custom changes
for.
Applied upstream's change while keeping our change.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream adopted one CSP directive we already had.
The conflict is because of our files being structurally different, but the
change itself was already part of glitch-soc.
Kept our version.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/announcements/edit.html.haml`:
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/admin/announcements/new.html.haml`
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/poll_form.js`:
glitch-soc change because of having changed the default number of
available poll options.
Applied upstream's changes while keeping glitch-soc's default number of
poll options.
- `public/oops.png`:
We had a minor graphics change, probably not worth diverging from upstream.
Took upstream version.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/home_controller.rb`:
Upstream made it so `/web` is available to non-logged-in users
and `/` redirects to `/web` instead of `/about`.
Kept our version since glitch-soc's WebUI doesn't have what's
needed yet and I think /about is still a much better landing
page anyway.
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Upstream added new settings, and glitch-soc had an extra setting.
Not really a conflict.
Added upstream's new settings.
- `app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb`:
Upstream added a new `server` initial state object.
Not really a conflict.
Merged upstream's changes.
- `app/views/admin/settings/edit.html.haml`:
Upstream added new settings.
Not really a conflict.
Merged upstream's changes.
- `app/workers/scheduler/feed_cleanup_scheduler.rb`:
Upstream refactored that part and removed the file.
Ported our relevant changes into `app/lib/vacuum/feeds_vacuum.rb`
- `config/settings.yml`:
Upstream added new settings.
Not a real conflict.
Added upstream's new settings.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Fix erroneous deletion in a previous merge.
- `Gemfile`:
Conflict caused by glitch-soc-only hCaptcha dependency
- `app/controllers/auth/sessions_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
- `app/controllers/filters_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
- `app/serializers/rest/status_serializer.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc having an extra `local_only` property
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Changed upstream, while we modified it in glitch-soc to not get spammed
by dependabot.
Kept it removed.
- `README.md`:
Changed upstream, which has a very different version.
Discarded upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/montserrat.scss`:
Code style changes upstream, path changes in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream's code style changes.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto-mono.scss`:
Code style changes upstream, path changes in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream's code style changes.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto.scss`:
Code style changes upstream, path changes in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream's code style changes.
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Textual conflict only caused by glitch-soc using a different value
for character limits in a nearby line.
Applied upstream's changes.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Attribute added to a tag modified by glitch-soc.
Added upstream's attributes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream added/updated dependencies close to glitch-soc-only ones.
Updated/added upstream dependencies.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream changed the workflow a bit.
Conflict comes from us pushing to ghcr while upstream pushes to dockerhub.
Ported the upstream changes while still pushing to ghcr.
Conflicts:
- `db/schema.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc adding the `content_type` column on status edits
and thus having a different schema version number.
Solved by taking upstream's schema version number, as it is higher than
glitch-soc's.
Claire