Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, just a glitch-soc-only dependency too close to a
dependency that got updated upstream. Updated as well.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Not a real conflict, just a change too close to glitch-soc-changed code
for optionally showing boosts in public timelines.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Upstream a new, static CSS file, conflict due to glitch-soc's theming
system, include the file regardless of the theme.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream dropped 'unsafe-inline' from the 'style-src' directive, but
both files are very different. Removed 'unsafe-inline' as well.
Change `account_link_to` to use an image tag rather than some
inline CSS. Dropped the `size` parameter in the process, but it wasn't
used for anything except the default value of 36px.
Dropped CSS rules that were always overriden, and defaulted to 36px width
and height instead.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb`:
Upstream disabled the embed controller for reblogs.
Not a real conflict, but glitch-soc has an extra line to deal
with its theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Upstream made changes to get rid of most inline CSS, this changes
javascript for public pages, which in glitch are split between
different files. Ported those changes.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream changed the block check in `Status#permitted_for` to
include domain-block checks. Not a real conflict with glitch-soc,
but our scope is slightly different, as our scope for
unauthenticated access do not include instance-local toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a new field to the instance
serializer, the conflict is one line above since we added more of
that.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/settings/profiles/show.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of most inline CSS and moved hidden elements
to data attributes in the process, in fields were we have
different values.
Ported upstream changes while keeping our glitch-specific
values.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of inline CSS on an HAML line we treat
differently, stripping empty text nodes.
Ported upstream changes to the style attribute, keeping
the empty text node stripping behavior.
* Move .back-button inline styles to CSS file
All occurrences of the back-button CSS class used the same inline
CSS rules, so moved them over to the CSS file
* Fix “Add new domain block” button using inline CSS
* Replace common pattern of inline-styled button boxes by a CSS class
In particular, switching from `float: left/right` to a flexbox with
`justify-content: space-between`. This implied changing the order of
a few HTML tags and adding an empty `div` in one case.
Also removed a `margin-bottom` rule that wasn't needed due to the
margins of surrounding elements.
* Move account admin view inline CSS to CSS file
* Move some inline styles to CSS files
* Move default_account_display_name span to fix useless tags with duplicate id
* Change handling of public pages spoiler text from inline CSS to dataset attribute
* Use the `dir` HTML attribute instead of inline CSS
* Move status action bar inline CSS to CSS file
* Hide logo resources from CSS file, not inline CSS
Fixes#11601
* Move translation prompt styling from inline CSS to CSS file
* Move “invited by” styling on registration form from inline to CSS file
* Use the progress tag to display poll results in JS fallback
* Fix poll results JS-less fallback when the user has voted for an option
* Change account public page “moved” notice to use img tags instead of inline CSS
* Move OTP hint inline CSS to SCSS file
* Hide JS-less fallback vote progressbars from accessibility tools
Co-authored-by: Eugen Rochko <eugen@zeonfederated.com>
This is achieved by sending a DELETE request to
/settings/profile/pictures/{avatar,header} via a link that is part of
the upload form's hint of the respective picture.
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
No real conflict, upstream updated a dependency which is
textually adjacent to a glitch-soc-specific dependency.
Updated it.
- `yarn.lock`:
No real conflict, upstream updated a dependency which is
textually adjacent to a glitch-soc-specific dependency.
Updated it.
* Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail
Fixes#6778
The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before
the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to
pick previous values if running too early.
Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however,
I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order:
- `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification.
In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so
if we use the former, we have the same issue.
- the `after_commit` hook is called
- `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions`
notification.
In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true,
so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not
going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after*
executing the after_commit hook).
This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or
`after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the
transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably
be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification.
The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks
whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately
send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook.
[1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification
[2]: 406915cb78/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb (L133-L194)
* Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model
* Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/poll_form.js`:
Upstream bumped poll option character limit, but we already had
a higher one, kept ours.
- `app/validators/poll_validator.rb`:
Upstream bumped poll option character limit, but we already had
a higher one, kept ours.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream added a rule, the way we compute ours is different, but
that added rule has been ported.
- `package.json`:
No real conflict, dependency update. Performed the same update.
- `yarn.lock`:
No real conflict, dependency update. Performed the same update.
This commit redesign the polls and increases characters limit for the
options from 25 to 50 characters, giving pollsters more freedom.
Summarizing, the redesign is making the polls more adaptive for upcoming
changes to the options characters limit: the bar, or a "chart", is now
displayed separately from the option itself; vote check mark is moved
next to the option text, making the percentages take less space. Option
lengths are taken into account and text is wrapped to multiple lines
if necessary to avoid overflow.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Our README.md files are completely different. Discarded upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/core/admin.js`:
Updating rails-ujs, no real conflict, but a comment to close to changed
code. Various glitch-soc-only files have been updated to match those changes,
though.
- `package.json`:
No real conflict, just an additional dependency in glitch-soc that was too
close to something updated upstream. Took upstream's changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/api/v1/statuses_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream adding a new parameter (with_rate_limit),
too close to glitch-soc's own additional parameter (content_type).
Added upstream's parameter.
- `app/services/post_status_service.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream adding a new parameter (rate_limit),
too close to glitch-soc's own additional parameter (content_type).
Added upstream's parameter.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Conflict due to us not exposing theme settings here (as we have
a different flavour/skin menu).
Took upstream change, while still not exposing theme settings.
- `config/webpack/shared.js`:
Coding style fixes for a part we have rewritten.
Discarded upstream changes.
If the “Why do you want to join?” textarea is left empty and the entered params
do not validate, the textarea isn't shown again, unlike other fields.
This commit fixes that by populating an empty `UserInviteRequest` when needed.
This adds "Show thread" button to the status view which is used in
profiles. The logic to display the button is mimicking logic in
web app available at app/javascript/mastodon/components/status.js#L439.
* The little change in components CSS required to remove enforced
underline for all links on public pages on our button.
Conflicts:
- `app/serializers/rest/account_serializer.rb`:
Upstream added code too close to glitch-soc-specific followers-hiding code.
Ported upstream changes.
* Return last_status_at as date, not datetime
* Fix relative timestamp for dates when delay is inferior to 1 day
* Also fix public directory
* Fix error when last_status_at isn't set
* Add announcements
Fix#11006
* Add reactions to announcements
* Add admin UI for announcements
* Add unit tests
* Fix issues
- Add `with_dismissed` param to announcements API
- Fix end date not being formatted when time range is given
- Fix announcement delete causing reactions to send streaming updates
- Fix announcements container growing too wide and mascot too small
- Fix `all_day` being settable when no time range is given
- Change text "Update" to "Announcement"
* Fix scheduler unpublishing announcements before they are due
* Fix filter params not being passed to announcements filter
Allow browsing and filtering all relationships instead of just
followers, unify the codebase with the user-facing relationship
manager, add ability to see who the user invited
Thibaut Girka