Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
We have completely different contents. Kept our version.
- `package.json`:
Not a real conflict, just an upstream dependency udpated
textually too close to a glitch-soc-only dependency.
Updated dependencies like upstream.
- `streaming/index.js`:
Conflict due to code style changes on parts that were
modified in glitch-soc to handle local-only toots.
Changed style according to upstream.
Up until now, we have used Devise's Rememberable mechanism to re-log users
after the end of their browser sessions. This mechanism relies on a signed
cookie containing a token. That token was stored on the user's record,
meaning it was shared across all logged in browsers, meaning truly revoking
a browser's ability to auto-log-in involves revoking the token itself, and
revoking access from *all* logged-in browsers.
We had a session mechanism that dynamically checks whether a user's session
has been disabled, and would log out the user if so. However, this would only
clear a session being actively used, and a new one could be respawned with
the `remember_user_token` cookie.
In practice, this caused two issues:
- sessions could be revived after being closed from /auth/edit (security issue)
- auto-log-in would be disabled for *all* browsers after logging out from one
of them
This PR removes the `remember_token` mechanism and treats the `_session_id`
cookie/token as a browser-specific `remember_token`, fixing both issues.
Conflicts:
- `app/helpers/accounts_helper.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/accounts/_header.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/directories/index.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Small markup change in glitch-soc, on a line that has been modified by
upstream. Ported upstream changes.
* Fix issues with POSIX::Spawn, Terrapin and Ruby 3.0
Also improve the Terrapin monkey-patch for the stderr/stdout issue.
* Fix keyword argument handling throughout the codebase
* Monkey-patch Paperclip to fix keyword arguments handling in validators
* Change validation_extensions to please CodeClimate
* Bump microformats from 4.2.1 to 4.3.1
* Allow Ruby 3.0
* Add Ruby 3.0 test target to CircleCI
* Add test for admin dashboard warnings
* Fix admin dashboard warnings on Ruby 3.0
Conflicts:
- `app/lib/feed_manager.rb`:
Not a real conflict, glitch-soc-only DM-related method
too close to changed upstream stuff.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/batched_remove_status_service.rb`:
Additional logic in glitch-soc to clear DMs from timelines.
Ported upstream changes and fixed the DM TL clearing logic.
- `app/workers/scheduler/feed_cleanup_scheduler.rb`:
Additional code in glitch-soc to clear DM timelines.
Ported upstream changes.
* Fix external user creation failing when invite request text is required
Also fixes tootctl-based user creation.
* Add test about invites when invite request text is otherwise required
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream removed RTL classes. Did the same.
- `config/settings.yml`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
* Add honeypot fields to limit non-specialized spam
Add two honeypot fields: a fake website input and a fake password confirmation
one. The label/placeholder/aria-label tells not to fill them, and they are
hidden in CSS, so legitimate users should not fall into these.
This should cut down on some non-Mastodon-specific spambots.
* Require a 3 seconds delay before submitting the registration form
* Fix tests
* Move registration form time check to model validation
* Give people a chance to clear the honeypot fields
* Refactor honeypot translation strings
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`:
Conflict caused because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Took upstream's new code and applied the theming system changes on top
of it.
- `app/controllers/concerns/two_factor_authentication_concern.rb`:
Conflict caused because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Took upstream's new code and applied the theming system changes on top
of it.
If someone tries logging in to an account and is prompted for a 2FA
code or sign-in token, even if the account's password or e-mail is
updated in the meantime, the session will show the prompt and allow
the login process to complete with a valid 2FA code or sign-in token
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Updated upstream, we deleted it to not be flooded by Depandabot.
Kept deleted.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Puma updated on both sides, went for the most recent version.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/mutes_controller.rb`:
Upstream updated the serializer to support timed mutes, while
glitch-soc added a custom API ages ago to get information that
is already available elsewhere.
Dropped the glitch-soc-specific API, went with upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/core/admin.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/models/mute.rb`:
🤷
- `app/models/user.rb`:
New user setting added upstream while we have glitch-soc-specific
user settings. Added upstream's user setting.
- `config/settings.yml`:
Upstream added a new user setting close to a user setting we had
changed the defaults for. Added the new upstream setting.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated “too close” to a glitch-soc-specific
dependency. No real conflict. Updated the dependency.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, upstream updated dependencies that were too close to
glitch-soc-only ones in the file.
- `app/controllers/oauth/authorized_applications_controller.rb`:
Upstream changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/base_controller.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/sessions_controller.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc not preventing moved accounts from logging
in.
Ported upstream changes while keeping the ability for moved accounts to log
in.
- `app/policies/status_policy.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/rest/account_serializer.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's ability to hide followers count.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/process_mentions_service.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `package.json`:
Not a real conflict, upstream updated dependencies that were too close to
glitch-soc-only ones in the file.
Conflicts:
- `config/webpack/shared.js`:
Upstream has changed how Tesseract.js gets included and dropped a dependency.
The conflict is caused by glitch-soc having different code due to its
theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/mastodon/version.rb`:
Upstream refactor/code style change in a place we replaced upstream's
repo URL with ours.
Ported upstram changes, keeping our repo URL.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dropped dependencies, one of which was textually too close to
a glitch-soc-specific dependency. Not a real conflict.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb`:
Upstream change too close to a glitch-soc change related to
instance-local toots. Merged upstream changes.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's handling of Direct Messages,
merged upstream changes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Not really a conflict, caused by glitch-soc-only dependencies
being textually too close to updated upstream dependencies.
Merged upstream changes.
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/activitypub/collections_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc having to take care of local-only
pinned toots in that controller.
Took upstream's changes and restored the local-only special
handling.
- `app/controllers/auth/sessions_controller.rb`:
Minor conflicts due to the theming system, applied upstream
changes, adapted the following two files for glitch-soc's
theming system:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/controllers/concerns/two_factor_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc having to handle local-only
toots specially. Applied upstream changes and restored
the local-only special handling.
- `app/views/admin/custom_emojis/index.html.haml`:
Minor conflict due to the theming system.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
No real conflict, upstream updated a dependency which is
textually adjacent to a glitch-soc-specific dependency.
Updated it.
- `yarn.lock`:
No real conflict, upstream updated a dependency which is
textually adjacent to a glitch-soc-specific dependency.
Updated it.
* Fix “Email changed” notification sometimes having wrong e-mail
Fixes#6778
The root of the issue is that `send_devise_notification` was called before
the changes were properly commited to the database, causing the mailer to
pick previous values if running too early.
Devise's documentation provides guidance on how to handle that[1][2], however,
I have found it to not be working, as the following happens, in that order:
- `send_devise_notification` is called for the `email_changed` notification.
In that case, `changed?` is false and `saved_changes?` is true, so
if we use the former, we have the same issue.
- the `after_commit` hook is called
- `send_devise_notification` is called for the `confirmation_instructions`
notification.
In that case, `changed?` is still false, and `saved_changes?` still true,
so if we use the latter, that second notification email is simply not
going to be sent (as we would be queuing the notification *after*
executing the after_commit hook).
This is because it may be called from either an `after_update` or
`after_commit` hook, the difference not being a call to `save` but the
transaction actually being committed to the database. This may arguably
be a bug in Devise, or Devise's notification.
The proposed workaround is inspired by Devise's documentation but checks
whether a transaction is open to make the call whether to immediately
send the notification or defer it to the `after_commit` hook.
[1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/plataformatec/devise/Devise%2FModels%2FAuthenticatable:send_devise_notification
[2]: 406915cb78/lib/devise/models/authenticatable.rb (L133-L194)
* Fix cases when sending notifications without changing the model
* Defer sending if and only if in transaction including current record
While making browser requests in the other sessions after a password
change or reset does not allow you to be logged in and correctly
invalidates the session making the request, sessions have API tokens
associated with them, which can still be used until that session
is invalidated.
This is a security issue for accounts that were already compromised
some other way because it makes it harder to throw out the hijacker.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Upstream removed an unused function in code that has
been refactored a bit. Removed that function in the corresponding
places.
This might be somewhat controversial, but putting a redirection up
makes the account unusable, which works against use cases such as
using the moved account as backup in case the new one temporarily fails
(sure, the redirection can be temporarily removed, but it is a hassle)
Conflicts:
- README.md
- app/helpers/statuses_helper.rb
Upstream moved account helpers to their own file, we had extra
helpers there, moved too.
- app/lib/sanitize_config.rb
- app/models/user.rb
- app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb
- config/locales/simple_form.en.yml
- spec/lib/sanitize_config_spec.rb
Claire