Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Conflict because part of that file has been split to
`app/javascript/core/settings.js`. Ported those changes
there.
Conflicts:
- `.env.production.sample`:
Upstream deleted it, I decided to keep it.
- `package.json`:
Upstream updated a dependency textually too close to wavesurfer.js
which has been deleted from upstream but is kept in glitch-soc for now.
- Change audio files to not be stripped of metadata
- Automatically extract cover art from audio if it exists
- Add `thumbnail` parameter to `POST /api/v1/media`, `POST /api/v2/media` and `PUT /api/v1/media/:id`
- Add `icon` to represent it in attachments in ActivityPub
- Fix `preview_url` containing URL of missing missing image when there is no thumbnail instead of null
- Fix duration of audio not being displayed on public pages until the file is loaded
Change the behaviour of remotable concern. Previously, it would skip
downloading an attachment if the stored remote URL is identical to
the new one. Now it would not be skipped if the attachment is not
actually currently stored by Paperclip.
* Record account suspend/silence time and keep track of domain blocks
* Also unblock users who were suspended/silenced before dates were recorded
* Add tests
* Keep track of suspending date for users suspended through the CLI
* Show accurate number of accounts that would be affected by unsuspending an instance
* Change migration to set silenced_at and suspended_at
* Revert "Also unblock users who were suspended/silenced before dates were recorded"
This reverts commit a015c65d2d1e28c7b7cfab8b3f8cd5fb48b8b71c.
* Switch from using suspended and silenced to suspended_at and silenced_at
* Add post-deployment migration script to remove `suspended` and `silenced` columns
* Use Account#silence! and Account#suspend! instead of updating the underlying property
* Add silenced_at and suspended_at migration to post-migration
* Change account fabricator to translate suspended and silenced attributes
* Minor fixes
* Make unblocking domains always retroactive
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/oauth/authorized_applications_controller.rb
Two changes too close to each other
- app/controllers/settings/sessions_controller.rb
- app/lib/user_settings_decorator.rb
Two changes too close to each other
- app/models/media_attachment.rb
New changes too close to glitch-soc only changes.
- app/models/user.rb
Two changes too close to each other.
- app/services/remove_status_service.rb
Kept direct timeline code which had been removed upstream.
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Two changes too close to each other.
- config/locales/en.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “flavour”
- config/locales/ja.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “flavour”
- config/locales/pl.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “flavour”
- config/locales/simple_form.en.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “skin”
- config/locales/simple_form.pl.yml
Introduction of a new string too close to glitch-soc-only's “skin”
- config/settings.yml
Reverted upstream's decision of enabling posting application by default.
This also limits the statuses returned by API, but pagination is not
implemented in Web API yet. I still expect it brings user experience
better than making a user wait to fetch all ancestor statuses and flooding
the column with them.
to_s method of HTTP::Response keeps blocking while it receives the whole
content, no matter how it is big. This means it may waste time to receive
unacceptably large files. It may also consume memory and disk in the
process. This solves the inefficency by checking response length while
receiving.
* Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users
This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide
future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show
future reblogs instead).
This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's
timeline; it only affects new statuses.
The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow
endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be
respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if
the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is
sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply
update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification
muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or
false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship
information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an
object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may
need to be made in pickier languages.
Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true,
non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because
these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to
perform this change without locking those tables, although the
tables are likely to be small anyway.
Tests included.
See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>.
* Rubocop fixes
* Code review changes
* Test fixes
This patchset closes#648 and resolves#3271.
* Rubocop fix
* Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests
It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting:
if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing
any value), we need to detect and handle it.
We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but
there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
* Add a hide_notifications column to mutes
* Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute!
* block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts
* Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications?
* specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications
* Add support for muting notifications in MuteService
* API support for muting notifications (and specs)
* Less gross passing of notifications flag
* Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox.
* Convert profile header mute to use mute modal
* Satisfy eslint.
* specs for MuteService notifications params
* add trailing newlines to files for Pork :)
* Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element.
* Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes.
* Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details
* Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint
* Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint
* Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists
* Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint
* make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work
* satisfy eslint
* In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal.
* fix a missing import
* add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions
* Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner
* minor code style fixes oops
* Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint
* Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons
* Fix code style issues
* Remove superfluous blank line
* Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes
* Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer
Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account.
* Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes
* Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal.
* Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better
* Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space
* Code review suggestions from akihikodaki
Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions.
* Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent
It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the
number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any
blocking migrations nonetheless.
* Fix up migration things
* Remove /api/v2/mutes
Note that this will only hide/show *future* reblogs by a user, and does
nothing to remove/add reblogs that are already in the timeline. I don't
think that's a particularly confusing behavior, and it's a lot easier
to implement (similar to mutes, I believe).
* Add a StatusFilter class to identify visibility of statuses by accounts
* Extract StatusThreadingConcern from Status
* Clarify purpose of checking for nil account
* Move specs for account finder methods to concern spec
* Move account finder methods to concern
* Improve spec wording
* Use more explicit comparison to ensure correct return value
* Add coverage for .find_local! and .find_remote!
* Add some methods to the finder
* Use arel on matching_username method
* Avoid ternary in matching domain method
* Simplify finder methods
* Use an AccountFinder class to simplify lookup
Thibaut Girka
