* Eliminate extra accounts select query from FollowService
* Optimistically update follow state in web UI and hide loading bar
Fix#6205
* Asynchronize NotifyService in FollowService
And fix failing test
* Skip Webfinger resolve routine when called from FollowService if possible
If an account is ActivityPub, then webfinger re-resolving is not necessary
when called from FollowService. Improve options of ResolveAccountService
* Nascent tag menu on frontend
* Hook up frontend to search
* Tag intersection backend first pass
* Update yarnlock
* WIP
* Fix for tags not searching correctly
* Make radio buttons function
* Simplify radio buttons with modeOption
* Better naming
* Rearrange options
* Add all/any/none functionality on backend
* Small PR cleanup
* Move to service from scope
* Small cleanup, add proper service tests
* Don't use send with user input :D
* Set appropriate column header
* Handle auto updating timeline
* Fix up toggle function
* Use tag value correctly
* A bit more correct to use 'self' rather than 'all' in status scope
* Fix some style issues
* Fix more code style issues
* Style select dropdown more better
* Only use to_id'ed value to ensure no SQL injection
* Revamp frontend to allow for multiple selects
* Update backend / col header to account for more flexible tagging
* Update brakeman ignore
* Codeclimate suggestions
* Fix presenter tag_url
* Implement initial PR feedback
* Handle additional tag streaming
* CodeClimate tweak
* Add profile to json+ld in Accept
It's required by the ActivityPub spec
* Use headers['Content-type'] instead of mime_type
mime_type strips the profile from the content type, but it's still available raw in the headers hash
* Add test for ld+json with profile
* Do not hide boost notifications from followed people with hidden boosts
Not displaying boosts from a followed user in the Home timeline and not
having notifications when they reblog your own content are two very
separate concerns, tying them together seem counter-intuitive and unwanted.
* Update specs accordingly
* Add locality check to ActivityPub::FetchRemoteAccountService
Fix#8643
Because there are a few places where it is called, it is difficult
to confirm if they all previously checked it for locality. It's better
to make sure within the service.
* Remove faux-remote duplicates of local accounts
* Add silent column to mentions
* Save silent mentions in ActivityPub Create handler and optimize it
Move networking calls out of the database transaction
* Add "limited" visibility level masked as "private" in the API
Unlike DMs, limited statuses are pushed into home feeds. The access
control rules between direct and limited statuses is almost the same,
except for counter and conversation logic
* Ensure silent column is non-null, add spec
* Ensure filters don't check silent mentions for blocks/mutes
As those are "this person is also allowed to see" rather than "this
person is involved", therefore does not warrant filtering
* Clean up code
* Use Status#active_mentions to limit returned mentions
* Fix code style issues
* Use Status#active_mentions in Notification
And remove stream_entry eager-loading from Notification
* Add conversations API
* Add web UI for conversations
* Add test for conversations API
* Add tests for ConversationAccount
* Improve web UI
* Rename ConversationAccount to AccountConversation
* Remove conversations on block and mute
* Change last_status_id to be a denormalization of status_ids
* Add optimistic locking
UX-wise, people expect that saving the profile will re-check links even without changing fields content. Bug-wise, `@account` was undefined.
Regression from #8703
* Verify link ownership with rel="me"
* Add explanation about verification to UI
* Perform link verifications
* Add click-to-copy widget for verification HTML
* Redesign edit profile page
* Redesign forms
* Improve responsive design of settings pages
* Restore landing page sign-up form
* Fix typo
* Support <link> tags, add spec
* Fix links not being verified on first discovery and passive updates
* If an Update is signed with known key, skip re-following procedure
Because it means the remote actor did *not* lose their database
* Add CLI method for rotating keys
bin/tootctl accounts rotate [USERNAME]
Generates a new RSA key per account and sends out an Update activity
signed with the old key.
* Key rotation: Space out Update fan-outs every 5 minutes per 1000 accounts
* Skip suspended accounts in key rotation
* Allow accessing local private/DM messages by URL
(Provided the user pasting the URL is authorized to see the toot, obviously)
* Fix SearchServiceSpec tests
* Re-add follow recommendations API
GET /api/v1/suggestions
Removed in 30f9e9e624 due to Neo4J
dependency. The algorithm uses triadic closures, takes into account
suspensions, blocks, mutes, domain blocks, excludes locked and moved
accounts, and prefers more recently updated accounts.
* Track interactions with people you don't follow
Replying to, favouriting and reblogging someone you're not following
will make them show up in follow recommendations. The interactions
have different weights:
- Replying is 1
- Favouriting is 10 (decidedly positive interaction, but private)
- Reblogging is 20
Following them, muting or blocking will remove them from the list,
obviously.
* Remove triadic closures, ensure potential friendships are trimmed
Ref: 0c2a08adeb
This breaks compatibility with pre-2.3.0 Mastodon and older
software, but at the time of writing the network is >80% above
that version.
Compatibility broken only for toots with no text.
* Send rejections to followers when user hides domain they're on
* Use account domain blocks for "authorized followers" action
Replace soft-blocking (block & unblock) behaviour with follow rejection
* Split sync and async work of account domain blocking
Do not create domain block when removing followers by domain, that
is probably unexpected from the user's perspective.
* Adjust confirmation message for domain block
* yarn manage:translations
Old statuses and statuses from Pawoo, which runs a modified version of
Mastodon, may not have been marked sensitive even if spoiler text is
present.
Such statuses are still not marked sensitve if they are local or
arrived before version upgrade. Marking recently fetched remote status
sensitive contradicts the behavior.
Considering what people expected when they authored such statuses, this
change removes the sensitivity enforcement.
Eugen Rochko