Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/styles/mastodon/forms.scss`:
Conflict because we ran eslint autofix on upstream files.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Code style changes but we have a different version.
Kept our version.
- `streaming/index.js`:
Upstream fixed a typo close to glitch-soc-only code.
Applied upstream's changes.
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
Upstream removed a dependency that was textually close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency.
Removed the dependency as upstream did, while keeping the glitch-soc-only
dependency.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream switched to pushing to both DockerHub and GitHub Container
Repository, while glitch-soc was already pushing to the latter only.
Updated our configuration to be slightly more consistent with upstream's
naming and styling, but kept our behavior.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Updated dependencies textually too close to glitch-soc only hcaptcha
dependency.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our README, though it probably should be reworked at some point.
- `app/views/auth/sessions/two_factor.html.haml`:
Minor style fix upstream that's on a line glitch-soc removed because
of its different theming system.
Kept our file as is.
- `spec/controllers/health_controller_spec.rb`:
This file apparently did not exist upstream, upstream created it with
different contents but it is functionally the same.
Switched to upstream's version of the file.
- `spec/presenters/instance_presenter_spec.rb`:
Upstream changed the specs around `GITHUB_REPOSITORY`, while glitch-soc
had its own code because it's a fork and does not have the same default
source URL.
Took upstream's change, but with glitch-soc's repo as the default case.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependencies textually too close to a glitch-soc only one.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream added a line at the end of the file, while glitch-soc had its own
extra lines.
Took upstream's change.
- `CONTRIBUTING.md`:
We have our custom CONTRIBUTING.md quoting upstream. Upstream made changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/application_controller.rb`:
Upstream made code style changes in a method that is entirely replaced
in glitch-soc.
Ignored the change.
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Code style changes textually close to glitch-soc-specific changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Ignored them.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, upstream updated dependencies that were too close to
glitch-soc-only ones in the file.
- `app/controllers/oauth/authorized_applications_controller.rb`:
Upstream changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/base_controller.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/settings/sessions_controller.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc not preventing moved accounts from logging
in.
Ported upstream changes while keeping the ability for moved accounts to log
in.
- `app/policies/status_policy.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/rest/account_serializer.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's ability to hide followers count.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/process_mentions_service.rb`:
Upstream refactored and changed the logic surrounding suspended accounts.
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `package.json`:
Not a real conflict, upstream updated dependencies that were too close to
glitch-soc-only ones in the file.
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
Allow access to account settings, 2FA, authorized applications, and
account deletions to unconfirmed and pending users, as well as
users who had their accounts disabled. Suspended users cannot update
their e-mail or password or delete their account.
Display account status on account settings page, for example, when
an account is frozen, limited, unconfirmed or pending review.
After sign up, login users straight away and show a simple page that
tells them the status of their account with links to account settings
and logout, to reduce onboarding friction and allow users to correct
wrongly typed e-mail addresses.
Move the final sign-up step of SSO integrations to be the same
as above to reduce code duplication.
Define `Settings::BaseController#set_body_classes` so that sub classes
inherit `Settings::BaseController` don't need to define
`#set_body_classes` agein.
* Add spec coverage for settings/two_factor_auth area
* extract setup method for qr code
* Move otp required check to before action
* Merge method only used once
* Remove duplicate view
* Consolidate creation of @codes for backup
* Move settings/2fq#recovery_codes to settings/recovery_codes#create
* Rename settings/two_factor_auth#disable to #destroy
* Add coverage for the otp required path on 2fa#show
* Clean up the recovery codes list styles
* Move settings/two_factor_auth to settings/two_factor_authentication
* Reorganize the settings two factor auth area
Updated to use a flow like:
- settings/two_factor_authentication goes to a #show view which has a button
either enable or disable 2fa on the account
- the disable button turns off the otp requirement for the user
- the enable button cycles the user secret and redirects to a confirmation page
- the confirmation page is a #new view which shows the QR code for user
- that page posts to #create which verifies the code, and creates the recovery
codes
- that create action shares a view with a recovery codes controller which can be
used separately to reset codes if needed
Claire