Found via `codespell -q 3 -S ./yarn.lock,./CHANGELOG.md,./AUTHORS.md,./config/locales,./app/javascript/mastodon/locales -L ba,followings,keypair,medias,pattens,pixelx,rememberable,ro,te`
* Change unapproved and unconfirmed account to not be accessible in the REST API
* Change Account#searchable? to reject unconfirmed and unapproved users
* Disable search for unapproved and unconfirmed users in Account.search_for
* Disable search for unapproved and unconfirmed users in Account.advanced_search_for
* Remove unconfirmed and unapproved accounts from Account.searchable scope
* Prevent mentions to unapproved/unconfirmed accounts
* Fix some old tests for Account.advanced_search_for
* Add some Account.advanced_search_for tests for existing behaviors
* Add some tests for Account.search_for
* Add Account.advanced_search_for tests unconfirmed and unapproved accounts
* Add Account.searchable tests
* Fix Account.without_unapproved scope potentially messing with previously-applied scopes
* Allow lookup of unconfirmed/unapproved accounts through /api/v1/accounts/lookup
This is so that the API can still be used to check whether an username is free
to use.
* Change account and user fabricators to simplify and improve tests
- `Fabricate(:account)` implicitly fabricates an associated `user` if
no `domain` attribute is given (an account with `domain: nil` is
considered a local account, but no user record was created), unless
`user: nil` is passed
- `Fabricate(:account, user: Fabricate(:user))` should still be possible
but is discouraged.
* Fix and refactor tests
- avoid passing unneeded attributes to `Fabricate(:user)` or
`Fabricate(:account)`
- avoid embedding `Fabricate(:user)` into a `Fabricate(:account)` or the other
way around
- prefer `Fabricate(:user, account_attributes: …)` to
`Fabricate(:user, account: Fabricate(:account, …)`
- also, some tests were using remote accounts with local user records, which is
not representative of production code.
* Fix error when suspending user with an already-existing canonical email block
Fixes#17033
While attempting to create a `CanonicalEmailBlock` with an existing hash would
raise an `ActiveRecord::RecordNotUnique` error, this being done within a
transaction would cancel the whole transaction. For this reason, checking for
uniqueness in Rails would query the database within the transaction and avoid
invalidating the whole transaction for this reason.
A race condition is still possible, where multiple accounts sharing a canonical
email would be blocked in concurrent transactions, in which only one would
succeed, but that is way less likely to happen that the current issue, and can
always be retried after the first failure, unlike the current situation.
* Add tests
Change the behaviour of remotable concern. Previously, it would skip
downloading an attachment if the stored remote URL is identical to
the new one. Now it would not be skipped if the attachment is not
actually currently stored by Paperclip.
* Check to make sure usernames with '.' cannot be created
* Add test for instance actor account name conflicts
This makes sure that migration 20190715164535_add_instance_actor
won't fail if there's already an account that is named the same
as the domain (minus the .)
* Put the test into the correct context...
* Add another test to split this into two validations
* Don't delete periods when validating username uniqueness (#11392)
The 20190715164535_add_instance_actor migration fails if there's
already a username similar to the domain name, e.g. if you are
'vulpine.club' and have a user named 'vulpineclub', validation
fails.
Upon further review, usernames with periods are dropped by the
regular expression in the Account class, so we don't need to
worry about it here.
Fixes#11392
* Add support for an instance actor
* Skip username validation for local Application accounts
* Add migration script to create instance actor
* Make Codeclimate happy
* Switch to id -99 for instance actor
* Remove unused `icon` and `image` attributes from instance actor
* Use if/elsif/else instead of return + ternary operator
* Add instance actor to fresh installs
* Use instance actor as instance representative
Use instance actor for forwarding reports, relay operations, and spam
auto-reporting.
* Seed database in test environment
* Fix single-user mode
* Fix tests
* Fix specs to accomodate for an extra `Account`
* Auto-reject follows on instance actor
Following an instance actor might make sense, but we are not handling that
right now, so auto-reject.
* Fix webfinger lookup and serialization for instance actor
* Rename instance actor
* Make it clear in the HTML view that the instance actor should not be blocked
* Raise cache time for instance actor as there's no dynamic content
* Re-use /about/more with a flash message for instance actor profile
* Change domain blocks to automatically support subdomains
If a more authoritative domain is blocked (example.com), then the
same block will be applied to a subdomain (foo.example.com)
* Match subdomains of existing accounts when blocking/unblocking domains
* Improve code style
* Change note_length validator from 160 to 500
* Change input maxlength from 160 to 500
* update bio test from 160 to 500
* Multiply a string 30 times instead of 10
* Squish username before validation (#10101)
Fix#10101
* Move before_validation hook to a private method
Also add Unicode wite-spaces to the spec to support the use of squish
over strip.
Fixes#9309
This only allows hyphens in the middle of a username, much like dots,
although I don't have a compelling reason to do so other than keeping
the changes minimal.
Initially I thought there might be valid reasons for remote users to
have a different, unpredicted username format. However, I now realize
such a difference would be unusable and unexpected within Mastodon.
Fix#8058
* Re-add follow recommendations API
GET /api/v1/suggestions
Removed in 30f9e9e624 due to Neo4J
dependency. The algorithm uses triadic closures, takes into account
suspensions, blocks, mutes, domain blocks, excludes locked and moved
accounts, and prefers more recently updated accounts.
* Track interactions with people you don't follow
Replying to, favouriting and reblogging someone you're not following
will make them show up in follow recommendations. The interactions
have different weights:
- Replying is 1
- Favouriting is 10 (decidedly positive interaction, but private)
- Reblogging is 20
Following them, muting or blocking will remove them from the list,
obviously.
* Remove triadic closures, ensure potential friendships are trimmed
Do not touch statuses_count on accounts table when mass-destroying
statuses to reduce load when removing accounts, same for
reblogs_count and favourites_count
Do not count statuses with direct visibility in statuses_count
Fix#828
Claire