74 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
74 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "Cleaning up fortune and friends"
|
|
date: 2022-11-20T22:22:22+11:00
|
|
draft: true
|
|
showSummary: true
|
|
summary: "As it turns out, fortune-mod has an -o option for \"offensive\" fortunes, which range from vaguely off-colour
|
|
to wildly homophobic and outright racist. We figured someone should clean up and reorganise the program to get rid
|
|
of anything vile, and replace the offensive category with an NSFW category."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Background
|
|
|
|
> **(Selene)** Hi there. Unlike most of the blogs on here, I'll be narrating this one. This topic is closer to my heart,
|
|
> and requires less technical expertise than most of the others. I'll still defer to Ashe for any code changes, though.
|
|
> The gods know I can't grok C to save my life.
|
|
|
|
The [original fortune package](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_(Unix)) was written in 1979, a good 43 years ago.
|
|
Obviously, times have changed since than, and the package itself has gone through several revisions and re-writes.
|
|
Fortunes have also been added, removed, and moved around.
|
|
|
|
There currently exist two maintained distributions. The [original BSD version](https://github.com/ahills/fortune),
|
|
repackaged to run on Alpine Linux, and [fortune-mod](https://github.com/shlomif/fortune-mod), which is a re-write in C.
|
|
|
|
## Why is this a problem?
|
|
|
|
Three Reasons:
|
|
|
|
1. A lot of the "offensive" fortunes are simply insensitive, mocking, or degrading by today's standards.
|
|
Even were they not, it sets a bad example to have a fortunes package that spits out slurs or homophobia[^1]
|
|
at people by default, even if it *is* gated behind a flag. If people truly want these fortunes, they should
|
|
be contained in their own package that distros can opt and out of as they please,
|
|
instead of everything being clubbed together.
|
|
2. Sensibilities have changed since the 1970s, and while some fortunes have been removed, a lot of the fortunes in these
|
|
packages would get you a stern talking-to if your manager saw it. These should live in an NSFW category.
|
|
While this overlaps with an "offensive" category, it is not the same thing.
|
|
3. As fortunes have been written, added, modified, and removed, the categories have gotten blurry and indistinct. The
|
|
fortunes themselves need a re-organisation and trim.
|
|
|
|
[^1]: Or Hitler quotes, for that matter.
|
|
|
|
## How do we fix this?
|
|
|
|
There's a number of problems here, but fundamentally, they are all organisational problems. As such, our first task is to tag each fortune as NSFW, a candidate for removal, or inaccurate in its category.
|
|
|
|
From there we can restructure the packages and propose these changes upstream.
|
|
|
|
## Where do we start?
|
|
|
|
We'll start with BSD's `fortune` package, as used in Alpine, for two reasons. For one, it is smaller than `fortunes-mod`. For two, the Alpine Linux maintainers tend to be relatively sensible, so this will be a good proving ground.
|
|
|
|
## Let's get to it
|
|
|
|
We started by mirroring the [fortune](https://github.com/ahills/fortune) package used on Alpine.
|
|
|
|
### First steps
|
|
|
|
The very first thing we'll do is move the default branch from `master` to `main`. This is a very small thing, but if we should be thorough if we're going to do this.
|
|
|
|
### Scanning through the fortunes
|
|
In the BSD/Alpine version, the fortunes are located in the `datfiles` directory, and the files we care about are:
|
|
- fortunes-o
|
|
- fortunes2-o
|
|
- limerick
|
|
|
|
These are noted as having the "offensive" fortunes, however we'll also give the non-offensive fortunes a scan. Since the fortunes in this version aren't categorised, we'll leave them uncategorised for now. Maybe a project for later.
|
|
|
|
> **(Doll)** Doll will remind Miss Selene about this another time!
|
|
>
|
|
> **(Selene)** Thanks Doll.
|
|
|
|
We've created a [full breakdown]({{< ref "lists/fortunes-cleanup" >}}) of each fortune that was removed, moved, or altered, and *why*, if you're interested. Content Notices for that page are **everything**. This is not a joke. I try to provide a summary near the top of the kinds
|
|
of content present, but it is not exhaustive, and fortunes are not individually marked and spoilered.
|
|
|
|
By the by, huge thanks to the Treehouse Systems community for helping us out with screening these. |