When the file starts with one or more blank lines, the first paragraph
doesn't start on line 1.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56117.
Bug existed since version 4.0, commit ac8bd2a2.
The word "buffer" in relation to undo has been confusing to translators.
Also, drop the exclamation mark, as there is nothing important or urgent
about these messages.
Because somehow something goes wrong when SIGWINCHes are handled while
reading from a pipe.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56011.
Bug existed since version 2.4.2, commit 75d64e67.
Some commands can take a little while to execute; showing just the prompt
during that time could give the impression that nothing is happening.
This addresses https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56041.
When nano was configured with --enable-tiny --enable-speller, the
block_sigwinch() function should be available, to mask SIGWINCHes
during a spell check.
The blocking is needed only during the wait(), so unblock SIGWINCH
again right after the wait() -- also to have the unblocking before
a possible error exit.
Somehow a SIGWINCH pushes nano past the wait() in do_alt_speller(),
even though the external spelling program hasn't finished.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56010
by reverting commit 1f39f60b.
Bug existed since version 3.2.
Since commit 4c6ec637 from about half a year ago, the 'action' parameter
of update_undo() is unused. Verify that this parameter matches the type
of the item at the top of the undo stack, so that in another half year
the parameter can be safely removed.
When the mark is off, initialize not just 'bot_x' but also 'top_x'.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55898.
Bug existed since the justifying of a marked region was introduced,
four days ago, with commit f7f5514e.
This matches Pico's behavior. However, Pico doesn't add the quoting +
indentation to the line in which the selection ends, but this is wrong,
so nano does add it. Also, Pico doesn't account for partial quoting +
indentation at the start or end of a selection, but this is wrong, so
nano does.
Unlike a regular paragraph, marked text may have different quotes and
more than two types of indentation. Handle this by replacing deviant
quotes with the quote of the first line, and deviant indentation with
the indentation of the second line.
This is modelled after Pico's behavior. However, Pico won't do anything
if you do a full-justify while the mark is on. But this is unnecessarily
limiting, so, when the mark is on, nano will handle a full-justify and a
plain justify the same.
This currently does not handle the lead (quoting + indentation) in
justified selections, does not put mid-line justified selections onto
separate lines, and does not strip whitespace after the lead in justified
selections, the latter two of which Pico does. These behaviors are
forthcoming.
concat_paragraph() concatenates a paragraph into a single line, and
rewrap_paragraph() rewraps that line into multiple lines again.
These two will be needed when the justifying of marked text is added.
Instead of passing 'quote_len' to these functions, calculate it directly
in them.
This will be needed when the justifying of marked text is added. When
unmarked text is justified, it is a single paragraph and by definition
has a uniform quoting part. But marked text may be a jumble of lines
that have different quoting parts.
Benno Schulenberg