lbmk/config/coreboot/e6420_10mb/target.cfg

tree="default"
xarch="i386-elf"
payload_grub="n"
payload_grub_withseabios="n"
payload_seabios="y"
payload_memtest="y"
payload_seabios_withgrub="y"
payload_seabios_grubonly="y"
grub_scan_disk="ahci"
status="unstable"
config: Add Dell Latitude E6420 Tested by Martin Dawson. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com> 2024-01-26 17:54:29 +00:00			`tree="default"`
fix target.cfg files on dell latitudes some latitudes still used the old style for variables in target.cfg, specifically arch="x86_64" - lbmk used to then check that on a big if/else and translate it to the correct target name for crossgcc, e.g. i386-elf, arm-eabi now it just puts the arch directly, in a new variable: xarch change arch="x86_64" to xarch="i386-elf" in these files. also remove a few obsolete variables. should build now. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org> 2024-04-28 02:27:54 +00:00			`xarch="i386-elf"`
config: Add Dell Latitude E6420 Tested by Martin Dawson. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com> 2024-01-26 17:54:29 +00:00			`payload_grub="n"`
			`payload_grub_withseabios="n"`
			`payload_seabios="y"`
			`payload_memtest="y"`
			`payload_seabios_withgrub="y"`
			`payload_seabios_grubonly="y"`
			`grub_scan_disk="ahci"`
correct dell latitude status for release it should be marked unstable, though these machines are basically reliable; they have certain missing features and quirky behaviour so it's important not to over-sell it mark it as unstable, on all of the dell latitudes Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org> 2024-05-01 05:29:09 +00:00			`status="unstable"`