lbmk/resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper

727 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# helper script: create ROM images for a given mainboard
#
# Copyright (C) 2020,2021,2023 Leah Rowe <info@minifree.org>
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
# Copyright (C) 2021 Ferass El Hafidi <vitali64pmemail@protonmail.com>
# Copyright (C) 2022 Caleb La Grange <thonkpeasant@protonmail.com>
# Copyright (C) 2022 Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak@gmail.com>
#
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
#
# This script assumes that the working directory is the root
# of git or release archive
[ "x${DEBUG+set}" = 'xset' ] && set -v
set -u -e
projectname="$(cat projectname)"
cbcfgdir="resources/coreboot"
boardcfgdir=""
kmapdir="resources/grub/keymap"
displaymodes=""
payloads=""
keyboard_layouts=""
board=""
2021-11-27 19:06:32 +00:00
grub_scan_disk="undefined"
cbtree="undefined"
romtype="normal" # optional parameter in board.cfg. "normal" is default
arch="undefined"
# Disable all payloads by default.
# board.cfg files have to specifically enable [a] payload(s)
payload_grub="n"
payload_grub_withseabios="n" # seabios chainloaded from grub
payload_seabios="n"
payload_seabios_withgrub="n" # i386-coreboot grub from SeaBIOS boot menu
payload_memtest="n"
payload_uboot="n"
uboot_config="undefined"
romdir=""
cbdir=""
cbfstool=""
corebootrom=""
seavgabiosrom=""
CROSS_COMPILE=""
main()
{
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
while [[ $# > 0 ]]; do
case ${1} in
-d)
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
displaymodes+="${2}"
shift ;;
-p)
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
payloads+="${2}"
shift ;;
-k)
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
keyboard_layouts+="${2}"
shift ;;
*)
board=${1} ;;
esac
shift
done
printf "board %s , kb %s , displaymode %s , payloads %s\n" \
${board} ${keyboard_layouts} ${displaymodes} \
${payloads}
if [ "${board}" = "" ]; then
printf "build/roms: undefined board. Exiting\n"
exit 1
fi
load_config
build_dependencies
build_rom_images
}
load_config()
{
boardcfgdir="${cbcfgdir}/${board}"
if [ ! -d "${boardcfgdir}" ]; then
printf "build/roms: Target not defined: %s\n" ${board}
exit 1
fi
if [ ! -f "${boardcfgdir}/board.cfg" ]; then
printf "build/roms %s: Missing board.cfg\n" ${board}
exit 1
fi
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
source "${boardcfgdir}/board.cfg"
if [ "${board}" != "${cbtree}" ]; then
cbdir="coreboot/${cbtree}"
else
cbdir="coreboot/${board}"
fi
romdir="bin/${board}"
cbfstool="${cbdir}/util/cbfstool/cbfstool"
seavgabiosrom="payload/seabios/seavgabios.bin"
corebootrom="${cbdir}/build/coreboot.rom"
if [ "${grub_scan_disk}" = "undefined" ]; then
printf "build/roms '%s': grub_scan_disk is undefined. " \
${board}
printf "Defaulting to 'both'.\n"
grub_scan_disk="both"
fi
if [ "${grub_scan_disk}" != "both" ] && \
[ "${grub_scan_disk}" != "ata" ] && \
[ "${grub_scan_disk}" != "ahci" ]; then
printf "build/roms '%s': invalid grub_scan_disk config. " \
${board}
printf "Defaulting to 'both'.\n"
grub_scan_disk="both"
# erroring out would be silly. just use the default
fi
if [ "${cbtree}" = "undefined" ]; then
printf "build/roms '%s': undefined coreboot tree. " \
${board}
printf "Skipping build.\n"
exit 1
fi
if [ "${arch}" = "undefined" ]; then
printf "build/roms '%s': undefined CPU type. " \
${board}
printf "Skipping build.\n"
exit 1
fi
if [ "${payload_memtest}" != "n" ] && \
[ "${payload_memtest}" != "y" ]; then
payload_memtest="n"
fi
if [ "${payload_grub_withseabios}" = "y" ]; then
payload_grub="y"
fi
if [ "${payload_grub_withseabios}" = "y" ]; then
payload_seabios="y"
payload_seabios_withgrub="y"
fi
if [ "${payload_seabios_withgrub}" = "y" ]; then
payload_seabios="y"
fi
if [ "${payload_uboot}" != "n" ] && \
[ "${payload_uboot}" != "y" ]; then
payload_uboot="n"
fi
if [ "${payload_uboot}" = "y" ] && \
[ "${uboot_config}" = "undefined" ]; then
uboot_config="default"
fi
load_config_overrides
die_if_cbconfig_and_nopayload
}
load_config_overrides()
{
# Override all payload directives with cmdline args
if [ -z ${payloads} ]; then
return 0
fi
echo "setting payloads $payloads"
payload_grub="n"
payload_grub_withseabios="n" # seabios chainloaded from grub
payload_seabios="n"
payload_seabios_withgrub="n" # grub from SeaBIOS menu
payload_uboot="n"
payload_memtest="n"
for payload in ${payloads} ; do
eval "payload_${payload}=y"
done
}
die_if_cbconfig_and_nopayload()
{
# if a coreboot config exists, and payloads are not
# defined in the lbmk config, exit with error
# if no configs exist, this won't fail. this way, cbtrees
# like "default" can exist which just contain patches
if [ "${payload_grub}" = "y" ] || [ "${payload_seabios}" = "y" ] \
|| [ "${payload_uboot}" = "y" ]; then
return 0
fi
for configfile in "${boardcfgdir}/config/"*; do
if [ ! -e "${configfile}" ]; then
continue
fi
printf "build/roms %s: Payload undefined. Exiting.\n" \
${board}
exit 1
done
}
build_dependencies()
{
if [ ! -d "${cbdir}" ]; then
./download coreboot ${cbtree}
fi
if [ ! -f "${cbfstool}" ]; then
./build module cbutils ${cbtree} || exit 1
fi
cat version > "${cbdir}/.coreboot-version"
build_dependency_crossgcc
build_dependency_seabios
build_dependency_grub
build_dependency_uboot
}
build_dependency_crossgcc()
{
if [ "${arch}" = "x86_32" ] || [ "${arch}" = "x86_64" ]; then
if [ ! -d "${cbdir}/util/crossgcc/xgcc/i386-elf/" ]; then
# Even for 64-bit machines, coreboot builds 32-bit ROM
# images, so we only need to worry about i386-elf
make -C "${cbdir}" crossgcc-i386 CPUS=$(nproc)
fi
case "$(uname -m)" in
x86*|i*86|amd64) : ;;
*) export CROSS_COMPILE=i386-elf- ;;
esac
elif [ "${arch}" = "ARMv7" ]; then
if [ ! -d "${cbdir}/util/crossgcc/xgcc/arm-eabi/" ]; then
make -C "${cbdir}" crossgcc-arm CPUS=$(nproc)
fi
case "$(uname -m)" in
arm|arm32|armv6*|armv7*) : ;;
*) export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi- ;;
esac
elif [ "${arch}" = "AArch64" ]; then
if [ ! -d "${cbdir}/util/crossgcc/xgcc/aarch64-elf/" ]; then
make -C "${cbdir}" crossgcc-aarch64 CPUS=$(nproc)
fi
# aarch64 also needs armv7 toolchain for arm-trusted-firmware
if [ ! -d "${cbdir}/util/crossgcc/xgcc/arm-eabi/" ]; then
make -C "${cbdir}" crossgcc-arm CPUS=$(nproc)
fi
case "$(uname -m)" in
arm64|aarch64) : ;;
*) export CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-elf- ;;
esac
fi
export PATH="$(pwd)/${cbdir}/util/crossgcc/xgcc/bin:$PATH"
}
build_dependency_seabios()
{
if [ ! -f "${seavgabiosrom}" ] \
|| [ ! -f payload/seabios/seabios_libgfxinit.elf ] \
|| [ ! -f payload/seabios/seabios_vgarom.elf ] \
|| [ ! -f payload/seabios/seabios_normal.elf ]; then
if [ "${payload_seabios}" = "y" ]; then
./build payload seabios
elif [ "${payload_grub}" = "y" ] \
&& [ "${payload_grub_withseabios}" = "y" ]
then
./build payload seabios
fi
fi
if [ "${payload_memtest}" = "y" ] && [ ! -f "memtest86plus/memtest" ]
then
./build module memtest86plus
fi
}
build_dependency_grub()
{
if [ "${payload_grub}" != "y" ] \
&& [ "${payload_seabios_withgrub}" != "y" ]; then
return 0
fi
if [ -f "payload/grub/grub_usqwerty.cfg" ]; then
sha1cmd="sha1sum resources/grub/config/grub.cfg"
grubrefchecksum="$(${sha1cmd} | awk '{print $1}')"
sha1cmd="sha1sum payload/grub/grub_usqwerty.cfg"
grubsha1="$(${sha1cmd} | awk '{print $1}')"
if [ "${grubrefchecksum}" != "${grubsha1}" ]; then
rm -Rf payload/grub/
printf "GRUB change detected. Rebuilding:\n"
fi
else
printf "GRUB payloads needed. Building:\n"
rm -Rf payload/grub/ # just in case
fi
for keymapfile in ${kmapdir}/*; do
if [ ! -f "${keymapfile}" ]; then
continue
fi
keymap="${keymapfile##*/}"
keymap="${keymap%.gkb}"
grubelf="payload/grub/grub_${keymap}.elf"
grubcfg="payload/grub/grub_${keymap}.cfg"
grubtestcfg="payload/grub/grub_${keymap}_test.cfg"
if [ ! -f "${grubelf}" ] || [ ! -f "${grubcfg}" ] || \
[ ! -f "${grubtestcfg}" ]; then
./build payload grub
fi
done
}
build_dependency_uboot()
{
if [ "${payload_uboot}" != "y" ]; then
return 0
fi
ubdir=""
if [ "${uboot_config}" = "default" ]; then
ubdir="payload/u-boot/${board}"
else
ubdir="payload/u-boot/${board}/${uboot_config}"
fi
if [ -f "${ubdir}/u-boot.elf" ]; then
ubootelf="${ubdir}/u-boot.elf"
elif [ -f "${ubdir}/u-boot" ]; then
ubootelf="${ubdir}/u-boot"
else
printf "U-Boot needed. Building:\n"
rm -Rf "payload/u-boot/${board}" # just in case
./build payload u-boot "${board}"
fi
}
build_rom_images()
{
[ -d "${romdir}/" ] || mkdir -p "${romdir}/"
rm -f "${romdir}"/*
for initmode in "normal" "vgarom" "libgfxinit"; do
hmode="vesafb"
if [ "${initmode}" != "vgarom" ]; then
hmode="corebootfb"
fi
modes="${hmode} txtmode"
if [ ! -z ${displaymodes} ]; then
modes="${displaymodes}"
fi
for displaymode in ${modes}; do
if [ "${initmode}" = "normal" ] \
&& [ "$displaymode" != "txtmode" ]; then
continue
fi
cbcfg="${boardcfgdir}/config/${initmode}"
cbcfg="${cbcfg}_${displaymode}"
if [ "${initmode}" = "normal" ]; then
cbcfg="${cbcfg%_*}"
fi
mkRoms "${cbcfg}" "${displaymode}" "${initmode}"
done
done
make distclean -BC "${cbdir}"
}
# Main ROM building function. This calls all other functions
mkRoms()
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
{
_cbcfg="${1}"
displaymode="${2}"
initmode="${3}"
if [ ! -f "${_cbcfg}" ]; then
printf "'%s' does not exist. Skipping build for %s %s %s\n" \
${_cbcfg} ${board} \
${displaymode} ${initmode}
return 0
fi
# make coreboot ROM without a payload in it
mkCoreboot "${_cbcfg}"
# now add payloads, per user config:
if [ "${displaymode}" = "txtmode" ] \
&& [ "${payload_memtest}" = "y" ]; then
"${cbfstool}" "${corebootrom}" add-payload \
-f memtest86plus/memtest -n img/memtest \
-c lzma || exit 1
fi
if [ "${payload_seabios}" = "y" ]; then
if [ "${payload_seabios_withgrub}" = "n" ]; then
x=${corebootrom}
y=${initmode}
t=$(mkSeabiosRom "$x" "fallback/payload" "$y")
_newrom="${romdir}/seabios_${board}_${initmode}.rom"
if [ "${initmode}" != "normal" ]; then
_newrom="${_newrom%.rom}_${displaymode}.rom"
fi
# rom image ready to be flashed:
moverom "${t}" "${_newrom}" "${romtype}"
rm -f "${t}"
else
tmprom=$(mktemp -t coreboot_rom.XXXXXXXXXX)
cp "${corebootrom}" "${tmprom}"
mkRomsWithGrub "${tmprom}" "${initmode}" \
"${displaymode}" "seabios_withgrub"
rm -f "${tmprom}"
fi
fi
if [ "${payload_grub}" = "y" ]; then
mkRomsWithGrub "${corebootrom}" "${initmode}" \
"${displaymode}" "grub"
fi
if [ "${payload_uboot}" = "y" ]; then
x=${corebootrom}
y=${uboot_config}
z=${cbfstool}
tmpubootrom="$(mkUbootRom "$x" "fallback/payload" "$y" "$z")"
if [ "${initmode}" = "normal" ]; then
_newrom="${romdir}/uboot_payload_${board}_"
_newrom="${_newrom}${initmode}.rom"
else
_newrom="${romdir}/uboot_payload_${board}_"
_newrom="${_newrom}${initmode}_${displaymode}.rom"
fi
# rom image ready to be flashed:
moverom "${tmpubootrom}" "${_newrom}" "${romtype}"
rm -f "${tmpubootrom}"
fi
}
# expected: configs must not specify a payload
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
mkCoreboot()
{
_cbcfg="${1}" # eg. resources/coreboot/e6400nvidia_4mb/config/normal
if [ ! -f "${_cbcfg}" ]; then
printf "\nmkCoreboot: coreboot config '%s' does not exist. " \
${_cbcfg}
printf "Skipping build.\n"
return 0
fi
printf "%s-%s\n" "$(cat projectname)" "$(cat version)" \
> "${cbdir}/.coreboot-version"
if [ -f "${cbfstool}" ]; then
mv "${cbfstool}" "${cbdir}/cbfstool"
fi
make clean -BC "${cbdir}"
if [ -f "${cbdir}/cbfstool" ]; then
mv "${cbdir}/cbfstool" "${cbfstool}"
fi
cp "${_cbcfg}" "${cbdir}"/.config
./build module cbutils ${cbdir#coreboot/} || exit 1
make -j$(nproc) -BC "${cbdir}"
}
# make a rom in /tmp/ and then print the path of that ROM
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
mkSeabiosRom()
{
target_cbrom="${1}" # rom to insert seabios in. will not be touched
# (a tmpfile will be made instead)
target_seabios_cbfs_path="${2}" # e.g. fallback/payload
target_initmode="${3}" # e.g. libgfxinit
target_seabioself="payload/seabios/seabios_${target_initmode}.elf"
target_seavgabios_rom="payload/seabios/seavgabios.bin"
tmprom=$(mktemp -t coreboot_rom.XXXXXXXXXX)
cp "${target_cbrom}" "${tmprom}"
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add-payload -f "${target_seabioself}" \
-n ${target_seabios_cbfs_path} -c lzma || exit 1
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add-int -i 3000 -n etc/ps2-keyboard-spinup \
|| exit 1
if [ "${target_initmode}" = "normal" ] \
|| [ "${target_initmode}" = "libgfxinit" ]; then
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add-int -i 2 \
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
-n etc/pci-optionrom-exec || exit 1
elif [ "${target_initmode}" = "vgarom" ]; then # coreboot executes it
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add-int -i 0 \
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
-n etc/pci-optionrom-exec || exit 1
fi # for undefined modes, don't add this integer. use SeaBIOS defaults
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add-int -i 0 -n etc/optionroms-checksum \
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
|| exit 1
if [ "${target_initmode}" = "libgfxinit" ]; then
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add -f "${target_seavgabios_rom}" \
-n vgaroms/seavgabios.bin -t raw || exit 1
fi
printf "%s\n" "${tmprom}"
}
# Make separate ROM images with GRUB payload, for each supported keymap
mkRomsWithGrub()
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
{
tmprompath="${1}"
initmode="${2}"
displaymode="${3}"
firstpayloadname="${4}" # allow values: grub, seabios, seabios_withgrub
x=${tmprompath}
y=${initmode}
if [ "${payload_grub_withseabios}" = "y" ] \
&& [ "${firstpayloadname}" = "grub" ]; then
mv "$(mkSeabiosRom "${x}" "seabios.elf" "${y}")" \
"${tmprompath}"
elif [ "${payload_seabios_withgrub}" ] \
&& [ "${firstpayloadname}" != "grub" ]; then
mv "$(mkSeabiosRom "${x}" "fallback/payload" "${y}")" \
"${tmprompath}"
fi
keymaps=""
if [ -z ${keyboard_layouts} ]; then
for kmapfile in "${kmapdir}"/*; do
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
keymaps+=" ${kmapfile}"
done
else
for keymapname in ${keyboard_layouts}; do
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
keymaps+=" ${kmapdir}/${keymapname}.gkb"
done
fi
for keymapfile in ${keymaps}; do
if [ ! -f "${keymapfile}" ]; then
continue
fi
keymap="${keymapfile##*/}"
keymap="${keymap%.gkb}"
grub_path_in_cbfs="fallback/payload"
if [ "${firstpayloadname}" != "grub" ]; then
grub_path_in_cbfs="img/grub2"
fi
# evil bofh rfc 2646 compliance hack
x=${keymap}
y=${tmprompath}
z=${grub_path_in_cbfs}
tmpgrubrom="$(mkGrubRom "${x}" "${y}" "${z}")"
_newrom="${romdir}/${firstpayloadname}_${board}_${initmode}_"
if [ "${initmode}" = "normal" ]; then
_newrom="${_newrom}${keymap}.rom"
else
_newrom="${_newrom}${displaymode}_${keymap}.rom"
fi
# rom image ready to be flashed:
moverom "${tmpgrubrom}" "${_newrom}" "${romtype}"
rm -f "${tmpgrubrom}"
done
}
# make a rom in /tmp/ and then print the path of that ROM
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
mkGrubRom()
{
target_keymap="${1}"
target_cbrom="${2}"
target_grubelf_cbfs_path="${3}" # e.g. fallback/payload
grubelf="payload/grub/grub_${target_keymap}.elf"
grubcfg="payload/grub/grub_${target_keymap}.cfg"
grubtestcfg="payload/grub/grub_${target_keymap}_test.cfg"
tmprom=$(mktemp -t coreboot_rom.XXXXXXXXXX) || exit 1
cp "${target_cbrom}" "${tmprom}" || exit 1
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add-payload -f "${grubelf}" \
-n ${target_grubelf_cbfs_path} -c lzma || exit 1
tmpgrubcfg=$(mktemp -t grub.cfg.XXXXXXXXXX)
tmpgrubtestcfg=$(mktemp -t grubtest.cfg.XXXXXXXXXX)
2021-11-27 19:06:32 +00:00
if [ "${grub_scan_disk}" = "ahci" ]; then
sed \
's/set\ grub_scan_disk=\"both\"/set\ grub_scan_disk=\"ahci\"/' \
"${grubcfg}" > "${tmpgrubcfg}"
sed \
's/set\ grub_scan_disk=\"both\"/set\ grub_scan_disk=\"ahci\"/' \
"${grubtestcfg}" > "${tmpgrubtestcfg}"
2021-11-27 19:06:32 +00:00
elif [ "${grub_scan_disk}" = "ata" ]; then
sed \
's/set\ grub_scan_disk=\"both\"/set\ grub_scan_disk=\"ata\"/' \
"${grubcfg}" > "${tmpgrubcfg}"
sed \
's/set\ grub_scan_disk=\"both\"/set\ grub_scan_disk=\"ata\"/' \
"${grubtestcfg}" > "${tmpgrubtestcfg}"
else
cp "${grubcfg}" "${tmpgrubcfg}"
cp "${grubtestcfg}" "${tmpgrubtestcfg}"
2021-11-27 19:06:32 +00:00
fi
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add -f "${tmpgrubcfg}" -n grub.cfg -t raw \
|| exit 1
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add -f "${tmpgrubtestcfg}" -n grubtest.cfg \
-t raw || exit 1
rm -f "${tmpgrubcfg}" "${tmpgrubtestcfg}"
backgroundfile="background1280x800.png"
if [ "${board}" = "x60" ] || [ "${board}" = "t60_intelgpu" ]; then
# TODO: don't hardcode this. do it in board.cfg per board
backgroundfile="background1024x768.png"
fi
backgroundfile="resources/grub/background/${backgroundfile}"
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add -f ${backgroundfile} -n background.png \
-t raw || exit 1
printf "%s\n" "${tmprom}"
}
# make a rom in /tmp/ and then print the path of that ROM
mkUbootRom()
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
{
target_cbrom="${1}" # rom to insert u-boot in. it won't be touched
# (a tmpfile will be made instead)
target_uboot_cbfs_path="${2}" # e.g. fallback/payload
target_uboot_config="${3}"
cbfstool_path="${4}"
if [ "${target_uboot_config}" = "default" ]; then
target_ubdir="payload/u-boot/${board}"
else
target_ubdir="payload/u-boot/${board}/${target_uboot_config}"
fi
if [ -f "${target_ubdir}/u-boot.elf" ]; then
target_ubootelf="${target_ubdir}/u-boot.elf"
elif [ -f "${target_ubdir}/u-boot" ]; then
target_ubootelf="${target_ubdir}/u-boot"
fi
tmprom=$(mktemp -t coreboot_rom.XXXXXXXXXX)
cp "${target_cbrom}" "${tmprom}"
"${cbfstool}" "${tmprom}" add-payload -f "${target_ubootelf}" \
-n ${target_uboot_cbfs_path} -c lzma || exit 1
printf "%s\n" "${tmprom}"
}
# it is assumed that no other work will be done on the ROM
# after calling this function. therefore this function is "final"
moverom()
2023-05-10 04:09:10 +00:00
{
rompath="$1"
_newrom="$2"
cuttype="$3"
printf "\nCreating new ROM image: %s\n" "${_newrom}"
cp ${rompath} ${_newrom}
if [ "${cuttype}" = "i945 laptop" ]; then
dd if=${_newrom} of=top64k.bin bs=1 \
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
skip=$[$(stat -c %s ${_newrom}) - 0x10000] \
count=64k
Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-25 20:54:59 +00:00
dd if=top64k.bin of=${_newrom} bs=1 seek=$[$(stat -c %s \
${_newrom}) - 0x20000] count=64k conv=notrunc
rm -f top64k.bin
2023-05-13 00:27:00 +00:00
return 0
fi
2023-05-13 00:27:00 +00:00
for romsize in 4 8 16; do
for x in "IFD" "IFD NOGBE"; do
if [ "${romsize}MiB ICH9 ${x} NOR flash" \
!= "${cuttype}" ]; then
continue
fi
c=4
ifdgbe="descriptors/ich9m/ich9fdnogbe_${romsize}m.bin"
if [ "${x}" = "IFD" ]; then
c=12
ifdgbe="descriptors/ich9m/ich9fdgbe_${romsize}m.bin"
fi
if [ ! -f "${ifdgbe}" ]; then
./build descriptors ich9m
fi
dd if=${ifdgbe} of=${_newrom} bs=${c}k count=1 \
2023-05-13 00:27:00 +00:00
conv=notrunc
done
done
}
main $@