Commit Graph

10 Commits (28682b1a4bde9d0dc3fcea51efa3e70aa62b7f30)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leah Rowe 3998a3ba48 re-configure grub_scan_disk on various targets
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-27 21:33:53 +01:00
Leah Rowe 1c4d649848 remove grub_scan_disk in all target.cfg files
A subsequest revision will set them again as needed,
per coreboot target.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-27 20:41:11 +01:00
Leah Rowe ec761c88f2 coreboot: only run GRUB as a secondary payload
See:
https://codeberg.org/libreboot/lbmk/issues/216

Almost all users will be OK running GRUB, but a
minority of users have experienced a fatal error
pertaining to grub_free() or grub_realloc() (as
my investigation of GRUB sources reveal when grepping
the error reported in the link above).

We don't yet know what the bug is, only that the
error occurs, leading to an effective brick if the
user has GRUB as their primary payload.

So far, it has only been reported on some Intel
SandyBridge-based Dell Latitudes in Libreboot, but
we can't be too sure.

The user reported that memtest86+ passes just fine,
and SeaBIOS works; BIOS GRUB also works, which means
that the bug is likely only in an area of GRUB that
runs specifically on the coreboot payload, so it's
probably a driver in GRUB when running on the metal
rather than BIOS/UEFI.

The build system supports a configuration whereby
SeaBIOS is the primary payload, but GRUB is available
in the SeaBIOS boot select menu, and an additional
configuration is available where GRUB is what SeaBIOS
executes first (while still providing boot select);
both of these are now the *only* configurations
available, on all x86 targets except QEMU.

The QEMU target is fine because if the bug occurs there,
you can just close QEMU and try a different image.

Even after this bug is later identified and fixed,
the GRUB source code is vastly over-engineered and there
are likely many more such bugs. SeaBIOS is a reliable
payload; the code is small and robust. Remember always:

Code

equals

bugs

Therefore, this configuration change is likely going
to be permanent. This will apply in the next release.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-27 14:24:26 +01:00
Leah Rowe 05fbd39298 remove all status checks. only handle release.
the release variable is all we need, turning a target on
or off for a given release.

the status checks were prone to bugs, and unnecessary; it
also broke certain benchmark scripts.

it's better to keep the lbmk logic simpler. board status
will be moved to the documentation instead.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-11 18:53:12 +01:00
Leah Rowe 1fd9ba9ae0 declare ivy/sandy thinkpads stable for release
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-04-27 14:51:59 +01:00
Leah Rowe ce7fd754a3 build/roms: report status when building images
export LBMK_VERSION_TYPE=x
x can be: stable, unstable

in target.cfg files, specify:
status=x
x can be: stable, unstable, broken, untested
if unset, lbmk defaults to "unknown"

if LBMK_VERSION_TYPE is set, no confirmation is asked
if the given target matches what's set (but what's set
in that environmental variable can only be stable or
unstable)

if LBMK_RELEASE="y", no confirmation is asked, unless
the target is something other than stable/unstable

"unstable" means it works, but has a few non-breaking
bugs, e.g. broken s3 on dell e6400

whereas, if raminit regularly fails or it is so absolutely
unreliable as to be unusable, then the board should be
declared "broken"

untested means: it has not been tested

With this change, it should now be easier to track whether
a given board is tested, in preparation for releases. When
working on trees/boards, status can be set for targets.

Also: in the board directory, you can add a "warn.txt" file
which will display a message. For example, if a board has a
particular quirk to watch out for, write that there. The message
will be printed during the build process, to stdout.

If status is anything *other* than stable, or it is unstable
but LBMK_VERSION_TYPE is not set to "unstable", and not building
a release, a confirmation is passed.

If the board is not specified as stable or unstable, during
a release build, the build is skipped and the ROM is not
provided in that release; this is in *addition* to
release="n" or release="y" that can be set in target.cfg,
which will skip the release build for that target if "n"

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-04-26 20:36:42 +01:00
Leah Rowe eff9130b7a update/trees: further simplify crossgcc handling
arch no longer needs to be set, on multi-tree projects,
and it has been renamed to xarch

the new behaviour is: if xarch is set, treat it as a
list of crossgcc targets and go through the list. set
the first one as the target, for what lbmk builds, but
build all of the defined crossgccc targets

crossgcc_ada is now xlang, and defines which languages
to build, rather than whether to build gcc-gnat

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-12-27 16:07:32 +00:00
Leah Rowe 92986f0c42 build/roms: remove modify_coreboot_rom()
don't handle "romtype" at all, in board target.cfg files

add /dev/null as pike2008 rom on amd boards. this serves
the same purpose, adding them as empty vga roms, to add
an empty rom in cbfs. pike2008 cards cause seabios to hang,
when their oproms are executed, so we insert a fake rom

on i945 thinkpads, use the coreboot config option:
CONFIG_INTEL_ADD_TOP_SWAP_BOOTBLOCK

when set, this enables the same bootblock copy, for use
with bucts. these two cases, namely pike2008 roms and
i945 bootblock copies, no longer need to be handled in code

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-12-21 19:26:22 +00:00
Leah Rowe 90ac30b163 update/trees: simplified crossgcc handling
only call crossgcc for coreboot and u-boot, but use
hostcc for everything else. simplify the checking of
which architecture to compile for. "arch" in target.cfg
files has been modified, to allow further simplification.

without this patch, the logic currently only *barely* avoids
using crossgcc on things like utils, and only works in practise
because, in practise, lbmk only works on x86_64 anyway.

the new logic, as per this patch, is simpler and more robust.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-12-21 14:18:51 +00:00
Leah Rowe da3c9bb3c5 merge config/ and resources/
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-09-04 02:47:25 +01:00