Commit Graph

5 Commits (47112968411558bc832a867c1b7bc90884eded75)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leah Rowe b0d1ad32fa git.sh: support downloading *files* as submodules
when we download coreboot, we currently don't have a way to
download crossgcc tarballs, so we rely on coreboot to do it,
which means running the coreboot build system to do it; which
means we don't get them in release archives, unless we add
very hacky logic (which did exist and was removed).

the problem with coreboot's build system is that it does not
define backup links for each given tarball, instead relying
on gnu.org exclusively, which seems OK at first because the
gnu.org links actually return an HTTP 302 response leading
to a random mirror, HOWEVER:

the gnu.org 302 redirect often fails, and the download fails,
causing an error. a mitigation for this has been to patch the
coreboot build system to download directly from a single mirror
that is reliable (in our case mirrorservice.org).

while this mitigation mostly works, it's not redundant; the
kent mirror is occasionally down too, and again we still have
the problem of not being able to cleanly provide crossgcc
tarballs inside release archives.

do it in config/submodules, like so:

module.list shall say the relative path of a given file,
once downloaded, relative to the given source tree.

module.cfg shall be re-used, in the same way as for git
submodules, but:

subfile="url"
subfile_bkup="backup url"

do this, instead of:

subrepo="url"
subrepo_bkup="backup url"

example entries in module.list:

util/crossgcc/tarballs/binutils-2.41.tar.xz
util/crossgcc/tarballs/gcc-13.2.0.tar.xz
util/crossgcc/tarballs/gmp-6.3.0.tar.xz
util/crossgcc/tarballs/mpc-1.3.1.tar.gz
util/crossgcc/tarballs/mpfr-4.2.1.tar.xz
util/crossgcc/tarballs/nasm-2.16.01.tar.bz2
util/crossgcc/tarballs/R06_28_23.tar.gz

the "subrev" variable (in module.cfg) has been renamed
to "subhash", so that this makes sense, and that name is
common to both subfile/subrepo.

the download logic from the vendor scripts has been re-used
for this purpose, and it verifies files using sha512sum.
therefore:

when specifying subrepo(git submodule), subhash will still
be a sha1 checksum, but:

when specifying subfile(file, e.g. tarball), subhash will
be a sha512 checksum

the logic for both (subrepo and subfile) is unified, and
has this rule:

subrepo* and subfile* must never *both* be declared.

the actual configuration of coreboot crossgcc tarballs
will be done in a follow-up commit. this commit simply
modifies the code to accomodate this.

over time, this feature could be used for many other files
within source trees, and could perhaps be expanded to allow
extracting source tarballs in leiu of git repositories, but
the latter is not yet required and thus not implemented.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-06-08 05:44:53 +01:00
Luke T. Shumaker 221206b4da Fix building vboot on i686 2024-05-30 17:40:37 -06:00
Leah Rowe b91ee72762 config: add backup coreboot submodule repositories
this is using the same functionality that was added a few
commits ago, to override the use of "git submodule update"

each coreboot submodule has two repositories defined, with
the second one kicking in if the mail one fails upon cloning.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-24 23:42:05 +01:00
Leah Rowe fdb08143e4 coreboot: only download the necessary submodules
whitelist what modules are downloaded, by adding
module.list files in the corresponding directories
under config/submodule/, per each coreboot tree.

this is making use of functionality added in the
previous commit.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-24 19:30:43 +01:00
Leah Rowe e5a5935d8d fix building coreboot images on i686 hosts
firstly, memtest86+ is currently not cross compiled and
relies on 64-bit headers (x86_64 only). a 32-bit distro
is unlikely to be able to build 64-bit binaries.

secondly: vboot throws a build error due to -Werror when
building on 32-bit hosts. we rely on vboot code to build
cbfstool, so turn off -Werror on vboot

that's all. 32-bit hosts are not recommended; it is assumed
that you are building on an x86_64 host. work will go into
the build system at a later date to make it more portable,
by cross compiling everything, but this should fix 32-bit
for now.

there are some x60/t60 users who still want to build roms,
so let's allow them that possibility.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-21 23:40:25 +01:00