8fb54e801f
small nitpick, but i try to use openbsd style since i like that style. upon further reading of their style guidelines today, it was revealed to me that for includes, they: * sort sys/ includes alphabetically, at the top * after sys/ includes, have an empty line * includes for networking-related headers below that * empty space below networking headers if there * after that, have the rest of the includes, sorted alphabetically at least, that is my understanding. i have to admit, it does look cleaner not really that critical but why not do it? |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
AUTHORS | ||
COPYING | ||
ChangeLog.md | ||
Makefile | ||
README.md | ||
nvmutil.c |
README.md
This documentation has become part of lbwww. See: