242 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
242 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
% GNU Boot
|
||
% Leah Rowe
|
||
% 17 July 2023
|
||
|
||
**UPDATE, 27 October 2023: The Censored Libreboot and nonGeNUine Boot websites have merged
|
||
into a new project, called Canoeboot. Canoeboot is a new Libreboot-endorsed
|
||
spinoff project (official fork).**
|
||
|
||
**See: [Canoeboot 20231026 release](https://canoeboot.org/news/canoeboot20231026.html) -
|
||
the original article below showed a desire to work with GNU Boot, but it has
|
||
now been decided that Canoeboot will be an official project of Libreboot,
|
||
providing releases under the old [Binary Blob Elimination
|
||
Policy](https://web.archive.org/web/20221107235850/https://libreboot.org/news/policy.html) (instead of
|
||
Libreboot's current [Binary Blob Reduction Policy](policy.md)).**
|
||
|
||
**The situation on 27 October 2023 is not much different, in substance. Please
|
||
see: [Canoeboot vs GNU Boot](https://canoeboot.org/gnuboot.html) - Canoeboot
|
||
will now compete with GNU Boot, rather than try to assist it; they didn't accept
|
||
Libreboot's help anyway.**
|
||
|
||
Original article as it was written, 17 July 2023:
|
||
=================================================
|
||
|
||
People have been waiting for me to break the silence about this. I go on about
|
||
it on IRC. This article is intended to address it once and for all, officially.
|
||
|
||
I waited so long, because until recently there really wasn't anything tangible
|
||
to talk about; why talk about vaporware? Why indeed.
|
||
|
||
Introduction!
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
This doesn't need to be an overly long post, so it won't be. There is a *fork*
|
||
of Libreboot, named GNU Boot, which you can find on the GNU Savannah website.
|
||
|
||
Long story short, when I saw this, I decided that I would try to *help* the
|
||
project. More on this next:
|
||
|
||
non-GeNUine Boot 20230717 release
|
||
------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
If you want to skip the lecture, just read these first and re-visit this
|
||
page (the one you're reading now) afterwards for more context:
|
||
|
||
* **non-GeNUine Boot 20230717, unofficial release (produced by *me*):
|
||
<https://notgnuboot.vimuser.org/news/nongenuineboot20230717.html> - based on the
|
||
recent [Libreboot 20230625](libreboot20230625.md) release**, but modified to
|
||
comply with GNU Boot policy, as best as I could approximate.
|
||
I *encourage them* to re-use this work. It's roughly *8 months* ahead
|
||
of their current work.
|
||
|
||
Or generally: **<https://notgnuboot.vimuser.org/> - non-GeNUine Boot website**
|
||
|
||
These links, above, are for an *unofficial* fork of Libreboot that *I* have
|
||
done myself, proposed for re-use by the new GNU Boot project. I am *not* a
|
||
member of the GNU Boot project, but I do want to see it succeed.
|
||
|
||
GNU Boot? What is that, you ask me? It is a fork of Libreboot by the GNU
|
||
project, but it currently does not have a website and does not have any
|
||
releases of its own. My intent is to *help them*, and they are free - encouraged -
|
||
to re-use my work, linked above.
|
||
|
||
GNU forked Libreboot?
|
||
=====================
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
----
|
||
|
||
They forked Libreboot, due to disagreement with Libreboot's [Binary Blob
|
||
Reduction Policy](policy.md). This is a pragmatic policy, enacted in November
|
||
2022, to increase the number of coreboot users by increasing the amount of
|
||
hardware supported in Libreboot. Libreboot's [Freedom
|
||
Status](../freedom-status.md) page describes in great detail, how that policy
|
||
is implemented - the last few Libreboot releases have *vastly* expanded the
|
||
list of hardware supported, which you can read [here](../docs/hardware/).
|
||
|
||
I wish GNU Boot all the best success. Truly. Although I think their project is
|
||
entirely misguided (for reasons explained by modern Libreboot policy), I do
|
||
think there is value in it. It provides continuity for those who wish to use
|
||
something resembling the old Libreboot project; some context:
|
||
|
||
osboot
|
||
------
|
||
|
||
Previously, another project
|
||
started by me named [osboot](https://web.archive.org/web/20220714144846/https://osboot.org/)
|
||
existed - osboot, created in December 2020, ran for just under two years as
|
||
a separate project, and it very much resembled what Libreboot is today.
|
||
|
||
osboot was a fork of Libreboot, that I created *myself*, and maintained in
|
||
parallel to Libreboot. The old osboot Git repositories are *still available*
|
||
here, archived for historical purposes: <https://notabug.org/osboot>
|
||
|
||
osboot/libreboot merge
|
||
----------------------
|
||
|
||
In November 2022, I *shut down* osboot's website and redirected it to the
|
||
Libreboot website, merging all of its documentation and additional code into
|
||
Libreboot. Libreboot *adopted* OSBoot policy, verbatim. The [Binary Blob
|
||
Reduction Policy](policy.md) *is* that policy - the [old Libreboot
|
||
policy](https://web.archive.org/web/20221107235850/https://libreboot.org/news/policy.html)
|
||
was declared obsolete, and abandoned - the main problem with it, and the problem
|
||
with GNU Boot today which is based on it, is that it limited the amount of
|
||
hardware that Libreboot could support.
|
||
|
||
OSBoot was always the superior project, and Libreboot was practically dead,
|
||
so I saw nothing to lose and just did it. I merged them together.
|
||
|
||
So why talk about GNU Boot?
|
||
===========================
|
||
|
||
Ordinarily, I would ignore other projects; it's not that I'm bothered by them,
|
||
it's just that I have Libreboot, which pleases me, and therefore I have no need
|
||
to worry about the others. They can sort themselves out. I work collaboratively
|
||
with a few other coreboot distros; for example, I sometimes provide advice or
|
||
ideas to the [Heads](https://osresearch.net/) project (a very interesting
|
||
project, superior to Libreboot in many ways). I recently helped them by offering
|
||
to host tarballs for them, that they use in their build system.
|
||
|
||
But that's just the problem: when GNU Boot first launched, as a failed *hostile
|
||
fork* of Libreboot *under the same name*, I observed: their code repository
|
||
was based on Libreboot from late 2022, and their website based on Libreboot in
|
||
late 2021. Their same-named Libreboot site was announced during LibrePlanet
|
||
2023, by this video:
|
||
<https://media.libreplanet.org/u/libreplanet/m/taking-control-over-the-means-of-production-free-software-boot/> -
|
||
their speaker is Denis Carikli, an early contributor to Libreboot, who you can
|
||
read about here: <https://libreplanet.org/2023/speakers/#6197>. Denis is one
|
||
of the founders of that project.
|
||
|
||
Well, now they are calling themselves *GNU Boot*, and it is indeed GNU, but it
|
||
still has the same problem as of *today*: still based on very old Libreboot,
|
||
and they don't *even* have a website. According to Savannah, GNU Boot was
|
||
created on 11 June 2023. Yet no real development, in over a month since then.
|
||
|
||
I have this itch in the back of my mind, that says: if you're going to do
|
||
something, you should *do it*. When someone expresses disagreement with what
|
||
I say, I can respect it if it's more than just words, which is all
|
||
what they had given at the time of this article.
|
||
|
||
I value *technical excellence*.
|
||
|
||
So *why talk about it??*
|
||
---------------------
|
||
|
||
Simple: I've decided that I want to **help them**. Refer to the links above, in
|
||
the early section of this article. I decided recently that I'd simply make a
|
||
release *for them*, exactly to their specifications (GNU Free System
|
||
Distribution Guidelines), talking favourably about FSF/GNU, and so on. I'm in
|
||
a position to *do it* (thus scratching the itch), so why not?
|
||
|
||
**I did this release for them:
|
||
<https://notgnuboot.vimuser.org/news/nongenuineboot20230717.html>** - it's designated *non-GeNUine
|
||
Boot 20230717*, and I encourage them to re-use this in their project, to get
|
||
off the ground. This completely leapfrogs their current development; it's
|
||
months ahead. *Months*. **It's 8 months ahead**, since their current revision
|
||
is based upon Libreboot from around ~October 2022.
|
||
|
||
The most remarkable thing of all is this: in December 2022 is when I first
|
||
learned of their supposed effort. They tried to poach several Libreboot developers
|
||
behind my back,
|
||
but none of them were interested it seems, and one of them leaked the existence
|
||
of their effort to me. I knew *three months* before they announced that they
|
||
were going to announce something, and I reliably predicted it'd be at LibrePlanet.
|
||
|
||
The most absurd thing of that is: why did they not contact *me*?
|
||
|
||
The GNU people should have simply contacted me from the start. I *would* have
|
||
helped them. I did Libreboot releases under their policies for *years*, and I
|
||
know what I'm doing. Ideology aside, I enjoy fun technical challenges; I have a
|
||
wide depth of knowledge and expertise. *I offer it now*, as I have today, and
|
||
will continue to do so. I offer my *support*, in service to it, even if I would
|
||
personally never use nor recommend their project. One of the purposes of today's
|
||
article is simply to tell people they exist, because I hope maybe they'll get
|
||
more devs. They use the same build system as Libreboot, so Libreboot could even
|
||
merge a lot of any actual code/ideas that they produce (and they can merge our
|
||
work - *and I want them to do that*).
|
||
|
||
There were/are more things to talk about, but I'm not really interested in
|
||
writing more. Free as in freedom? Libreboot is a free software project, yet
|
||
GNU propaganda says otherwise.
|
||
|
||
GNU Boot is [inferior](../policy.md#problems-with-fsdg) to Libreboot in every
|
||
way, just as Libreboot was inferior to OSBoot before the Libreboot/OSBoot
|
||
merge; since modern (post-merge) Libreboot still provides the same blob-free
|
||
configurations on
|
||
mainboards when that is possible, GNU Boot is also a *pointless* project,
|
||
just as Libreboot was before I merged osboot with it, but I digress.
|
||
|
||
What more is there to say?
|
||
|
||
Happy hacking!
|
||
|
||
UPDATE (21 July 2023)
|
||
=====================
|
||
|
||
The non-GeNUine Boot website, and the non-GeNUine release itself,
|
||
was originally *named* GNU Boot, but clearly marked as *unofficial*, with the
|
||
hope that the GNU project would adapt and re-use it for their project. I did
|
||
this, specifically to help them get up to date. They currently use Libreboot
|
||
from about 8 months ago (late 2022), and that revision used *coreboot* releases
|
||
from ~mid 2021.
|
||
|
||
Libreboot regularly updates to newer coreboot revisions, containing many fixes
|
||
in its build system, and engages in active [build system
|
||
audit](audit.html); GNU Boot is poorly audited. GNU Boot as of now has bugs
|
||
such as: errors literally not
|
||
being handled, in many critical areas of the build system, due to improper use
|
||
of subshells within shell scripts (Libreboot's build system is implemented with
|
||
shell scripts), improper handling of git credentials in the coreboot build
|
||
system, fam15h boards no longer compiling correct on modern Linux distros...
|
||
the list goes on. All fixed, in newer Libreboot, including the recent release.
|
||
|
||
GNU Boot cease and desist email
|
||
-------------------------------
|
||
|
||
The GNU Boot people actually sent me a cease and desist email, citing trademark
|
||
infringement. Amazing.
|
||
|
||
Despite the [nonGeNUine Boot](https://notgnuboot.vimuser.org/) site having
|
||
clearly stating that it's unofficial, and *not* the GNU Boot project. I
|
||
literally made it to help them. You know, to help them use newer Libreboot
|
||
because they use old Libreboot and even older coreboot.
|
||
|
||
Anyway, I complied with their polite request and have renamed the project to
|
||
non-GeNUine Boot. The release archive was re-compiled, under this new brand
|
||
name and the website was re-written accordingly.
|
||
|
||
Personally, I like the new name better.
|
||
|
||
Here is a screenshot of the cease and desist request that I received,
|
||
from *Adrien ‘neox’ Bourmault* who is a founding member of the GNU Boot
|
||
project:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
This, after they themselves tried to steal the name *Libreboot* for their
|
||
fork, when they first announced themselves on 19 March 2023 at LibrePlanet,
|
||
only renaming to *GNU Boot* months later (on 11 June 2023). Utter hypocrisy,
|
||
and a great irony to boot.
|
||
|
||
I may very well send patches. *If I want to*.
|