Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
Upstream updated a dependency that is on an adjacent line to a
glitch-soc-only dependency in that file.
Updated as upstream did.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream updated a dependency that is on an adjacent line to a
glitch-soc-only dependency in that file.
Updated as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `config/routes/api.rb`:
glitch-soc has an extra `:destroy` action on notifications for historical reasons.
Kept it for now, while otherwise updating as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Changes were already cherry-picked and updated further in glitch-soc.
Kept glitch-soc's version.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, we have a completely different one.
Kept glitch-soc's README.
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream updated some lines textually adjacent
to glitch-soc-specific lines.
Ported upstream's changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/lib/settings/scoped_settings.rb`:
Removed upstream, while glitch-soc had a change related to its theming system.
Removed as well, as it's unused.
Conflicts:
- `app/lib/content_security_policy.rb`:
Conflict caused by glitch-soc's support for the extra `EXTRA_DATA_HOSTS`
environment variable.
Ported upstream's changes while keeping support for `EXTRA_DATA_HOSTS`.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Upstream changed code style change, including on a line modified by glitch-soc.
Kept glitch-soc's line but with the code style change applied.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Conflict caused by the `json` gem thing once again.
Updated as upstream did, but keeping the most recent `json` version.
- `spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb`:
Upstream refactored a bunch of specs, including one place that differs
because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Refactored as upstream did, adapting it for glitch-soc's theming system.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream reworked the CSP, we kept our version for now.
- `spec/requests/content_security_policy_spec.rb`:
Upstream reworked the CSP, we kept our version for now.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/relationships_controller.rb`:
We differed by listing suspended users when requesting relationships.
Updated to upstream's code.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Conflict because we had updated the `json-ld` gem to fix a yanked dependency.
Kept our version of `json-ld` while updating other dependencies.
Conflicts:
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream enforced new code style rules, where we had different code.
Applied the new code style rules.
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
Upstream removed a dependency textually close to a glitch-only dependency.
Updated as upstream while keeping our dependency.
* Revert "Fix image and media loading when using external storage server"
This reverts commit 6cfa0245ca.
* Revert "Change glitch-soc's CSP config to match upstream's closer (#2474)"
This reverts commit d59196e170.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream changed how asset host CSP directives are used, and glitch-soc has
a pretty different CSP file.
It may be worth reconsidering the differences between upstream and glitch-soc
but for now, just port the change.
Conflicts:
- `spec/controllers/api/v1/timelines/tag_controller_spec.rb`:
Glitch-soc had a few extra lines in this file to account for a different
default setting. This file got replaced by
`spec/requests/api/v1/timelines/tag_spec.rb`, into which the glitch-soc
additions were moved too.
Additional changes:
- `spec/requests/api/v1/statuses/sources_spec.rb`:
Add glitch-soc-only attribute `content_type`.
Conflicts:
- `config/environments/production.rb`:
Upstream enforced a code style change and glitch-soc had a few different lines.
Applied upstream's code style to glitch-soc's changes.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/cors.rb`:
Upstream refactored this file, and glitch-soc had local changes.
I could not find the rationale for the glitch-soc changes, so I
used upstream's version.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream added some code to add the Identity Provider's sign-in endpoint to
the `form-action` Content Security Policy directive but our version of the
file is pretty different.
Ported the change.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Upstream added the notion of overriden settings, while we had extra code for
pseudo-settings (only used to combine flavour and skin in a single select
field).
Ported upstream changes.
- `config/i18n-tasks.yml`:
Upstream added `simple_form.overridden` to `ignore_unused`,
we had `simple_form.glitch_only`.
Added `simple_form.glitch_only` as well.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/settings/preferences/other/show.html.haml`:
Upstream moved some settings, where glitch-soc has an extra setting.
Ported upstream changes, moving the same settings as them.
Conflicts:
- `.rubocop_todo.yml`:
Upstream regenerated this file, glitch-soc had a specific ignore.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, but glitch-soc has a completely different one.
Kept glitch-soc's README
Matt Jankowski