The SPLIT_BEGIN item gets tucked underneath the ADD item on the top of
the undo stack. Thus: that SPLIT_BEGIN item should copy the 'wassize'
of the ADD item instead of storing the current buffer size.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57832.
Bug existed since the undo functionality was added, and existed
in this form since version 2.3.5, commit be10c2a4.
In theory this would allow injecting more than one character at a time
into the edit buffer. But the creation and updating of an undo item for
the addition or the deletion of a character are a bit strange. For all
other operations and add_undo() is called before the operation, and an
update_undo() afterward. But for an ADD, the add_undo() is called after
the operation, and for a DEL/BACK, the update_undo() is called before
the operation. There is some logic to that, but things would be easier
to understand if all operations were handled the same: an add_undo()
beforehand (when needed), and an update_undo() afterward.
When something is pasted or inserted onto the final, empty line of a
buffer, an automatic new magic line is created after it, when needed.
When this paste or insertion is undone, the added magic line should
also be removed again.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57808.
Bug existed since the undo capabilities were added,
since before version 2.3.0.
When the user (unexpectedly) types a multibyte character after M-V,
put its first byte back into the keyboard buffer, so that the next
call of process_a_keystroke() will retrieve the byte sequence as a
whole, and will inject them as one character into the edit buffer.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57804.
Bug existed since version 2.6.3, commit 08c51cfd.
Using straightforward comparisons is clearer and faster and shorter.
Again, note that this does not filter out 0x7F (DEL). But that is
okay, as that code will never be returned from get_kbinput().
The few calls of the injection routines that had 'filtering' set to
TRUE have already filtered out ASCII control codes earlier on. And
in the case of injecting a completion, this completion only contains
word-forming characters -- and if the user somehow added a control
code to the word-forming characters, then nano should NOT filter it
out, so in fact that setting of 'filtering' to TRUE was mistaken.
Note that this filtering did not filter out 0x7F (DEL). But that is
fine: it should not occur in the input stream at that point anyway,
as it gets translated to either KEY_DC or KEY_BACKSPACE earlier in
the keyboard parsing routines.
When opening multiple files, and the first of them has a lock file,
and the user chooses to not open the corresponding file, then nano
should NOT create an empty buffer in its stead.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57777.
Bug existed since lock files were introduced, in version 2.4.0,
specifically since commit 6948d2e7.
When copy-pasting has resulted in a nanorc file with DOS line endings
(CR+LF), then silently ignore the carriage return, to avoid printing
an error message that partly overwrites itself.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57756.
Requested-by: Matthias Aßhauer <mha1993@live.de>
Since the previous commit, nano exits from curses mode soon after
this message is printed, so that the user does not have any time
to read it or even see it.
When invoking the "internal" speller, leave curses mode while the three
programs in the pipe array are executing, to prevent 'hunspell' from
writing a long error message to the end of the status bar, making the
screen scroll, and thus messing it up. Now the error message gets
printed to the screen that nano was started up from, and will thus be
visible when the user exits from nano. (At least: it will be so on a
terminal emulator -- on a VT, nothing will be seen.)
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57728.
Bug existed since version 4.6, commit 4d77e0ad.
When at startup the user presses Cancel at the "open anyway?" prompt,
cancel the whole startup: quit. But when the user answers No, just
skip the file and continue starting up.
Don't bother looping until the 1024 bytes are read. Writing the lock
file takes just one shot too, and that is more important to get right.
Also, correct the type for the result of read(), so that -1 doesn't
get turned into a positive number, which would mean that any error
would get ignored.
It would be better if nano wrote the full filename into the lock file,
because that would be clearer when Vim displays its warning, but...
this is faster and will do for now.
(Nano should simply also store the full filename in the openfile struct,
so that get_full_path() needs to be called just once for each file.)
This addresses https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57713.
The call of ferror() as parameter of a %s specifier was a mistake --
it returns a number, not a string. Avoid the problem by combining
two error checks.
The man page of fwrite() does not say anything about errno, but I guess
that the function calls write() and that the possible error numbers of
that function apply.
In theory it is now possible that fclose() fails and returns an error
that then masks an earlier error of fwrite(). But I can't be bothered:
lock files are not essential, and any errors that might occur are most
likely overlooked anyway because they are not displayed in red.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57724.
Bug existed since lock files were introduced, in version 2.3.2,
commit bf88d27a.
All the things that we need are located within the first 68 bytes of
the .swp file. We do write byte 1007 when the file is modified, but
we never reference it. We always wrote just 1024 bytes to the .swp
file, so it makes no sense to read in any more than that.
(Vim writes 4096 bytes to a .swp at first, before adding undo stuff
four seconds later. But the 1024 bytes appear to be enough for Vim
to recognize it as a lock file.)
When asking "continue?", I always thought that answering No would mean
that nano would not continue, that it would stop, that it would abort.
But No only means that it will not open the relevant file but continues
anyway to start up. Asking "open anyway?" is more easily understood in
that way.
Unreadable or corrupt lock files are not a user error nor user intent,
so they should not keep the user from editing the corresponding file.
Also, combine some error conditions to compact the code.
This addresses https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57700.
When in view mode, the file cannot be edited, so there is no need to
warn anyone (through a lock file) that the file might soon change.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57694.
At that point, 'u->cutbuffer' will always be NULL, either from the
original creation of the INSERT undo item, or by having been freed
and set to NULL by do_redo().
The 'prev' and 'next' links get assigned to immediately after the
call of copy_node(). And anyway, it does not make sense to link
a copied node to the predecessor and successor of its original.
Also slightly regroup some lines.
Also, the disabling of the keyboard interrupt (SIGINT) must happen
after that initialization call, otherwise ^C will still do nothing
after returning from suspension (when nano is built against Slang).
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57656.
Bug existed since version 2.2.0, commit daaf468c.
When the guiding stripe (when softwrapping) will be shown in
a later chunk, it shouldn't be shown in the current chunk.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57654.
Bug existed since --guidestripe was introduced, in version 4.0.
When having prepared a line for displaying on the screen, nano already
determind whether the line extends beyond the right edge or not. There
is no need to calculate again the full width of the current line later.
Just let display_string() make a note whether the piece of text that
it converted to displayable form still has more text coming after it,
and use this note when it's time to show the ">" continuation sign.
Using a static variable is ugly, but passing it along as a parameter
would be even uglier, because for all other calls of display_string()
the parameter would be just a useless burden.
(The diff is stupid. It should just remove 440 contiguous lines, and
add back 440 contiguous lines further down. Instead it tries to find
similarities between what is moved and what remains, and makes a mess.
You have to use --patience or --minimal to get the better diff.)
The plain keys that are valid in the help viewer are a perfect subset of
those that are valid in the file browser, so just use the same function
to do the interpretation for both. It is not a problem that it returns
function pointers for some keystrokes that have no meaning in the help
viewer, because both NULL and an unhandled function pointer result in
the "Unbound key" message.
Allow the user to paste in the character for Yes, No, or All. If the
paste contains more than one character, ignore all but the first.
This fully fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57623.
Reported-by: Brand Huntsman <alpha@qzx.com>
The tiny version is oblivious of bracketed pastes, as it serves no
purpose: in the tiny version there is no auto-indent nor undo nor
tabs-to-spaces conversion.
Any modifier keys that are needed to start the execution of a macro
(or of a string bind) should not affect the interpretation of the
keystrokes that are contained within the macro or the string.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57660.
Bug existed since macros were introduced, in version 2.9.0.
A control code cannot be a Meta keystroke, and a plain printable
character as key code necessarily means it is a Meta keystroke.
So, comparing just the key code is enough.
Note that DEL_CODE (0x7F) will never occur as input key code, because
it gets translated to KEY_DC in the input routine (or to KEY_BACKSPACE
when --rebinddelete is in effect).
The Shift detection on a Linux console was meant to affect only the
dedicated cursor-movement keys, not <Shift+Meta+character>.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57598.
Indirectly-reported-by: Brand Huntsman <alpha@qzx.com>
As long as the user does not define any Sh-M-X bindings in their nanorc,
<Shift> and <CapsLock> will not have any effect on <Alt+letter> combos.
But as soon as any Sh-M-X combination is bound, <Shift+Alt+letter> will
be seen as different from the unshifted keystroke.
This kind of fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54659.
Requested-by: Peter Passchier <peter@passchier.net>
Since ^@ is rebindable too and also a synonym of ^Space, it makes
more sense to allow the user to specify ^` instead, as it is an
unshifted keystroke on US keyboards.
Also, color ^` as valid in a nanorc file, and color ^` and ^@ in
the help viewer.
The meta flag needs to be suppressed only for the self-defined
<Meta+arrow> key codes.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57643.
Bug existed since commit 5130c35b from a few hours ago.
Some key strings map to the same key code, so to unbind also a string's
synonyms, go through the list comparing against the key code. It has
the additional advantage that it is faster: a plain value comparison
instead of a string comparison.
There is no need to compare also the meta flag, because plain printable
ASCII characters (from 0x20 to 0x7E) cannot be shortcuts, so when such
a character matches, it necessarily means it is a meta keystroke.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57397.
When assign_keyinfo() gets passed zero as key code, it will call
keycode_from_string() to determine the key code from the string.
So, remember the key code when keycode_from_string() gets called
the first time to avoid the second call.
When the mark is set at the current cursor position, and then something
is pasted (either with ^U or from outside of nano), then this entire
pasted text should be marked -- just like when it had been typed. So,
the mark's position should not be adjusted not only when it is located
before the cursor but also when it is at the same place as the cursor.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57631.
Bug existed since version 2.0.7.
Just like nano beeps when an unbound key is pressed at other prompts,
or in the help viewer, or in the file browser.
Signed-off-by: Brand Huntsman <alpha@qzx.com>
The suppression of auto-indentation, automatic hard-wrapping, and
tab-to-spaces conversion is now inherent in the way the reading-in
of a bracketed paste is handled by the previous commit: as a single
block of text.
This makes an external paste (with mouse or <Shift+Insert>) behave
the same as an internal paste (^U), and also inherently suppresses
auto-indentation, automatic hard-wrapping, and tab conversion.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54950.
This is a workaround for the VT not being able to handle zero-width
characters properly, displaying them mistakenly as visible characters.
This avoids https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52954.
The problem has existed since forever, but has become noticeable
since the capability for line numbers was added in version 2.7.1.
Benno Schulenberg