it's currently a build-time option
make it a runtime option instead, so that every
user can optionally make use of it, on all builds
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
thus, there's no need to handle flushing of stdout
whatsoever, and the code can be greatly simplified
ascii bits are still reset, when no input on stdin
is given
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
when spkmodem-recv doesn't receive anything (via stdout)
after a few frames, it's assumed that the console is dead
and the buffered output is flushed
this logic is assumed superfluous when -u is set
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
my style was: 2 tabs. bsd-style, for extending a line, is
4 spaces. this style has grown on me, so let's do it here
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
my style of C programming is this: always return errno
upon exit from the program, or from a thread.
handle errno in the calling/forking function.
returning errno at the end of main has this intention:
if an unhandled error occured, the program exits with
non-zero status.
a correctly written program should *never* return non-zero
at the end of main, and if it does, this indicates a bug
in the code (per my code style / philosophy).
so, warn the user with a message if this occurs. the
intention is that this message should never be printed.
do not use assert() for this. i don't believe in that.
such a test should always be present, for everyone.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
This version of spkmodem uses err() to indicate an error,
and the value of errno is used as exit status at all times,
even when it is zero.
When calling err(), it is intended that errno always be
non-zero, so modify the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
when calling fread(), errno may be set to EOVEFLOW if
the range being read will cause an integer overflow
if end-of-file is reached, errno may not be set. when
calling this function, you must check errno or check
feof() - ferror() should also be checked, so this check
is added immediately afterwards in the code
ferror() does not set errno, so ERR() is used to set
errno to ECANCELED as program exit status
further separate reading of frames into a new function
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
The mentality behind pledge and unveil is that you should
think ahead, so that large parts of code can run under
extremely tight restrictions.
The pledge calls have been adjusted accordingly, also.
Disallow all unveil calls after the gbe file and the
file /dev/urandom have been unveiled.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
This replaces a check in the function for O_RDONLY, and
fixes the bug where the "dump" command triggers such error.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
*Open* files at the start, then unveil. The same overall
behaviour is observed. In the case that invalid arguments
are given, simply opening a file does not cause much
performance impact (if any).
Restrict operations as early as possible in code.
Bonus:
writeGbeFile also hardened; if flags is O_RDONLY, it aborts.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
i screwed up in an earlier commit
this change fixes a bug where on rhex(), each
call would re-open /dev/urandom, resetting rfd
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
in practise, the file was never written unless the checksum
was valid, but in the same of sloccount reduction i made it
do the swap/copy before checking. while functionally ok, it
never sat right with me. this is one example of where sloc
count doesn't mean everything. code correctness is critical
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
the style was already quite similar, but extended lines in
bsd are indented by 4 spaces instead of a tab. this style
has grown on me, so i'm adopting it here
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
They don't precisely *pertain* to nvmutil, but they are
useful helper functions for calling pledge/unveil in
OpenBSD. Ideally, the main file should only contain core
logic pertaining to the execution of *nvmutil*.
Put xpledge() and xunveil() in nvmutil.h.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
When err() is called, it is intended that nvmutil will
always exit with non-zero status, but with errno as the
return value. Ensure that errno is *not* zero.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
Make word() a macro, simplify err_if().
Could also make setWord() a macro if I forego certain
optimisations, but I'll leave it as-is.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
After /dev/urandom (for MAC address randomisation) and
the GbE file have been handled, unveil them. Unveil is
a system call provided by OpenBSD that, when called,
restricts access only to the files and/or directories
specified, each given specific permissions.
You can learn more about unveil here:
https://man.openbsd.org/unveil.2
An ifdef rule makes nvmutil only use unveil on OpenBSD,
because it's not available anywhere else. This is the same
as with the pledge() system call.
Where invalid arguments are given, and no action performed,
pledge promises are also reduced to just stdio, preventing
any writes to files, or reads from files.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
After reading a file, remove rpath.
When removing rpath, also remove wpath if flags
are not to O_RDONLY (read-only disk operation).
When wpath is permitted, and a file was successfully
written, remove wpath.
In order to permit /dev/urandom access in rhex(),
I call it as a void just before re-calling pledge.
The rhex() function has been written in such a way
that /dev/urandom only needs to be read *once*.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
I assumed wpath was all that's needed, but this simply
allows writes.
rpath must be specified alongside wpath, for reads.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
The utils that are pledged checked HAVE_PLEDGE which was
bogus. OpenBSD defines __OpenBSD__, which you can check
for in ifdef.
This change makes nvmutil and spkmodem-recv *actually*
use pledge, when the utils are compiled on OpenBSD.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
It will only be used on OpenBSD. Other operating
systems will behave in the same way.
Pledge is feature specific to OpenBSD that
restricts system operations, for security:
https://man.openbsd.org/pledge.2
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
printf outputs to stdout, which is line buffered
by default.
Adding a -u option to disable buffering.
Exit when a non-support flag is given, but adhere
to current behaviour when no flag is given.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
They do not need to be initialised zero, because
global variables are always zero by default,
unless set differently by the programmer.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
Imported from util/spkmodem_recv at coreboot
revision:
e70bc423f9a2e1d13827f2703efe1f9c72549f20
This is a client for spkmodem, to allow serial
console via PC speaker.
I've decided to import it in lbmk, because I
heavily modified it. The patches will be
applied next.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
the deleted patch (in this commit) was written to fix an
issue theoretically; it hasn't been fully tested, and some
people have reported strange issues since this patch was
merged - there is no proof that this patch causes them, but
removing this patch is the correct thing to do regardless
when nicholas added this, he removed the README because it's
going on libreboot.org instead. however, i merged a WIP version
of his page for now because i want to get the e6400 going in
libreboot sooner. so, temp-readding this README. will just
link to this on codeberg or something, from the lb docs
NOTE: I didn't write this README, hence author field set
in the commit. Nicholas wrote it, but I (Leah Rowe) am just
adding it. so, git author set to nicholas, not me
Adding it to lbmk for now as it is not yet in coreboot. If it is merged
into coreboot we can just reference the one there. The original README
will be incorporated into a new page on lbwww, so README.md just points
to a placeholder URL that should match the new page.
small nitpick, but i try to use openbsd style
since i like that style. upon further reading
of their style guidelines today, it was revealed
to me that for includes, they:
* sort sys/ includes alphabetically, at the top
* after sys/ includes, have an empty line
* includes for networking-related headers below that
* empty space below networking headers if there
* after that, have the rest of the includes, sorted
alphabetically
at least, that is my understanding. i have to admit,
it does look cleaner
not really that critical but why not do it?
don't download it. keep it in lbmk.
libreboot moved to codeberg for git hosting,
and i didn't want to keep lugging around an
extra git repo just for one tiny project.
Leah Rowe