the update/trees script checks this binary itself, before
deciding whether to recompile/compile, so we don't need
to do such checks here.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
this is now used in grub, for the FS_PAYLOAD_MODULES
option in the make command
lbmk should generalise as much logic as possible. in
some parts of it, logic is hurrently hardcoded, specific
to a given project that lbmk uses, but lbmk is essentially
a source-based package manager, like what you might find
on a small linux distro, so we need to try to
be as generic as possible.
lbmk is the "build system of build systems", so it has to
work generically with as many of them as possible
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
it is no longer hardcoded just to be handled for uefiextract.
it is now defined as cmakedir in target.cfg, for a single or
multi tree project. if multi tree, it is applied to the specific
tree, and has to be defined per tree
the way it works is: as per cmakelist, a project will define
which directory is to be built, and it will then generate
a makefile in the main source tree (the build tree in cmake
language, where the main CMakeLists.txt file exists)
when the makefile has been generated, the project is then treated
like any other project. the way cmake works, if a makefile has
already been generated by it, in a given directory, running it
again will fail and not affect anything; if it fails but the
makefile doesn't exist, then something is wrong, but if the
makefile does exist, then it's all fine and nothing happens
at present, this is only used for uefiextract, which is part
of src/uefitool
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
the logic of the previous commit was correct, but one
of the functions was named the same as another function
used in this file, causing a namespace conflict, and
a build error
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
at present, the bootstrap and configure script is only
directly executed for grub, because grub is the only
project that uses them in lbmk
however, when i start adding linuxboot support, i will
have to start building a lot of projects, some of which
make use autoconf and bootstrap scripts
e.g.
./bootstrap --foo
./configure --bar
the "bootstrap" script is often used on GNU programs,
because they like to over-engineer absolutely everything
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
the script can now also handle autoconf build systems,
whereas this could previously only be done for grub.
with this change, the overall sloccount is also lower
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
arch no longer needs to be set, on multi-tree projects,
and it has been renamed to xarch
the new behaviour is: if xarch is set, treat it as a
list of crossgcc targets and go through the list. set
the first one as the target, for what lbmk builds, but
build all of the defined crossgccc targets
crossgcc_ada is now xlang, and defines which languages
to build, rather than whether to build gcc-gnat
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
while seemingly pedantic, this does actually make code
easier to read. mostly just switching to shorthand for
variable names, where no expansions or patterns are used
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
the rom functions print a path to the rom they built,
which is then used, but these are called inside what
are essentially subshells, and we had no error handling
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
cros roms are always using libgfxinit, with a coreboot
framebuffer, so the "normal" initmode is never used.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
lbmk used to set version/versiondate directly in
err.sh, but now it's handled there by a function,
which is called by the main script.
script/update/release hadn't yet been adapted. the
only change necessary is to call check_project()
script/update/trees also makes use of it
script/build/roms is using "projectname"
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
when make-all is being executed on a coreboot tree,
the "./vendor download target" command is used, where
target is the tree/board name.
that script then checks whether cbfstool and ifdtool
are built, and if they're not, they then call
./update trees -b coreboot utils bla bla bla
in this scenario, project=coreboot and mode="", meaning
make-all, and the same check that checks whether the
vendor download script should be run, is executed,
which in turn then checks cbutils again
fix the infinite loop by checking whether it was coreboot
utils, as opposed to *firmware*, that is to be built, before
running ./vendor download
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
the x_ function doesn't handle arguments with spaces
well, and this cd command is going to an asterisk, so
it's unknown what the resultant string will be.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
at present, lbmk can remove microcode updates on images for
a given target, if the target specifies
microcode_required="n" in target.cfg
lbmk then provides images with microcode, and images without,
in a given release. although the user can also remove them
manually, this just makes it a bit more convenient, for those
users who do wish to run without the updates. this functionality
is provided only on those platforms where no-microcode is tested.
well, this behaviour implements a compromise on libreboot policy,
which is to always include microcode updates by default. see:
Binary Blob Reduction Policy
the *canoeboot* project now exists, developed in parallel with
libreboot, and it ships without microcode updates, on the same
targets where lbmk also handled this.
running without microcode updates is foolish, and should not
be encouraged. clean up lbmk by not providing this kludge.
the libreboot documentation will be updated, telling such users
to try canoeboot instead, or to remove the update from a given
libreboot rom - this is still possible, and mitigations such as
PECI disablement on GM45 are still in place (and will be kept),
so that this continues to work well.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
the purpose of script/update/release is not to test the
build system, but to build release archives.
testing of lbmk is done during the course of development.
remove this bloat from the release script. we run the nuke
mode anyway, to scrub blobs from releases, which will more
or less test the logic in that script (the only difference
is that it runs e.g. ifdtool --nuke instead of -i).
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
why are we distributing gcc at all?
the coreboot build system downloads it at build time,
and the GNU rsync mirrors aren't going anywhere.
simplify script/update/release by not handling gcc.
this means: release archives will no longer contain gcc.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
don't handle "romtype" at all, in board target.cfg files
add /dev/null as pike2008 rom on amd boards. this serves
the same purpose, adding them as empty vga roms, to add
an empty rom in cbfs. pike2008 cards cause seabios to hang,
when their oproms are executed, so we insert a fake rom
on i945 thinkpads, use the coreboot config option:
CONFIG_INTEL_ADD_TOP_SWAP_BOOTBLOCK
when set, this enables the same bootblock copy, for use
with bucts. these two cases, namely pike2008 roms and
i945 bootblock copies, no longer need to be handled in code
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
only call crossgcc for coreboot and u-boot, but use
hostcc for everything else. simplify the checking of
which architecture to compile for. "arch" in target.cfg
files has been modified, to allow further simplification.
without this patch, the logic currently only *barely* avoids
using crossgcc on things like utils, and only works in practise
because, in practise, lbmk only works on x86_64 anyway.
the new logic, as per this patch, is simpler and more robust.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
remove unnecessary "continue" command. it's written
at the end of a for loop, where it'll continue anyway
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
all it did was set -v in the shell, which doesn't yield
very useful results. this is a relic of very old design
in the libreboot build system, that is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
lbmk didn't quote certain arguments in commands, or
used ! -z instead of -n, things like that. simple fixes.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
most of these are probably redundant, and will never
be called, but lbmk needs to be as safe as possible
under fault conditions. fail early, fail hard.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
in cases where lbmk must always return from a function,
there are some cases where it relies on non-zero exit
status, which in practise is always the case, but may
change in the future if the relevant part is modified
e.g. do_something && return 0
the proper form is:
do_something
return 0
also do this for unconditional exits
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
it didn't work in the past, but it does work nowadays;
specifically, it only worked with libgfxinit in the past,
but not on VGA ROMs.
now it does work on VGA ROMs, tested on e6400 and t1650 so
it was enabled there.
in this setup, a special image is provided where SeaBIOS is
the main payload, but it only loads GRUB; nothing else, every.
this is called SeaGRUB. this setup is useful in cases where
the user only has a GPU that lacks libgfxinit support.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
when printing the name of the rom being created, it's
done before the check to rename based on vendorfiles
in target.cfg. this patch fixes that bug.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
note: me6_update_parser needs to be written, similar
to me7_update_parser, to generate the partition
tables within intel me6 on lenovo bios updates.
the current logic in lbmk goes like this:
mkdir -p vendorfiles/cache/
and save your factory dump as:
vendorfiles/cache/x201_factory.rom
the build system has been modified, in such a way
as to support extracting me.bin (which is the full
one) and then neutering from this.
this is done automatically, if the file is present,
but you must first insert that file there, which means
you'll need a dump of the original boot flash on your
thinkpad x201
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
it wasn't being copied right
the roms under elf/ were being copied, but not the ones
under bin/ - i need to audit it further
for now, i run modify_coreboot_roms from build/roms
instead of update/trees
so, the ones under elf/ no longer have bootblocks copied.
it's only done in bin/
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
Leah Rowe